Ojibwe pronouns, along with distinguishing singular and plural number and first, second, third, and fourth (obviative) persons, also carry a distinction between inclusive and exclusive first person plural. Pronouns may present themselves either as independent words or as series of prefixes and suffixes. An
inclusive first person plural indicates that the pronoun includes the addressee, i.e., "we including you" (
giinawind). An
exclusive first person plural indicates that the addressee is not included, i.e., "we excluding you" (
niinawind). The other personal pronouns are the first singular
niin, second singular
giin, third singular
wiin, second plural
giinawaa, and third plural
wiinawaa. Like the independent words, Ojibwe pronominal prefixes indicate first person with
n-, second person with
g- and third person with
w-. However, the associated suffixes for these persons will be different depending on if the word is a verb or a noun. In many Ojibwe-speaking communities, the first person prefix is used without the initial
n. Due to vowel syncope in some communities, those prefixes are further reduced without the initial
i. However, among Saulteaux communities, the first person prefix
nim- and
nin- are instead reduced to
ni-,
nind- to
nid- and
nindo- to
nido-. Ojibwe also has a set of
demonstrative pronouns, distinguishing animate/inanimate, here/there/yonder/over here, singular/plural, and proximate/obviative. The demonstratives differ in their phonetic forms very significantly across Ojibwe dialects and communities, so this table, based on the Minnesota dialect of Southwestern Ojibwe, will not be entirely correct for many speakers: Ojibwe also has a set of "indefinite" pronouns (
awiiya, "someone",
gegoo, "something," both of which can be preceded by
gaawiin or
akina to mean "no one, nothing" and "everyone, everything," respectively). In contrast to the Southwestern Ojibwe's demonstrative pronouns, Central Ojibwe, Northwestern Ojibwe and Western Ojibwe—which includes a larger set of obviatives—have a larger set of demonstratives: ==Verbs== Ojibwe verbs mark information not only on the subject (their animacy, person, and plurality) but also on the object. There are several different classes of verbs in the language, which differ based on whether they are
transitive or
intransitive and whether they take animate or inanimate subjects. These are the main classes: Verbs mark tenses with prefixes (''a'-
, aorist past, gii'-
, simple past, ga(d)-
and da-
, future, and wii'-
, desiderative future), but also can take a myriad of affixes known as "preverbs", which convey a great amount of additional information about an action. For example, the preverb izhi-
means "in such a way," and so its addition to the verb root -ayaa-
, "to be," makes the verb izhi-ayaa
, "to be a certain way." The preverb bimi-
, "along," combines with the verb root -batoo-
, "to run," to form bimibatoo'', "to run along, run by." The preferred order of these prefixes are personal prefix, tense prefix, directional prefix, relative prefix, any number of preverbs, and finally the verb. In addition, the initial syllable may be modified
by an initial vowel change or by an initial syllable reduplication. Furthermore, there are three so-called "orders" of Ojibwe verbs. The basic one is called
Independent Order, and is simply the
indicative mood. There is also a
Conjunct Order, which is most often used with verbs in
subordinate clauses, in questions (other than simple yes–no questions), and with participles (participles in Ojibwe are verbal nouns, whose meaning is roughly equivalent to "someone who is (VERB), does (VERB)," for example, the word for "traveler,"
bebaamaadizid, is the third singular conjunct of
babaamaadizi, "to travel about," and literally means "someone who travels about"). The final order is the
Imperative Order, used with commands and corresponding to the
imperative mood. Negatives are generally introduced by the leading word
gaawiin, which is usually translated as "no," before introducing the actual words in their negative form. Negatives are generally formed by adding
sii (or
zii) for independent order and
si (or
zi) for conjunct order, both adding the negative element immediately after the root but before other suffixes. The
sii/
si are found after vowels while the
zii/
zi are found after
n. In some words, the final consonant is dropped and the
sii/
si are added to the remaining vowel, in other words the final
m is converted to
n before adding
zii/
zi, yet in other words a linking vowel
i (or
aa) is added after the final consonant and then the
sii/
si added. Imperatives do not follow the
sii (
zii)/
si (
zi) pattern. There are three imperatives in Ojibwe: the
immediate imperative, used to indicate that the action must be completely right away (
nibaan!, "Sleep (right now)!"), the
delayed imperative, used to indicate that the action should be completely eventually, but not immediately (
nibaakan!, "Sleep (in a little bit)!"), and the
prohibitive imperative, used to indicate that the action is prohibited (
(gego) nibaaken!, "Don't sleep!"). Like the negatives, the "k" in
-k,
-ken,
-keg and
-kegon take on the lenis form and become "g" after
n. Also like the negatives, the general the connector vowel between the imperative suffix and the terminal consonant here is
i; however, for
k/
g, the connector vowel instead is
o. All verbs can also be marked for four "modes:" indicative (neutral),
dubitative (the speaker is unsure about the validity of what they are saying, for example:
bakade, "he is hungry," but
bakadedog, "he must be hungry; he could be hungry"), preterit (which emphasizes that the action occurred in the past, and is also used to refer to attempted or intended but uncompleted actions, for example:
imaa ninamadab, "I'm sitting there," but
imaa ninamadabiban, "I was sitting there; I meant to sit there"), or preterit-dubitative (which expresses doubt about a past action:
imaa namadabigoban, "she must have sat there; she could have sat there").
