Accusations of terrorism After the defeat in the presidential elections, Otelo Saraiva de Carvalho, together with Pedro Goulart and Mouta Liz, founded the Global Project (Projeto Global). It, "
...aimed, among others, to create conditions that would allow its members, in the long term and through the armed insurrection, to seize the State and install popular power through the institutionalization of what they called direct and grassroots democracy and subvert the functioning of the institutions of the State enshrined in the Constitution, as this is one of the adequate conditions for the aforementioned armed insurrection...". The initiative united the most radical factions of the revolutionary far-left, who opposed the establishment of a party-based parliamentary representative system and the restoration of a capitalist economic and social order.
Forças Populares 25 de Abril killed 20 people in several terrorist attacks. Just two weeks later, a
National Republican Guard (GNR) soldier was killed during a bank robbery. Over 7 years, they were responsible for 19 deaths, including a four-month-old baby, The General Director of Prison Service, a dissident/repentant terrorist, several GNR soldiers and five terrorists killed during robberies or clashes with security forces. FP-25's last action resulted in the death of a Judiciary Police officer, in August 1987.
Forças Populares 25 de Abril killed up to 20 people in several terrorist attacks. The violence was partially stopped in June 1984, with a secret police operation codenamed
"Orion", which resulted in the arrest of most of its leaders and operatives. They were later tried in October 1986".
Arrest and preventive detention On 20 June 1984, Otelo was arrested on charges of being a Forças Populares 25 de Abril founding member and leader. During
"Orion" police operation, various incriminating documents were seized at FUP headquarters, as well as at Otelo 's residence. Among the seized documents were the two notebooks handwritten by Otelo, one green and one red, containing detailed reports of operations and meetings, including the infamous Conclave meeting in Serra da Estrela. Cândida Almeida, prosecutor in the trial recalls one of the most famous meetings, held in
Serra da Estrela where everyone was hooded, Otelo had the number seven. Today it would be possible to do the
DNA of the hood, but Otelo also never denied that he had been there. At the Conclave, a discussion was held regarding future strategy, one of its most important documents was nº 16. It's a guideline for violence defining who and how should be carried out the robberies and homicides, Otelo has written with his hand that he was content to know what the profile of the individual to be slaughtered. He and others in the military-political leadership were fully aware of the actions being carried out, making them moral authors of these acts. Those handwritten notebooks by Otelo are part of the case file and were reproduced in several books alluding to the process. Otelo himself acknowledges having been present with a hood at the Conclave meeting, held in Serra da Estrela. According to him, in an interview with
Expresso newspaper, it would have been a requirement of the ECA (Armed Civilian Structure), known as Forças Populares 25 de Abril. Usually, Otelo recorded in his personal notebook everything that was said at the meetings of Political-Military Board Projecto Global (FP-25) identifying all the people present by abbreviations and very enlightening and detailing everything that had been said by each of the authors. Otelo's notebooks were, in fact, responsible for incriminating him as well as many of the detainees, as well as clarifying many of the organization's actions. At the hearings, in addition to confessing almost the entirety of the facts, Otelo was unable to provide the least plausible explanation for the crimes he was accused of and it turned out that they were not only false accusations that supported the accusation, but a source of evidence, in which his manuscript stands out, where everything is reported with acronyms and names, which he was unveiled during the hearings.
Judgment and amnesty on political offences In October 1985, Otelo was tried and convicted in court for his role in leading the FP 25 de Abril and sentenced to 15 years in prison. The sentence would be confirmed by the Court of Appeal, which increased the sentence to 18 years and later the Supreme Court of Justice would fix it at 17 years in prison. He would appeal the sentence to the Constitutional Court, which would rule the sentence unconstitutional twice and leave the process at a legal impasse. The
Constitutional Court reverted the sentence due to unconstitutionality, as the newly formed body to comply with EU regulations did not agree with the other courts interpretation of the legal code in face of the new constitution, and wanted a full retrial by the same judges.
pt:Movimento Democrático de Libertação de Portugal The parliament being of left wing majority, supported by the socialist
PS and the communist party
PCP, was relevant to its approval. For the approval of the amnesty, the parliament justified that "the legal complexity has made extremely difficult its legal solution. (…) with developments that do not presume the possibility of a just solution in reasonable time." Relevant to note that amnesty is not equivalent to pardon, as it applies to whom has not been convicted, forgetting eventual committed crimes.
Judgement and acquittal on blood crimes He was further trialled for the assassinations, but was acquitted in 2001 and 2003. Even with the possibility of appealing to the Supreme Court of Justice, the Public Prosecutor's Office allowed the appeal period to pass when it had committed to the repentant ones to fight until the last instance for their exemptions from punishment. This led the Attorney General's Office to launch an inquiry to determine responsibilities. A prosecutor was held responsible for having been responsible for this prescription. ==Later life and death==