Non-state actors can aid in opinion building in international affairs, such as the
Human Rights Council. Formal international organizations may also rely on non-state actors, particularly NGOs in the form of implementing partners in the national context. An example is the contribution of
COHRE (Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions), to the protection of land and property (HLP) rights in
Kosovo by conceptualizing the Housing and Property Directorate (now Kosovo Property Agency) within the framework of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. Non-state actors are fundamental agents in helping to achieve both national and international development goals, such as those around climate change. Actions by non-state actors contribute significantly towards filling the greenhouse gas emissions gap left by unambitious or poorly executed national climate policies,
Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs). Another example that shows the importance of non-state actors in peace-building is the contribution of
ICBL (International Campaign to Ban Landmines) to the international prohibition on the use of landmines. ICBL is a global network of NGOs that has operated in over 90 countries since 1992. Its primary goal is to make a world free of
anti-personnel landmines. Their passionate advertising appealing for global cooperation drew
Diana, Princess of Wales to become an ardent advocate. Together, they brought the issue to the
United Nations General Assembly. ICBL's efforts led the international community to urge states to ratify the
Ottawa Treaty (Mine Ban Treaty) in 1997, and its contribution was recognized and praised as it was awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize in the same year. Non-state actors also have a role in
governance. While NSAs are incredibly useful in advancing international peace, monitoring human rights violations, and lobbying for socio-political issues like climate change, they also play a role in non-traditional governance. Many
fragile states rely on non-state actors for protection and administration. More traditional methods of governance include local courts and clans, on the other end, non-traditional NSA groups govern as paramilitaries or rebel groups. The importance of this is that in the last 20 years non-state actors have acquired legal recognition due to their heavy involvement in the international order. Their growing presence as an alternative governmental presence also holds them accountable to international law. ==See also==