The project has met resistance from
environmental and
conservation groups such as
Italia Nostra, and the
World Wide Fund for Nature, who have made negative comments about the project. Criticisms of the MOSE project, which environmentalists and certain political forces have opposed since its inception, relate to the costs to the Italian State of construction, management, and maintenance, which are said to be much higher than those for alternative systems employed by the Netherlands and England to resolve similar problems. In addition, according to the project's opponents, the monolithic integrated system is not "gradual, experimental and reversible" as required by the Special Law for the Safeguarding of Venice. There have also been criticisms of the environmental impact of the barriers, not just at the inlets where complex leveling will be carried out (the seabed must be flat at the barrier installation sites) and the lagoon bed reinforced to accommodate the gates (which will rest on thousands of concrete piles driven deep underground), but also on the hydrogeological balance and delicate ecosystem of the lagoon. The
NO MOSE front also emphasises what could be a number of critical points in the structure of the system and its inability to cope with predicted rises in sea level. Over the years, nine appeals have been presented, eight of which have been rejected by the TAR (
Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale, meaning the Regional Administrative Tribunal) and the Council of State. The ninth, currently under evaluation by the TAR, was presented by the Venice Local Authority and contests the favourable opinion of the Safeguard
Venice Commission on the commencement of work at the Pellestrina site in the Malamocco inlet. Here, part of the MOSE gate housing caissons will be made using processes which, according to the local authority, could damage a site of special natural interest. Environmental associations have also requested the intervention of the
European Union (EU), as project activities affect sites protected by the
Nature 2000 Network and the
European Directive on birds. Following a report of 5March 2004 by the Venetian MP
Luana Zanella, on 19December 2005 the
European Commission opened an infraction procedure against Italy for "pollution of the
habitat" of the lagoon. The European Environmental Commission Directorate General considers that as it has "neither identified nor adoptedin relation to the impacts on the area 'IBA 064-Venice Lagoon' resulting from construction of the MOSE projectappropriate measures to prevent pollution and deterioration of the habitat, together with harmful disturbance of birds with significant consequences in the light of the objectives of article 4 of
EEC Directive 79/409, the Italian Republic has not fulfilled its obligations under Article 4, Paragraph 4, of EEC Directive 79/409 of the Council of 2April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds." Although the European Environmental Commission has said that the initiative is not intended to stop MOSE going ahead, the body has called on the
Italian Government to produce new information on the impact of the sites and the
environmental mitigation structures. The Water Authority and
Consorzio Venezia Nuova both confirm that the construction sites are temporary and will be completely restored at the end of the work. In 2014, 35 people, including
Giorgio Orsoni, the
Mayor of Venice, were arrested in Italy on corruption charges in connection with the MOSE Project. Orsoni was accused of receiving illicit funds from the Consorzio Venezia Nuova, the consortium behind the construction of the project, which he then used in his campaign to be elected mayor. There were allegations that 20 million euros in public funds had been sent to foreign bank accounts and used to finance political parties. Following the legal proceedings occurred between 2013 and 2014, that involved part of the management bodies of the Consorzio Venezia Nuova and its Companies, the State intervened in order to ensure the conclusion of the flood defence system: in December 2014, the ANAC (
National Anti-Corruption Authority) proposed the extraordinary management of the Consorzio, which followed the appointment of three Special Chief Executive Officers. The Special Administration of the Consorzio pursued its task to guarantee the proper completion of Mose and to ensure the conclusion of the defense system on 2018. While MOSE's supporters say it can handle the threat of rising waters from
global warming, others have doubted the project can face this challenge. Luigi D’Alpaos, a professor emeritus of hydraulics, wrote that "MOSE is obsolete and philosophically wrong, conceptually wrong," for example. The problem is that while the gates could hypothetically deal with rising waters, they could only do so by raising the floodgates so often that they would function as a "near-permanent wall." This, in turn, would devastate the lagoon's drainage and interchange with the Adriatic Sea; Venice's lagoon would become a "stagnant pool for algae and waste" if the gates were usually left up. == See also ==