Intransitives As an example of some of the Ojibwe verbal distinctions at work, consider the conjugation of positive and negative indicative long-vowel-final VAI verbs (using the example
nibaa, "to sleep"): Also as an example of some of the Ojibwe verbal distinctions at work, consider the conjugation of positive and negative indicative long-vowel-final VII verbs (using the example
ozhaawashkwaa, "to (be) blue"). Note that unlike VAI verbs, VII do not have imperatives: Passives in intransitives can be expressed by using the INVERSE marker
igw, which may undergo a minor structural modification. Some examples of verb final containing the INVERSE marker
igw are:
Transitives Ojibwe, as with other Algonquian languages, also exhibits a
direct–inverse system, in which transitive verbs are marked for whether or not the direction of the action follows a "topicality hierarchy" of the language. The topicality hierarchy in Ojibwe is
2 > 1 > X > 3 > 3’ > 0, determined by 1) person, 2) gender, and 3) obviation. Ojibwe has no
case distinctions among agent, patient and experiencer
theta roles, so in a transitive verb with two participants, the only way to distinguish subject from object is through direct/inverse/goal suffixes.
Note: C, N, nN, S and Y are used in some of the tables below to indicate a generic consonant, n\zh varying consonant, n\nzh varying consonant, s\sh varying consonant, and Ø\i varying palatializer, respectively. The local goals, non-local goals and reflective cause the stem to undergo minor adjustments: 1. In
Oji-Cree (Severn Ojibwe) language, in
Algonquin language, and in some
Central Ojibwa language (especially in
North of Superior Ojibwe) Transitive verbs can become VAI class of verbs by adding the actor-focused DETRANSITIVE marker
ige, which modifies the stem in a similar fashion as the INVERSE marker
igw. However, due to differences in dialects, how the actor-focused DETRANSITIVE marker
ige may show up differently. For the first person and second person GOALs, their ACTORs are specified if the words are in their
Independent Order, and can also be known as
local direct (first person GOAL) and
local inverse (second person GOAL). A DIRECT suffix indicates that the action is performed by someone higher on the person hierarchy on someone lower on the person hierarchy (e.g., by the addressee on the speaker, or by a proximate third person on an obviative): {{interlinear|indent=2|lang=oj-Latn|glossing = no abbr An inverse suffix indicates that the action is performed by someone lower on the person hierarchy on someone higher on the person hierarchy (e.g., by the speaker on the addressee, or by an obviative third person on a proximate): {{interlinear|indent=2|lang=oj-Latn|glossing = no abbr As can be seen, the only difference between these two verbs is the direct–inverse opposition, rather than case markers (or word order, when distinct nominals are used). An inverse verb is
not equivalent to a
passive verb. There is a separate passivity marker, denoted in literature as "indefinite person (X)", ranked in topicality hierarchy below first and second persons, but higher than animate and inanimate third persons: {{interlinear|indent=2|lang=oj-Latn|glossing = no abbr To illustrate this, a generic VTA and VTI paradigm table, arranged by person hierarchy, is shown below. Note that the reflexive forms shown in a darker background with the reflexive theme
/-idizo/ happen to be VAI. The table depicts only the paradigm for Independent Order, Positive Voice, Neutral Mode. Letters omitted in a particular form are indicated with that letter struck-through. ==Preverbs==