The Greek text of the codex is considered a representative of the
Byzantine text-type, though with many non-Byzantine readings. Biblical scholar
Burnett Hillman Streeter remarked some relationship between the codex and the supposed "
Caesarean" witnesses, especially in the
Gospel of Mark, but conceded it is only a tertiary witness to the type. However these variant readings are considered to be more in line with the
Alexandrian readings than the Caesarean. The text-types are groups of different New Testament manuscripts which share specific or generally related readings, which then differ from each other group, and thus the conflicting readings can separate out the groups. These are then used to determine the original text as published; there are three main groups with names:
Alexandrian,
Western, and
Byzantine. The Caesarean text-type however (initially identified by Streeter) has been contested by several text-critics, such as
Kurt and
Barbara Aland. According to biblical scholars
Kurt and
Barbara Aland, in the Gospel of Mark it agrees 88 times against the original text, 23 times supports the original text against the Byzantine, and 63 times it agrees with both. It also has 35 independent or distinctive readings. Kurt Aland placed the text of the codex in
Category III for the Gospel of Mark, and in
Category V for the rest of the books in his New Testament manuscript classification system. Category III manuscripts are described as having "a small but not a negligible proportion of early readings, with a considerable encroachment of [Byzantine] readings, and significant readings from other sources as yet unidentified." Category V manuscripts are described as "manuscripts with a purely or predominantly Byzantine text." It is one of only two catena manuscripts which are cited for variants in the gospel text in the Nestle-Aland critical edition of the New Testament (the other being
Codex Zacynthius). The manuscript belongs to Family 1424 together with
M (021),
7,
27,
71,
115,
160,
179,
185,
267,
349,
517,
659,
692,
827, 945, 954, 990, 1010, 1082, 1188, 1194, 1207, 1223, 1391, 1402, 1606, 1675, 2191 and other manuscripts (which comprise
von Soden's I group). The whole
Family 1424 is currently thought to deserve more textual study than it has received. According to the
Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 1675 in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20, as a diverging member. ; Textual variants : Matthew 11:2 :: Ιησου (
of Jesus) -
1424 D 0233 ℓ241 : John 12:5 :: διακοσιων (
two hundred) -
1424 ƒ 579 pc == History ==