Goparaja's posthumous inscription at Eran, dated 510 CE, is of particular significance here. It refers to King Bhanugupta as "the bravest man on the earth" and reports a great battle at Eran, in which his general
Goparaja was killed. The battle would have been against the Huna invaders, either to check their advance into eastern
Malwa or to expel them from the region entirely. If the aim had been to check their advance, it is safe to put Toramana's conquest of eastern Malwa around 510 CE; otherwise, if the aim had been expulsion, the battle would have occurred earlier. Although the occupation of the region by the Huna cannot be pinpointed as accurately as we would like, it can be inferred that Toramana's penetration into India proper occurred some years after 500 CE, and the Hunas were initially confined to
Gandhara. By 510 CE, Toramana's hold over Malwa may be assumed to be firmly in place. • (Lines 1-2) Ōm ! When a century of years, increased by ninety-one, (had elapsed) on the seventh lunar day of the dark fortnight of (the month)
Śrāvaṇa, (or in figures) the year 100 (and) 90 (and) 1 (the month) Śrāvaṇa the dark fortnight; the (lunar) day 7;- • (Verse 1) (there was) a ruler, renowned as . . . .
rāja sprung from the Śulakkha lineage; and his son (was) valorous by the name (of) Mādhava. • (Verse 2) His son was the illustrious
Goparaja, renowned for manliness; the daughter's son of the Sarabha king;1 who became the ornament of (his) family. • (Verses 3-4) (There is) the glorious
Bhanugupta, a distinguished hero on earth, a mighty ruler, brave being equal to
Pârtha. And along with him
Goparaja, following (him) without fear, having overtaken the
Maittras and having fought a very big and famous battle, went to heaven, becoming equal to
Indra, the best of the gods; and (his) devoted, attached, beloved, and beauteous wife, clinging (to him), entered into the mass of fire (funeral pyre). (Bhanugupta
Eran inscription 510 CE.) According to
Hans T. Bakker, the inscription does not contain an explicit statement regarding the success or failure of the battle. From the events that follow, it may be inferred that the inscription marks the beginning of a chain of woes for the Huna conqueror. In his struggle against the invader, Bhanugupta might have had the backing of the person of King Prakāśadharman, the king of
Mandasor. of Rājyavardhana, father of Prakāśadharman. Bhagavaddosa, Ravikīrti's son and Bhānugupta's nephew (or another relation), was prime minister to Prakāśadharman and may have participated in military campaigns under his maternal uncle. It is presumed that this new line of Mandasor kings, referred to as the '
Later Aulikaras', was to challenge their erstwhile Gupta overlords. == Aftermath ==