Morteza Motahhari expressed his opinions in different majors and disciplines such as philosophy, religion, economic, politics, etc. Motahhari and
Shariati were counted as two prominent figures during
Islamic revolution of Iran. He emphasized on Islamic democracy for suitable political structure. Also he believed that
Wali-e faqih only had the right of supervisory not governing. He also maintained that the ruling was one of the political aspect of Imam in society. He maintained that there was no conflict between science and religion since he believed that Science qua science had no conflict and challenge with metaphysics. He believed that the quasi-conflict between science and religion was in terms of their language not themselves.
Development Motahhari also expressed views on development and relevant ideology. According to him, freedom, culture and mental-cultural revolution are principles of development. He also refers to some elements for characterizing a developed society. These factors are independence, knowledge and transcendence. Also, according to Motahhari, development originates from cultural self-reliance, purification of cultural sources and logical and cautious communication with
west. Motahhari believed in the development of human resources but he also thought that economy was not an aim but only is a condition for development.
Equality As outlined by Ayatollah Morteza Motahhari in 1975, the phrase 'equal rights' means something different from what is commonly understood by Western world. He clarified that men and women were innately different and therefore enjoyed different rights, duties and punishments. In 1966-1967, amidst the growing debate over the Shah's Family Protection Law, he published a series of essays in
Zan-e Rooz (Today’s Woman) on subjects such as divorce, inheritance rights, alimony, polygamy, and differences between genders. The "return to shari'a" by Motahhari was a mixed discourse that borrowed from Western ideas whenever they were suitable to his objectives. For example, he condemned those who opposed women's higher education, emphasizing that trained female doctors and surgeons were necessary for the gender-segregated social structure he sought. Additionally, he adopted elements from Protestant charitable practices in the West.
Fiqh Motahhari believed that the eternality of Islam is provided by
Fiqh. He thought that fiqh along with the character of
ijtihad could be an important thing for confronting with the problem of different times and places. Using ijtihad, there is no need to a new prophet.
Philosophy of law Like other men of thought, Motahhari thinks that we have to define the concepts first of all. Therefore, he defines right as a dominance or score on something. According to right the human is merit to possess something and other human ought to respect him. Some of rights are such as the right of parents on their children or the rights of husband and wife in relation to each other. Motahhari divided the right into two groups. First group is existential rights or takwini and the second is religious rights or tashriei. former is a real relation between person and object and the latter determined according to former. He knew the right as a potential score for persons. In fact the right concerned with the priority of somebody on something. He concerned with the question in that is the right and possession predicated on human as such or predicated on human in terms of being in society? He believes that undoubtedly the right existed prior to society. Contrary to
John Austin (legal philosopher), Motahhari believes that there is a mutual relation between right and responsibility (
Haq va Taklif). Motahhari believes that the natural law theory is a rational one that is of importance for human kind. According to him, the foundation of natural theory of law is to world has a goal and aim finally. On the basis of principle of having goal, the God creates the world for the sake of human kind and they have potential right to change the world therefore human kind have right prior to introducing in society.
Philosophy of religion Motahhari refers to the concept of 'maktab' or school when he intends to define the word of religion. According to him maktab is a thoughtful disciplined system including ideology and View in terms of ethics, politics, economy and civil law, etc. Finally, he defines religion as a collection of knowledge bestowed to human for the sake of guiding him and also religion is a collection of beliefs, moralities and individual and collective judgments. Therefore, he knows religion and its teaching as beliefs, moralities and judgments. Also Motahhari believes that the domain of religion at all is not limited to life but concerned with after afterlife. He believes that Islam as a religion is consistent with life of human and there is no room for denying it.
Western philosophy Dariush Shayegan believes that Motahhari confused the
Hegelian thought and
Stace's quotations in confronting with Hegel. According to Shaygan since each of Motahhari and Hegel belong to different paradigms, there is no common world between them. ==Epistemology==