Size Patriofelis is the largest oxyaenid from which postcranial remains are known. Wortman suggested that its overall body size was roughly equal to that of a black bear, though was working under the assumption of felid affinities. In a 2010 publication, Michael Morlo, Gregg F. Gunnell, and Doris Nagel provided general body mass estimates for both
Patriofelis species of . In a 2024 paper, Mark S. Juhn and colleagues used a scaling method proposed by Van Valkenburgh in 1990, wherein the size of the largest lower
molar was used in a
regression analysis, to calculate the body sizes of various extinct mammalian predators, listing their mass estimates in their supplemental materials. Using this method they obtained a body mass of for
P. ulta, and a larger body mass of for the larger
P. ferox. or to those of
hyaenids. True bone-crushing is unlikely, at least in
Patriofelis, as
P. ulta's dentition overall lacks adaptations for
durophagy. The limbs of
Patriofelis, particularly its forelimbs, were fairly short and robust. The
deltopectoral crest of the
humerus (the
long bone of the upper forelimb) was "immensely developed", extending two-thirds down the length of the humeral shaft. Regressions found the humeri of
Patriofelis to have been more robust than any
felid. In the case of
P. ferox, the scar on the deltoid of the deltopectoral crest was located more distally than a felid of comparable size. The bones of the forearm were extremely robust, especially the
ulna. The ulna had a very robust, medially angled
olecranon; it and the
semilunar notch account for about a third of the bone's total length, longer than that of carnivorans. Though some have interpreted the morphology of the
radius as a sign that
Patriofelis was capable only of limited arm rotation, it is likely that it was capable of a strong degree of both
pronation and
supination. The
metacarpals (the bones of the forefeet) were short and robust, arranged and angled in such a way that the feet would likely have been splayed in life, and the same is true of the hind feet. Each digit was tipped in thick, blunt claws. The
ilium of
Patriofelis was fairly small compared to the
ischium and
pubis, and was trihedral in cross-section due to the presence of a pronounced ridge running along its lateral surface. The
acetabulum was fairly shallow. The trochanteric
fossa of the
femur (the long bone of the upper hindlimb) was deep, extending quite far down the posterior part of the bone. The distal portion of the femur is not known, so the full extent of the fossa is not certain, though it exceeds what is seen in carnivorans. The
tibia is slender in comparison to the femur, though is still fairly robust. It bore a prominent
cnemial crest, larger than that of
Oxyaena. The proximal end of the
fibula is characterised by a very robust interosseous crest (one between the tibia and fibula). The patellas (kneecaps) of
Patriofelis were similar to those of carnivorans, being generally teardrop-shaped. The
calcaneum was fairly robust and generally resembled that of carnivorans with a
plantigrade gait, one where the entire foot, including the heel, was pressed flat on the ground while walking. The
metatarsals were relatively short and were quite homogenous in length, although the first was shorter than the others and the third was longer. == Palaeobiology ==