The character and fortunes of Ronsard's works are among the most remarkable in
literary history, and supply in themselves a kind of illustration of the progress of
French literature during the last three centuries. It was long his fortune to be almost always extravagantly admired or violently attacked. At first, as has been said, the enmity, not altogether unprovoked, of the friends and followers of Marot fell to his lot, then the still fiercer antagonism of the Huguenot faction, who, happening to possess a poet of great merit in Du Bartas, were able to attack Ronsard at his tenderest point. But fate had by no means done its worst with him in his lifetime. After his death the classical reaction set in under the auspices of
Malherbe, who seems to have been animated with a sort of personal hatred of Ronsard, though it is not clear that they ever met. After
Malherbe, the rising glory of
Corneille and his contemporaries obscured the tentative and unequal work of the Pléiade, which was, moreover, directly attacked by
Boileau himself, the dictator of French criticism in the last half of the 17th century. Then Ronsard was, except by a few men of taste, such as
Jean de La Bruyère and
Fénelon, forgotten when he was not sneered at. In this condition he remained during the whole 18th century and the first quarter of the 19th. The
Romantic revival, seeing in him a victim of its special
bête noire Boileau, and attracted by his splendid diction, rich metrical faculty, and combination of classical and medieval peculiarities, adopted his name as a kind of battle-cry, and for the moment exaggerated his merits somewhat. The critical work of
Sainte-Beuve in his
Tableau de la littérature française au 16ème siècle, and later of other authors, has established Ronsard's reputation. Ronsard was the acknowledged chief of the
Pléiade and its most voluminous poet. He was probably also its best, though a few isolated pieces of Belleau excel him in airy lightness of touch. Several sonnets of Du Bellay exhibit the melancholy of the Renaissance more perfectly than anything of his, and the finest passages of the
Tragiques and the ''Divine Sep'Maine
surpass his work in command of the alexandrine and in power of turning it to the purposes of satirical invective and descriptive narration. But that work is very extensive (we possess at a rough guess not much short of a hundred thousand lines of his), and it is extraordinarily varied in form. He did not introduce the sonnet into France, but he practised it soon after its introduction and with skill — the famous "Quand vous serez bien vieille''" being one of the acknowledged gems of French literature. , named in reference to Ronsard's poem
Ode à Cassandre (
Mignonne, allons voir si la rose...) His many odes are interesting, and at best are fine compositions. He began by imitating the strophic arrangement of the ancients, but very soon had the wisdom to desert this for a kind of adjustment of the Horatian ode to rhyme, instead of exact quantitative metre. In this latter kind he devised some exquisitely melodious rhythms of which, till our own day, the secret died with the 17th century. His more sustained work sometimes displays a bad selection of measure; and his
occasional poetry—epistles,
eclogues, elegies, etc.--is injured by its vast volume. But the preface to the
Franciade is a fine piece of verse, superior (it is in alexandrines) to the poem itself. In general, Ronsard is best in his amatory verse (the long series of sonnets and odes to Cassandre, Pikles, Marie, Genévre, Héléne—Héléne de Surgeres, a later and mainly "literary" love—etc.), and in his descriptions of the country (the famous "
Ode à Cassandre," the "
Fontaine Bellerie," the "
Forêt de Gastine," and so forth), which are graceful and fresh. He used the graceful diminutives which his school set in fashion. He knew well too how to manage the gorgeous adjectives ("
marbrine," "
cinabrine," "
ivoirine" and the like) which were another fancy of the Pléiade. In short, Ronsard shows eminently the two great attractions of French 16th-century poetry as compared with that of the two following ages - magnificence of language and imagery and graceful variety of metre. ==Bibliography==