in 2007 In 1993, Hersh became a regular contributor to
The New Yorker, edited by
Tina Brown until 1998 and
David Remnick thereafter. A piece by him in 1993 alleged that
Pakistan had developed nuclear weapons with the consent of the Reagan and
Bush administrations, using restricted, high-tech materials purchased in the U.S. In two articles in May 2004, "Chain of Command" and "The Gray Zone", Hersh alleged that the abuse stemmed from a top-secret
special access program (SAP) authorized by Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld during the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, which provided blanket approval for killings, kidnappings, and interrogations (at
Guantanamo Bay and
CIA black sites) of "high-value" targets. He alleged that the SAP was extended to Iraq's military prisons in 2003 to gather intelligence on
the growing insurgency, with Rumsfeld and
Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Stephen Cambone also extending its methods of physical coercion and sexual humiliation, under the name "
Copper Green". Pentagon spokesman
Lawrence Di Rita called the allegations "outlandish, conspiratorial, and filled with error and anonymous conjecture", and said they reflected "the fevered insights of those with little, if any, connection to the activities in the Department of Defense"; he added: "With these false claims, the Magazine and the reporter have made themselves part of the story." As the scandal grew and calls for Rumsfeld to resign mounted, he privately offered to step down, which Bush rejected. Later stories by other reporters revealed the
Torture Memos, in which the
Department of Justice had advised the Pentagon and the CIA on the legality of "
enhanced interrogation techniques". As after Hersh's reporting on the My Lai massacre, he garnered national and international attention and won multiple awards, including his fifth
George Polk Award. A book compiling and building on his post-9/11 reporting
, Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib, was published later in 2004. In July 2005, an article by Hersh alleged that the U.S. had covertly intervened in favor of
Ayad Allawi in the
January 2005 Iraqi parliamentary election, in an "off the books" campaign conducted by retired CIA officers and non-government personnel, and with funds "not necessarily" appropriated by Congress. In April 2006, Hersh's article "The Iran Plans" alleged that the Bush administration was accelerating military planning for an attack on Iran and that the Pentagon had presented the White House the option of using
bunker-buster nuclear weapons on Iran's underground
uranium enrichment sites; he further alleged that the
Joint Chiefs of Staff later sought to drop this option, which White House officials had resisted. The article also alleged that U.S. troops were infiltrating Iran to establish contact with anti-government minority groups and that
carrier-based aircraft were flying simulated nuclear bombing runs. Hersh wrote several more pieces on this alleged plan in the next two years, including a July 2006 article on how senior commanders were challenging Bush's plan for a major bombing campaign, articles in November 2006 and March 2007 on the plan's refocusing on targets in Iran aiding Iraqi militants, and an October 2007 article on planned "surgical" strikes on Iranian
Quds Force training camps and supply depots. In an August 2006 article, Hersh alleged that the U.S. was involved in the planning of Israel's attacks on
Hezbollah in the
2006 Lebanon War as a "prelude" to the U.S. bombing of Iran. In his March 2007 article "The Redirection", he alleged that the U.S. and Saudi Arabia were covertly supporting
Sunni extremist groups to combat the influence of
Shiite Iran and Syria, and that the Lebanese government of
Fouad Siniora was using its U.S. backing to supply weapons to
Osbat al-Ansar and
Fatah al-Islam, militant groups in
Palestinian refugee camps, to develop a counterbalance to Shiite-backed Hezbollah. In May 2007, Lebanon attacked Fatah al-Islam, which it accused of having ties to the Syrian government, starting
a severe domestic conflict. The article also alleged that Vice President
Dick Cheney, after
a January 2008 incident in the Strait of Hormuz in which a U.S. warship had nearly fired on Iranian boats, had held a meeting on how to create a
casus belli for a war; Hersh later said in an interview that one of the options discussed and rejected was a
false flag operation involving
Navy SEALs, who would pose as Iranian patrols and start a firefight with U.S. ships. Hersh later began writing a book on Cheney in 2011, on which he spent four years before quitting amid a crackdown on leaks, instead writing his 2018 memoir
Reporter. In his May 2011 article "Iran And the Bomb", Hersh alleged that the U.S. lacked conclusive evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons, citing a still-classified
National Intelligence Estimate by the
National Intelligence Council earlier that year. The summary of the 2007 estimate, which had been released publicly, had found "with high confidence" that Iran had halted its weapons program in late 2003 after the invasion of Iraq; Hersh alleged that the 2011 estimate found that this program had been aimed at Iraq (which Iran had believed to be developing a nuclear weapon), not Israel or the U.S., and that no new evidence had changed the 2007 assessment, despite expanded covert surveillance. In a November 2011 article after the release of a report by the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on possible military dimensions of Iran's nuclear program, Hersh disputed that the findings were new or transformative, arguing that there remained "no definitive evidence" of a weapons program and calling the report a "political document" in an interview.
