Guseva developed interest in the
eastern world, and in 1940, completed her graduation from the
Leningrad State University with a specialty in Indology. Later, she worked at the
Institute of Ethnography in Moscow as an employee, but in 1946, she joined the institute as a student for further studies. From 1950 to 1952, she worked as a research assistant at the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR. In 1951, she came to Moscow and completed her
Candidate of Sciences at the Institute of Ethnography with the defense of her thesis titled
"Этнический состав населения Южной Индии" (The Ethnic Composition of the Population of South India). Later in 1952, she left Uzbekistan and on the invitation of
Sergey Pavlovich Tolstov, she started working again at the Institute of Ethnography of the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union where she worked until her retirement in 1998. However, from 1963 to 1964, she had worked as the senior methodologist of the Russian language at the House of Soviet Culture in Delhi. In 1978, she completed her Doctor of Sciences at the institute with the defense of her thesis titled
"Индуизм: история формирования. Культовая практика" (Hinduism: The History of Formation. Cultic Practice). In her research, she worked to identify common features between the
Hindu and
Slavic mythologies. She was a member of the
Union of Soviet Writers, and later became a member of the
Union of Russian Writers. She delivered a number of lectures for the
Union of Soviet Societies for Friendship and Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries. Along with a number of her contemporary researchers, Guseva also suggested that
Jainism originated long before 500 BCE. According to Guseva, Jainism is very different from
Brahmanism and the
Vedic religion and it does not believe in the
Varna system, rejects the concept that
Veda is holy, and opposes the concept of gods being the center of worship. Tokarev termed Guseva's claim of Jainism being the most ancient, and even pre-median, religion of India as doubtful. ==Criticism==