Gideon Mantell, Sir Richard Owen, and the discovery of dinosaurs The discovery of
Iguanodon has long been accompanied by a popular
legend. The story posits that
Gideon Mantell's wife,
Mary Ann, discovered the first teeth of an
Iguanodon in the strata of
Tilgate Forest in
Whitemans Green,
Sussex, England, in 1822 while her husband was visiting a patient. However, there is no evidence that Mantell took his wife with him while seeing patients. Furthermore, he admitted in 1851 that he himself had found the teeth, although he had previously stated in 1827 and 1833 that Mrs. Mantell had indeed found the first of the teeth later named
Iguanodon. Other later authors agree that the story is not certainly false. It is known from his notebooks that Mantell first acquired large fossil bones from the quarry at Whitemans Green in 1820. Because also
theropod teeth were found, thus belonging to carnivores, he at first interpreted these bones, which he tried to combine into a partial skeleton, as those of a giant
crocodile. In 1821 Mantell mentioned the find of herbivorous teeth and began to consider the possibility that a large herbivorous reptile was present in the strata. However, in his 1822 publication
Fossils of the South Downs he as yet did not dare to suggest a connection between the teeth and his very incomplete skeleton, presuming that his finds presented two large forms, one carnivorous ("an animal of the Lizard Tribe of enormous magnitude"), the other herbivorous. In May 1822 he first presented the herbivorous teeth to the
Royal Society of London but the members, among them
William Buckland, dismissed them as
fish teeth or the incisors of a
rhinoceros from a
Tertiary stratum. On 23 June 1823
Charles Lyell showed some to
Georges Cuvier, during a soiree in
Paris, but the famous French naturalist at once dismissed them as those of a rhinoceros. Though the very next day Cuvier retracted, Lyell reported only the dismissal to Mantell, who became rather diffident about the issue. In 1824 Buckland described
Megalosaurus and was on that occasion invited to visit Mantell's collection. Seeing the bones on 6 March he agreed that these were of some giant saurian—though still denying it was a herbivore. Emboldened nevertheless, Mantell again sent some teeth to Cuvier, who answered on 22 June 1824 that he had determined that they were reptilian and quite possibly belonged to a giant herbivore. In a new edition that year of his
Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles Cuvier admitted his earlier mistake, leading to an immediate acceptance of Mantell, and his new saurian, in scientific circles. Mantell tried to corroborate his theory further by finding a modern-day parallel among extant reptiles. He neglected to add a
specific name to form a proper
binomial, but one was supplied in 1829 by Friedrich Holl:
I. anglicum, which was later emended to
I. anglicus. Mantell formally published his findings on 10 February 1825, when he presented a paper on the remains to the
Royal Society of London. The discovery of much better specimens in later years revealed that the horn was actually a modified thumb. Still encased in rock, the Maidstone skeleton is currently displayed at the
Natural History Museum in
London. The borough of Maidstone commemorated this find by adding an
Iguanodon as a
supporter to their
coat of arms in 1949. This specimen has become linked with the name
I. mantelli, a species named in 1832 by
Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer in place of
I. anglicus, but it actually comes from a different
formation than the original
I. mantelli/
I. anglicus material. as cf.
Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis by Norman (2012); In 1849, a few years before his death in 1852, Mantell realised that iguanodonts were not heavy,
pachyderm-like animals, as Owen was putting forward, but had slender forelimbs. However, since his passing left him unable to participate in the creation of the
Crystal Palace dinosaur sculptures, Owen's vision of the dinosaurs became that seen by the public for decades.
