For most of Harper's tenure as prime minister, he led a
minority government meaning he relied on the support (or abstention) of other parties to maintain the
confidence of the House of Commons. The Harper government often relied on the official opposition Liberal caucus abstaining in whole or in part to allow confidence measures to pass. The government lost its first confidence vote on a Liberal-sponsored censure motion on March 25, 2011, prompting Harper to seek dissolution and the calling of the 2011 general election.
Confidence in the House of Commons The principal motions of confidence in the Canadian House of Commons are matters of supply (motions and bills concerning the budget and spending government monies) and the motion in reply to the
Speech from the Throne. The government may also designate any vote to be a matter of confidence, and opposition parties may introduce motions that explicitly express a lack of confidence in the government. During this period of Harper's tenureship, he began to increase the scope of what bills of the government could be considered confidence measures, reflecting the increasing willingness of the government to trigger an election based on favourable polling conditions.
Non-confidence motion and prorogation of Parliament, 2008 Harper precipitated a national controversy, which threatened to overturn his government, by fielding a spending bill in the fall of 2008 which would have stripped taxpayer funding from political parties and taken away the
right to strike from Canadian public service workers as purported solutions to the effects in Canada of the
global economic crisis. Outraged opposition parties formed a coalition intending to call a vote of non-confidence that would have toppled the Harper government, but he avoided the impending vote of non-confidence by asking the Governor General to
prorogue Parliament until January 26, 2009. Following the resumption of parliament, Harper introduced a new budget which was allowed to pass when members of the Liberal caucus voted for the budget with an amendment to budget motion.
Senate appointments As prime minister, Harper recommended the appointment of 38 persons to the
Senate of Canada. All of these senators were members of Harper's Conservative Party. Three (
Michael Fortier,
Fabian Manning, and
Larry Smith) subsequently resigned from the Senate to seek election to the House of Commons. Harper had long been an advocate of an elected Senate and appointed four senators (
Bert Brown,
Betty Unger,
Doug Black, and
Scott Tannas) based on the result of
Alberta Senate nominee elections. Harper introduced legislation to provide for elections to advise the prime minister on whom to recommend for appointment to the Senate and to cause appointed senators to serve fixed terms, to, in essence, create a
de facto elected Senate without changing the constitution. Harper's Senate appointments and reform proposals were criticized for failing to address the balance of seats among provinces, possibly being unconstitutional, and for running contrary to the spirit of his previous pledges for an elected senate. Harper argued that, without appointing senators, the Liberals would have continued to enjoy a majority in the Senate despite lacking popular support, the Senate would become less and less able to function, and all of his appointees agreed to resign and seek election to the senate should his reform proposals pass.
Libel suit against Liberal Party Harper launched a lawsuit on March 13, 2008, against the
Liberal Party of Canada over statements published on the party's website concerning the
Chuck Cadman affair. This was the first time a sitting prime minister had sued the opposition for libel. The $2.5-million suit was named "The Liberal Party, the Federal Liberal Agency of Canada, and the unnamed author or authors of the statements published on the Liberal website". The articles at the centre of the lawsuit were headlined "Harper knew of Conservative bribery" and "Harper must come clean about allegations of Conservative Bribery". Those articles questioned Harper's alleged involvement in financial offers made to Cadman to sway his vote in a crucial 2005 Commons showdown. The suit filed in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice did not name Liberal Leader
Stéphane Dion or MPs
Ralph Goodale and
Michael Ignatieff—whom Harper had also threatened to sue. The lawsuit was settled out of court in 2009 with both parties not disclosing the terms of settlement.
Dona Cadman said that before the May 2005 budget vote,
Tom Flanagan and Doug Finley, two
Conservative Party officials, offered her husband, Chuck Cadman, a million-dollar life insurance policy in exchange for his vote to bring down the Liberal government. ==Domestic and foreign policy==