The photograph was one of several taken by Leibovitz of 28-year-old Moore, then seven-months pregnant with the couple's second daughter, Scout LaRue Willis. The photographs ranged from Moore in
lacy underwear and
spiked high heels, to a revealing
peignoir. The final selection had Moore wearing only a diamond ring.
Joanne Gair was the makeup artist for the shoot.
Samuel Irving Newhouse, Jr., chairman of
Conde Nast Publications, was very supportive of the cover despite the potential for lost sales.
Tina Brown,
Vanity Fair editor, quickly realized that there would be harsh backlash for regular distribution of the magazine; the issue had to be wrapped in a white envelope with only Moore's eyes visible. Some editions had a brown wrapper that implied naughtiness. However, Brown viewed the image as a chance to make a statement about the decade of the 1990s after a decade dominated by
power suits. Approximately 100 million people saw the cover. The use of a pregnant sex symbol was in a sense an attempt to combat the
pop culture representations of the anathema of the uncomfortable and grotesquely excessive female form in a culture that values thinness. Leibovitz' candid portrayal drew a wide spectrum of responses from television, radio, and newspaper personalities and the public at large ranging from complaints of
sexual objectification to celebrations of the photograph as a symbol of
empowerment. One of the judges in
Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp. stated that the image evoked
Botticelli's
Birth of Venus. The retrospective view of some was that the photograph is "high art". The intent of the photograph was to portray pregnancy with a celebrity in a way that was bold and understated in an "anti-Hollywood, anti-glitz" manner. It was successful in some regards as many perceived it as a statement of beauty and pride. However, many took offense and the cover drew unusually intense controversy for
Vanity Fair in the form of ninety-five television spots, sixty-four radio shows, 1,500 newspaper articles, and a dozen cartoons. Some stores and newsstands refused to carry the August issue, while others concealed it in the wrapper evocative of porn magazines. The photo is not only considered one of Leibovitz's most famous, but also an almost mythical representation. It is considered emblematic of Si Newhouse's reputation for "newsy features and provocative photos." It is the first photo mentioned in the
New York Times review of Leibovitz's exhibition ''Annie Leibovitz: A Photographer's Life, 1990-2005'' at the
Brooklyn Museum and it is contrasted with another of her female pregnancy photographs (of
Melania Trump). A year later, Moore still did not understand the controversy that caused photos of a naked, pregnant woman to be viewed as morally objectionable. Moore stated that, "I did feel glamorous, beautiful and more free about my body. I don't know how much more family oriented I could possibly have gotten." She considered the cover to be a healthy "feminist statement." In 2007, Moore stated that the picture was not originally intended for publication. She had posed in a personal photo session, not a cover shoot. Leibovitz has had personal photo sessions of Moore and all of her daughters.
Cover story One journalist's professional account of the cover story describes it as "relentlessly long", and a second journalist's description is that it is a "very long profile". The article discussed the then three-year-old
Rumer Willis and husband Bruce Willis. Willis and Moore discuss each other in the article. The article also spends three pages recounting her life. The article spent little time on her next film, ''
The Butcher's Wife'', or the child she was pregnant with, Scout Willis. ==Legal issues==