Bernissart mine discoveries and Dollo's new reconstruction The largest find of
Iguanodon remains to that date occurred on 28 February 1878 in a coal mine at
Bernissart in
Belgium, at a depth of , In 1882, the holotype specimen of
I. bernissartensis became one of the first ever dinosaur skeletons mounted for display. It was put together in a chapel at the
Palace of Charles of Lorraine using a series of adjustable ropes attached to scaffolding so that a lifelike pose could be achieved during the mounting process. a larger and much more robust animal than the English remains had yet revealed. One specimen, IRSNB 1551, was at first referred to the nebulous, gracile
I. mantelli, but is currently referred to
Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis. The skeletons were some of the first complete dinosaur skeletons known. Found with the dinosaur skeletons were the remains of plants, fish, and other reptiles, The science of conserving fossil remains was in its infancy, and new techniques had to be improvised to deal with what soon became known as "
pyrite disease". Crystalline pyrite in the bones was being
oxidized to
iron sulphate, accompanied by an increase in volume that caused the remains to crack and crumble. When in the ground, the bones were isolated by anoxic moist clay that prevented this from happening, but when removed into the drier open air, the natural chemical conversion began to occur. To limit this effect, De Pauw immediately, in the mine-gallery, re-covered the dug-out fossils with wet clay, sealing them with paper and plaster reinforced by iron rings, forming in total about six hundred transportable blocks with a combined weight of a hundred and thirty tons. In Brussels after opening the plaster he impregnated the bones with boiling
gelatine mixed with
oil of cloves as a
preservative. Removing most of the visible pyrite he then hardened them with
hide glue, finishing with a final layer of
tin foil. Damage was repaired with
papier-mâché. This treatment had the unintended effect of sealing in moisture and extending the period of damage. In 1932 museum director
Victor van Straelen decided that the specimens had to be completely restored again to safeguard their preservation. From December 1935 to August 1936 the staff at the museum in Brussels treated the problem with a combination of
alcohol,
arsenic, and 390 kilograms of
shellac. This combination was intended to simultaneously penetrate the fossils (with alcohol), prevent the development of mould (with arsenic), and harden them (with shellac). The fossils entered a third round of conservation from 2003 until May 2007, when the shellac, hide glue and gelatine were removed and impregnated with
polyvinyl acetate and
cyanoacrylate and
epoxy glues. Modern treatments of this problem typically involve either monitoring the humidity of fossil storage, or, for fresh specimens, preparing a special coating of
polyethylene glycol that is then heated in a vacuum pump, so that moisture is immediately removed and pore spaces are infiltrated with polyethylene glycol to seal and strengthen the fossil. His reconstruction would prevail for a long period of time, but would later be discounted. During
World War I, when the town was occupied by
German forces, preparations were made to reopen the mine for palaeontology, and
Otto Jaekel was sent from
Berlin to supervise. Just as the first fossiliferous layer was about to be uncovered, however, the German army surrendered and had to withdraw. Further attempts to reopen the mine were hindered by financial problems and were stopped altogether in 1921 when the mine flooded.
Turn of the century and the Dinosaur Renaissance Research on
Iguanodon decreased during the early part of the 20th century as World Wars and the
Great Depression enveloped Europe. A new species that would become the subject of much study and taxonomic controversy,
I. atherfieldensis, was named in 1925 by
R. W. Hooley, for a specimen collected at Atherfield Point on the
Isle of Wight.
Iguanodon was not part of the initial work of the
dinosaur renaissance that began with the description of
Deinonychus in 1969, but it was not neglected for long.
David B. Weishampel's work on ornithopod feeding mechanisms provided a better understanding of how it fed, and
David B. Norman's work on numerous aspects of the genus has made it one of the best-known dinosaurs. In addition, a further find of numerous disarticulated
Iguanodon bones in Nehden,
Nordrhein-Westphalen, Germany, has provided evidence for gregariousness in this genus, as the animals in this
areally restricted find appear to have been killed by
flash floods. At least 15 individuals, from long, have been found here, most of the individuals belong to the related
Mantellisaurus (described as
I. atherfieldensis, at that time believed to be another species of
Iguanodon). but some are of
I. bernissartensis. One major revision to
Iguanodon brought by the Renaissance would be another re-thinking of how to reconstruct the animal. A major flaw with Dollo's reconstruction was the bend he introduced into the
tail. This organ was more or less straight, as shown by the skeletons he was excavating, and the presence of ossified tendons. In fact, to get the bend in the tail for a more wallaby or
kangaroo-like posture, the tail would have had to be broken. With its correct, straight tail and back, the animal would have walked with its body held horizontal to the ground, arms in place to support the body if needed.
21st century research and the splitting of the genus In the 21st century,
Iguanodon material has been used in the search for dinosaur
biomolecules. In research by Graham Embery et al. (2003),
Iguanodon bones were processed to look for remnant
proteins. In this research, identifiable remains of typical bone proteins, such as
phosphoproteins and
proteoglycans, were found in a
rib. In 2007,
Gregory S. Paul split
I. atherfieldensis into a new, separate genus,
Mantellisaurus which has been generally accepted. In 2009 fragmentary iguanodontid material was described from upper Barremian
Paris Basin deposits in
Auxerre,
Burgundy. While not definitively diagnosable to the genus/species level, the specimen shares "obvious morphological and dimensional affinities" with
I. bernissartensis. In 2010,
David Norman split the
Valanginian species
I. dawsoni and
I. fittoni into
Barilium and
Hypselospinus respectively.'' In 2011, a new genus
Delapparentia was named for a specimen in Spain that was originally thought to belong to
I. bernissartensis. In 2025, Franco Sancarlo, Davide Mandorlo and Tracy L. Ford assigned
I. galvensis to a new genus,
Paulodon, based on putative differences between it and
I. bernissartensis; although paleontologists have informally disagreed with the methodology behind the paper. In 2026, Rotatori and colleagues suggested that
Delapperantia is a distinct taxon more closely related to
Magnamanus and "
I."
galvensis, the latter of which they suggested that a new genus name would be required. ==Description==