In later decades,
Never Let Me Down has continued to receive negative reviews and is generally considered one of Bowie's weakest releases. Several made unfavourable comparisons to
Tonight. Critic
Charles Shaar Murray told journalist
Dylan Jones in the 2010s that he thought
Never Let Me Down was "just awful" compared to
Tonight, a record "of classy filler with no center". In
The Rolling Stone Album Guide,
Rob Sheffield wrote: "
Tonight was an expensive quickie padded with lame covers, while
Never Let Me Down made things even worse with originals." Many commentators agree that the album's poor production choices marred what they considered good songwriting. In 2018, Chris Ingalls of
PopMatters named "Time Will Crawl" and "Zeroes" among those affected by the "headache-inducing [and] overstuffed with garish" production. The author
Marc Spitz noted "Day-In Day-Out", "87 and Cry", "New York's in Love" and "Time Will Crawl" as tracks that are hampered by poor production. Perone contends that the production on "Zeroes" and "Beat of Your Drum" make the tracks sound too much like other contemporary pop of the era "to stand out as distinctive".
Dave Thompson highlights "Zeroes", the title track, "Glass Spider", and particularly "Time Will Crawl" as standout tracks, finding Bowie's initial dismissive attitude towards the project "galling" when considering the "strength" of these tracks. The journalist Sean Doyle, editor of the website
The Worst Albums Ever, similarly stated that
Never Let Me Down is "produced to death": "The extravagant production clashes sharply with the album's often socially minded lyrics, so much so that they become entirely flippant and insincere." The author Benoît Clerc said that the album's excessive use of the Linn 9000 drum machine creates a dated sound with "a cold and impersonal monotony". Bowie's biographers have given
Never Let Me Down mixed assessments, but most consider it better than
Tonight. Buckley calls
Never Let Me Down more focused and coherent than its predecessor, but finds that it suffers from overproduction. O'Leary similarly calls it Bowie's "ugliest-sounding record" since
Diamond Dogs, noting that Bowie produced both records with the intention of "proving himself", which backfired. Trynka states that the record is "bereft of inspiration", but agrees that it is "neither as good nor as bad as
Tonight". In a similar statement, Spitz describes
Never Let Me Down as "not a terrible album", but "another slothful one" following
Tonight and
Labyrinth. Perone, likewise, considers it better and more artistically daring than
Tonight and writes that it achieves "a better balance between working on pop songs and challenging songs". Nevertheless, he acknowledges its dated production as its biggest flaw. Like Perone, Pegg states that
Never Let Me Down is not Bowie's "finest hour, but by no means his worst". He argues that it comes off as more of a David Bowie album than either of its two predecessors.
Christopher Sandford describes it as "a shoddily constructed work" that lacked innovation, while Thompson attributes the album's failure to it being "brutally out of sync" with the contemporary music of the time. In a 2016 retrospective ranking all of Bowie's 26 studio albums from worst to best, Bryan Wawzenek of
Ultimate Classic Rock placed
Never Let Me Down last, stating "There is no greater let-down in Bowie's catalog than the nadir of what he later called his 'Phil Collins years'," noting "bad idea after bad idea". The writers of
Consequence of Sound ranked the album number 21 (out of 28, including the two Tin Machine records) in their 2018 list, arguing that both it and
Tonight are due for reevaluations, as "Bowie's weaker efforts are still better than most". ==Reissues==