Syria and chemical attacks In the early weeks of the Iraq War in 2003, Hersh traveled to
Damascus in Syria and interviewed President
Bashar al-Assad, whom he interviewed several more times in following years, the latest in 2010; he also interviewed
Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of
Hezbollah. An article by Hersh in April 2009, citing his email correspondence with Assad, suggested that Syria was eager for peace with Israel over the
Golan Heights, as well as negotiations with the U.S. over
its withdrawal from Iraq and Syria's support for
Hamas and
Hezbollah. Hersh concluded that the
Obama administration had a chance for diplomacy with Syria and perhaps Iran. The article, which had been rejected by
The New Yorker and
The Washington Post, alleged that U.S. intelligence had found by June 2013 that
al-Nusra, a branch of
al-Qaeda and part of the
Syrian opposition, was also capable of producing and deploying sarin gas. The article cited munitions expert
Theodore Postol, who judged that the rockets used in the attack were improvised, and that their estimated range of was inconsistent with a proposed flight path from a
Syrian Army base away. A
United Nations (UN) investigation concluded that sarin had been used at Ghouta, but did not assign responsibility for the attack. Blogger
Eliot Higgins and chemical weapons expert Dan Kaszeta disputed some of the claims in the articles with
open-source intelligence, writing that the Syrian Army had used the "improvised" rockets as early as November 2012 and that the front lines on the day of the attack were just from the impact sites, within Postol's estimated range. They also criticized the claim of al-Nusra responsibility, citing the high difficulty and expense of producing sarin, and the presence of
hexamine in the Ghouta samples, an additive that Syria later declared part of its chemical weapons program. In his December 2015
LRB article "Military to Military", Hersh alleged that the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, after discovering by mid-2013 that Turkey was aiding al-Nusra and the
Islamic State (ISIS) and that the moderate rebels were no longer viable, had sabotaged Obama's support for the rebels by sending U.S. intelligence to the militaries of Germany, Russia, and Israel, on the understanding it would be forwarded to Assad. In exchange for this support, aimed at defeating ISIS, Hersh alleged that the Joint Chiefs had required that Assad "restrain"
Hezbollah from attacking Israel, restart negotiations with Israel over the Golan Heights, agree to accept Russian advisers, and hold elections after the war. This alleged alliance ended in September 2015 upon the retirement of its architect, chairman General
Martin Dempsey. Max Fisher of
Vox criticized the narrative, citing reporting that Syria and Russia were primarily bombing anti-ISIS rebels instead of ISIS, and Dempsey's prominent public support for sending more arms to the rebels, over which he had clashed with Obama. On June 25, 2017, the German newspaper
Die Welt published Hersh's article "Trump's Red Line", which had been rejected by the
LRB. It alleged that the
Syrian Air Force's
April 4, 2017, attack at Khan Shaykhun was not a sarin attack but a conventional bombing conducted with Russian intelligence that struck a regional headquarters building with "fertilisers, disinfectants and other goods" in its basement, which created "effects similar to those of sarin". Higgins again criticized Hersh's claims, writing for
Bellingcat that they were inconsistent with Syrian and Russian descriptions of the target and satellite images of the impact sites, as well as findings of sarin and hexamine in samples retrieved by the
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). A later investigation by
a joint UN–OPCW panel found that the attack was a sarin bombing by the Syrian Air Force. In the 2025
documentary film Cover-Up, Hersh admits that his Syria reporting was flawed and that he had got the story wrong. Hersh had previously reflected on his
Substack about the
fall of the Assad regime, admitting that he was too trusting of Assad during their numerous meetings before the outbreak of the
Syrian civil war. Asked by
Laura Poitras in
Cover-Up if “that is an example of getting too close to power,” Hersh replies, “Of course.”
