e'' are visible on the left, the ambon and altar in the lower picture. Despite its architectural prominence, very little is known of the church's history and its precise architecture. Most of the information on the church's original appearance is derived from the epigram in honour of Juliana and her family, which was inscribed in pieces in various parts of the church. Martin Harrison, the site's chief excavator, has reconstructed the church as a roughly square
basilica, ca. 52 m long on the sides, with a central nave and two side
aisles, fronted by a
narthex and preceded by a large
atrium of 26 m length. To the north of the atrium, remains of another building have been identified as either the church's
baptistery or Juliana's palace. An oval substructure in the building's center indicates the position of the
ambon, while strong foundations throughout the building indicate, according to Harrison, the presence of a
dome, bringing the estimated height of the building to over 30 m. The area of the
altar was not sufficiently excavated, and its shape remains unknown. The possible presence of a dome, although not universally accepted, is of major importance, since it would mean that it was St. Polyeuctus, and not Justinian's churches (
Saints Sergius and Bacchus and the Hagia Sophia), which first combined the traditional
basilica with a dome. From the epigram, we know that the interior featured two storeys with colonnades and galleries. Based on the epigram and the substructures, Harrison also posited the existence of a pair of two-storey
exedrae, composed of three niches with a pier in between, on the northern and southern sides of the ambo. The spaces around the domed western
bay would have been covered with
barrel or
cross-vaults. The interior decoration was extraordinarily rich. The walls were decorated with marble, the roof was gilded, while the
narthex featured a depiction of the baptism of
Constantine the Great. Another exceptional find are ten relief plaques bearing the images of
Christ, the
Virgin Mary and the
Apostles; such images are very rare due to the destruction of human representations in the
Iconoclasm of the 8th and 9th centuries. One of the largest decorative marble remains of the site is the niche-head pieces. These massive pieces of marble consist of a concave segment with a large frontal peacock carved in the center, tail fanned out proud. The second epigram of the church runs along the semicircle of the carving. Surrounding the peacocks are the spandrels filled with grape vines and leaves. The inscription's letters are raised 11 cm high, and surrounded by realistic grape vines. The detail involved in every individual leaf is remarkable. Each leaf has visible veins, some edges of the leaves are frayed and torn, and the artist even took the time to layer the design, pulling some leaves forward, and carving others in the background, giving the sense of depth. Martin Harrison notes that this workmanship is all done by the artist’s eye, and with no use of a constant measure, as indicated by the marks made by the chisel, minute irregularities, and slight bends in the lattice work. This area was originally painted in vibrant colors. The primary colors used were blues, greens, and some purples. These colors are difficult to find or make and show Anicia Juliana’s power in the decorative aspect of the structure. The background to vines and letters was a bright blue. The peacocks—associated with the goddess
Hera and royalty in Antiquity and symbolizing renewal and rebirth for Christians —adorned with carved necklaces, were painted in blues, greens and gold. Due to the empty cavities in the eyes of the remaining bird head pieces, green glass was used for the pupils. They also held chains to suspend something. Connor suggests due to their location, a lamp is a believable use for the chains in their beaks. ==Gallery==