As with the dry sand part of a beach, legal and political disputes can arise over the ownership and use of the foreshore. One recent example is the
New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy. In legal discussions, the foreshore is often referred to as the
wet-sand area. For privately owned beaches in the
United States, some states such as
Massachusetts use the low-water mark as the dividing line between the property of the State and that of the beach owner; however the public still has fishing, fowling, and navigation rights to the zone between low and high water. Other states such as California use the high-water mark. In the
United Kingdom, the foreshore is generally deemed to be owned by
the Crown, with exceptions for what are termed
several fisheries, which can be historic deeds to title, dating back to
King John's time or earlier, and the
Udal Law, which applies generally in
Orkney and
Shetland. In
Greece, according to the L. 2971/01, the foreshore zone is defined as the area of the coast that might be reached by the maximum climbing of the waves on the coast (maximum wave run-up on the coast) in their maximum capacity (maximum referring to the "usually maximum winter waves" and of course not to exceptional cases, such as
tsunamis). The foreshore zone, a part of the exceptions of the law, is public, and permanent constructions are not allowed on it. In Italy, about half the shoreline is owned by the government but leased to private beach clubs called lidos. In the
East African and West Indian Ocean, intertidal zone management is often neglected of being a priority due to there being no intent for collective economic productivity. According to workshops performing questionaries, it is stated that eighty-six percent of respondents believe mismanagement of mangrove and coastal ecosystems are due to lack of knowledge to steward the ecosystems, yet forty-four percent of respondents state that there is a fair amount of knowledge used in those regions for fisheries. == Threats ==