Killing of Osama bin Laden In a September 2013 interview, Hersh said that the U.S.'s account of the May 2, 2011, raid in
Abbottabad, Pakistan, which
killed Osama bin Laden was "one big lie, not one word of it is true". He said that both the
Obama administration and Pakistan had lied about the event, and that U.S. media outlets were reluctant to challenge the administration: "It's pathetic, they are more than obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama]". Hersh later said that his sources told him that the official story was false days after the raid, but that
The New Yorker had rejected his article pitches. On May 10, 2015, Hersh's article detailing an alternative account of the raid, "The Killing of Osama bin Laden", was published in the
London Review of Books. The official account was that bin Laden had been found through interrogation of detainees and surveillance of his courier, that Pakistan was unaware of the operation, and that he was killed only when he did not surrender; Hersh reported that bin Laden had been captured and held as a prisoner of Pakistan's
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) since 2006, that his location was revealed to the CIA by a former Pakistani intelligence officer in 2010, that top Pakistani military officials knew about the operation, and that bin Laden had been assassinated. The article alleged Pakistan had kept bin Laden, with financial support from Saudi Arabia, as leverage against
al-Qaeda, and that it agreed to give him up in exchange for increased U.S. military aid and a "freer hand in Afghanistan". Further allegations were that bin Laden's DNA had been collected by a Pakistani Army doctor, not by
Shakil Afridi in a
fake vaccination drive by the CIA; that the
Navy SEALs met no resistance at the compound, and were escorted by an ISI officer; that bin Laden's body was torn apart by rifle fire; and that pieces of his corpse were tossed out over the
Hindu Kush mountains on the flight back to
Jalalabad, not
buried at sea. Hersh's article was heavily criticized by other reporters. The narrative was similar to a little-known August 2011 post by national security blogger
R.J. Hillhouse, who called Hersh's article "either plagiarism or unoriginal", though she speculated they used different sources; Hersh denied having read her work. Both journalists, as well as
Jack Shafer at
Politico and
James Kirchick at
Slate, criticized Hersh's sources: an unnamed "retired senior [U.S.] intelligence official", "two longtime consultants to the
Special Operations Command", and retired Pakistani General
Asad Durrani, who headed the ISI from 1990 to 1992. Fisher wrote that this was "worryingly little evidence for a story that accuses hundreds of people across three governments of staging a massive international hoax that has gone on for years". Some details in Hersh's article were corroborated by
Carlotta Gall of
The New York Times, who reported that she had previously been told by a "high-level member" of the ISI that Pakistan had been hiding bin Laden and that an ISI brigadier had informed the CIA of his location;
NBC News also corroborated the claim of a retired ISI officer who had tipped off the CIA. Pakistani news outlets alleged the tipster was Brigadier Usman Khalid, who died in 2014. In an article in the
Columbia Journalism Review, Trevor Timm, executive director of the
Freedom of the Press Foundation, praised an article by
Ali Watkins of ''
The Huffington Post Nord Stream pipeline and Ukraine On February 8, 2023, in a newsletter article titled "How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline", Hersh alleged that the
September 26, 2022, sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, which had carried
natural gas from Russia to Germany through the
Baltic Sea, was carried out by the U.S. in a top-secret CIA operation ordered by President
Joe Biden, with collaboration from Norway. The self-published post, which relied on one anonymous source "with direct knowledge of the operational planning", alleged that U.S. Navy divers operating from a Norwegian ship, using
NATO's
BALTOPS 22 exercise in June 2022 as cover, had planted
C-4 mines which were later remotely detonated by a
sonar buoy dropped from a Norwegian plane. The alleged motive was reducing Russian economic influence in Europe and cutting off a major source of state revenue;
Nord Stream 2 was not yet operational, but would have doubled the gas supply of
Nord Stream 1. Hersh cited statements against the pipeline made by Biden and his foreign policy team as support, including Biden's warning in February 2022, before the
Russian invasion of Ukraine, that: "If Russia invades... there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." The party responsible for the attack, which rendered three of the four pipelines inoperable, was not widely known at the time of Hersh's report. Western countries had not formally accused Russia, though some officials suggested it was responsible; Kelly Vlahos, a senior advisor at the
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, described the U.S. mainstream media response to Hersh's post as a "total blackout", and wrote that his reporting "should have opened the floodgates of journalistic inquiry". The post received widespread attention in
independent media and European mainstream media, including in Germany; the
Bundestag held its first debate on the bombing on February 10, in which members from
Alternative for Germany (AfD) and
Die Linke cited Hersh and called on the executive branch to release the results of its investigation, which it had said would be kept secret. In Russia, Hersh's report was picked up by the state-owned media agencies
RT and
TASS. At a
UN Security Council meeting on February 21, Russia's representative
Vasily Nebenzya cited Hersh and called for an independent UN investigation. Hersh replied that the open-source location data could have been manipulated by spoofing or disabling transponders. In March 2023, the
New York Times reported that new intelligence suggested a "pro-Ukrainian group" was responsible for the attack, and the German newspaper
Die Zeit reported that German police found it was carried out by six people of unclear nationality diving from a yacht rented from a Ukrainian-owned Polish company. In a second post, Hersh alleged that this account was a
false flag fabrication created by the CIA and fed to U.S. and German outlets. In October 2024, the Swiss newspaper
Die Weltwoche wrote an article based on an interview given to Danish
Politiken by the
Christiansø port
harbourmaster on the second anniversary of the Nord Stream pipelines sabotage. While the Danish harbourmaster dismissed the many sabotage accusations as
conspiracy theories, the Swiss newspaper quoted him that he had sailed out to a fleet of US Navy ships sighted with inactive transponders near the position of the sabotage a few days before the sabotage happened and that the US fleet had requested him to turn around. The Swiss newspaper went on to note that the three months earlier had participated in BALTOPS 2022 that exercised unmanned underwater vehicles suitable for demining and other underwater operations, and that as such these vessels could transport explosive charges suitable for blowing the Nord Stream pipelines. The Swiss newspaper claimed this new information calls into question the assumption that a Ukrainian group was responsible for the sabotage and that investigations are continuing. In an April 2023 article, Hersh alleged that figures in the Ukrainian government of
Volodymyr Zelensky had embezzled at least $400 million of U.S. aid to the country, intended for the purchase of
diesel fuel, by buying discount diesel from Russia, citing an alleged analysis produced by the CIA. == Other statements ==