Indigenous rock art During the construction of the Karratha Gas Plant in the 1980s, it is estimated that 5,000
sacred rock art sites were destroyed. In 2025 archaeologist Ken Mulvaney described the destruction of rock art for the construction of the North West Shelf, saying that around 5000 petroglyphs recorded by his team had been destroyed by construction of the plant, crushed by bulldozers and
dynamited. An agreement for land access to the area on which the North West Shelf operates was executed in 1998, between the
Ngarluma and
Yindjibarndi people.
Traditional Owners have regularly sought re-negotiation of the agreement, citing that
Elders who signed the agreement could not read or write English and thus could not understand nor consent to the agreement. In response, Raelene Cooper, a
Mardudhunera woman and former chair of the
Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation, said: "How can [Meg O'Neill] say it was culturally appropriate - who did Woodside ask for permission, and who gave them cultural authority?" UNESCO asked the government to "ensure the total removal of degrading acidic emissions" and to develop a decommissioning and rehabilitation plan for the area around the gas plant. In response to the Commonwealth stating its intent to approve the expansion of the North West Shelf, a group of
Elders and emerging
Traditional Owner (TO) leaders penned a letter to Murray Watt. The letter noted that Watt was intending to approve the gas plant extension without having ever visited Murujuga, and neither he nor any of the state or Commonwealth negotiators had ever met with local Aboriginal people. She also wrote of the trauma to her people caused by the destruction of the sacred sites, leading to deterioration of their health, economic wellbeing, and
social fabric. Peter Hicks, chair of the Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation, approved of the section 10 protections but did not comment on the 48 conditions of the commonwealth approval, but Raelene Cooper intends to take legal action against the government on behalf of her people.
Environment In 2019,
Woodside, and the Joint Venture partners,
Chevron,
Shell,
BP, and Mimi, proposed to extend the life of the North West Shelf project, including the Karratha Gas Plant. In June 2022 the independent
Environmental Protection Authority of Western Australia recommended to the
Government of Western Australia extending the project's operation until 2070, provided it consistently reduces operational emissions. The CER listed Woodside as 7th biggest greenhouse gas-emitter in Australia in the financial year ending 2023. In December 2024, after a six-year approval period, an extension until 2070 was granted to the project by the state government. However, by April 2025, the Commonwealth government had postponed a decision on the approval of the extension of the North West Shelf until after the 2025 federal election. On 28 May 2025, the same day UNESCO declined the World Heritage Listing due to damage to rock art from emissions, Federal Environmental Minister
Murray Watt approved the Gas Plant to operate for another 45 years. This drew heavy criticism from the Traditional Owner community and environmentalists. Watt said that he had not been required to consider the impact on
climate change, which is not grounds to refuse or limit a development application under the
Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act). Scientists and environmentalists said that the extra 45 years could add to up to six billion tonnes of
greenhouse gases, the majority of which would be emitted after the gas was burned in countries to which it was exported.
Larissa Waters, leader of the
Australian Greens, said that the decision had meant that there was no prospect of achieving
net-zero emissions by 2050. In 2025, the gas plant is the third-largest emitter in Australia.
Deloitte report questioning whether the state’s gas exports, including those from the North West Shelf Project, genuinely assist other countries in their energy transitions. The $402,000 report, delivered in early 2025 but not made public, found that while natural gas is often described as a “
transition fuel”, it may actually delay the adoption of zero-emission technologies and risk locking importing nations into long-term fossil fuel dependence, undermining their 2050 net-zero commitments. Deloitte’s analysis suggested that demand for Australian gas in key markets such as Japan and South Korea is already declining, and that any remaining growth in China and India is likely to end by the mid-2030s if those countries are to meet decarbonisation targets. mocked the decision to prolong the project’s operating life, suggesting that the policymakers who approved it would not live to see the consequences of its climate impacts. The piece framed the extension as emblematic of the “shift the burden to future generations” logic and pointed to criticism from conservation groups and Traditional Owners about the project’s environmental and cultural risks. The second article titled “PM Proves Tanya Plibersek Is A Good Mate Of His By Moving Her Out Of Environment Before Expanding The North West Shelf” satirised the timing of a ministerial reshuffle coinciding with the government’s approval of the extension, casting the move as politically self-serving rather than driven by climate integrity. While comedic and exaggerated, these satires reflect broader public scepticism about the project’s alignment with Australia’s climate goals, transparency of decision-making and commitments to affected Indigenous communities. In another Betoota Advocate article “Labor Address Concerns Over Rapid Gas-Drilling Expansions: ‘They’ll Do A Welcome To Country First’” delivers a sharp satire of performative corporate and political behaviour surrounding Woodside Energy and the North West Shelf Project. It ridicules the way both the company and government deploy symbolic gestures—such as holding a “Welcome to Country” before new drilling or decorating worksites with rainbow pamphlets during Pride Month—to project cultural sensitivity and inclusivity while continuing large-scale gas expansion. The humour exposes a deeper critique: that these displays of respect and social progressivism are used to mask or morally offset environmentally and culturally destructive practices. By parodying the substitution of ceremony and branding for genuine accountability, the piece underscores how Woodside’s and the government’s public relations strategies amount to performative allyship—using the language and imagery of reconciliation and diversity to legitimise ongoing fossil-fuel extraction and delay meaningful climate action. ==See also==