Although nuclear weapons were viewed as the ultimate guarantor of Israeli security as early as the 1960s, the country avoided building its military around them, instead pursuing absolute conventional superiority so as to forestall a last resort nuclear engagement. They contrasted it with the
ancient siege of
Masada, in which 936 Jewish
Sicarii committed
mass suicide rather than be defeated and enslaved by the
Romans. In an article titled "Last Secret of the Six-Day War"
The New York Times reported that in the days before the 1967
Six-Day War Israel planned to insert a team of paratroopers by helicopter into the
Sinai. Their mission was to set up and remotely detonate a nuclear bomb on a mountaintop as a warning to belligerent surrounding states. While outnumbered, Israel effectively eliminated the
Egyptian Air Force and occupied the Sinai, winning the war before the test could even be set up. Retired Israeli brigadier general Itzhak Yaakov referred to this operation as the Israeli Samson Option. In the 1973
Yom Kippur War, Arab forces were overwhelming Israeli forces and Prime Minister
Golda Meir authorized a nuclear alert and ordered 13 atomic bombs be readied for use by missiles and aircraft. The Israeli Ambassador informed President
Richard Nixon that "very serious conclusions" may occur if the United States did not airlift supplies. Nixon complied. This is seen by some commentators on the subject as the first threat of the use of the Samson Option. Seymour Hersh writes that the "surprising victory of
Menachem Begin's
Likud Party in the May 1977 national elections ... brought to power a government that was even more committed than
Labor to the Samson Option and the necessity of an Israeli nuclear arsenal."
Louis René Beres, a professor of
political science at
Purdue University, chaired
Project Daniel, a group advising Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon. He argues in the Final Report of Project Daniel and elsewhere that the effective deterrence of the Samson Option would be increased by ending the policy of nuclear ambiguity. In a 2004 article he recommends Israel use the Samson Option threat to "support conventional preemptions" against enemy nuclear and non-nuclear assets because "without such weapons, Israel, having to rely entirely upon non-nuclear forces, might not be able to deter enemy retaliations for the Israeli
preemptive strike." ==Authors' opinions ==