Most
taxa differ morphologically from other taxa. Typically, closely related taxa differ much less than more distantly related ones, but there are exceptions to this.
Cryptic species are
species which look very similar, or perhaps even outwardly identical, but are
reproductively isolated. Conversely, sometimes unrelated taxa acquire a similar appearance as a result of
convergent evolution or even
mimicry. In addition, there can be morphological differences within a species, such as in
Apoica flavissima where queens are significantly smaller than workers. A further problem with relying on morphological data is that what may appear morphologically to be two distinct species may in fact be shown by
DNA analysis to be a single species. The significance of these differences can be examined through the use of
allometric engineering in which one or both species are manipulated to
phenocopy the other species. A step relevant to the evaluation of morphology between traits/features within species, includes an assessment of the terms:
homology and homoplasy. Homology between features indicates that those features have been derived from a common ancestor. Alternatively, homoplasy between features describes those that can resemble each other, but derive independently via
parallel or
convergent evolution. ==3D cell morphology: classification==