followed the
September 11 attacks, the beginning of the
2003 Iraq conflict, and the
capture of
Saddam Hussein. Bush began his presidency with
approval ratings near 50%. Following the
September 11 attacks, Bush held approval ratings of greater than 85%, among the highest for any President. Since then, his approval ratings and approval of his handling of domestic, economic, and foreign policy issues steadily declined, and despite consistent efforts to do so, President Bush and his administration were unable to rally public support for the last three years, with each year seeing a steady decline in the Administration's support level to the point of Bush eventually dropping to a 19% approval rating and 77% disapproval rating, both records for a sitting president. In 2002, Bush had the highest approval rating of any president during a midterm congressional election since
Dwight D. Eisenhower. In an unusual deviation from the historical trend of midterm elections, the Republican Party regained control of the
Senate and added to its majority in the
House of Representatives. Typically, the President's party loses congressional seats in the midterm elections; 2002 marked only the third midterm election since the
Civil War that the party in control of the White House gained seats in both houses of Congress (others were
1902 and
1934). In 2003, Bush's approval spiked upward at the time of the
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster in February. The upward trend continued through the
invasion of Iraq in March. By late 2003, when presidential opponents began their campaigns in earnest, his approval numbers were in the low to middle 50s. Most polls tied the decline to growing concern over the
US-led occupation of Iraq and a slow recovery from the 2001 recession. Polls of May 2004 showed anywhere from a 53% to a 46% approval rating. In April 2006, the president's approval continued to decline. Four states continue to maintain a positive approval rating: Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, and Nebraska. His disapproval rating in traditionally
red states had risen, with higher than 60% of voters disapproving in Ohio, Florida, Arkansas, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado, Virginia, Missouri, and Iowa. Even in his conservative-spun home state of Texas, disapproval reached 51 percent. His disapproval rating in several American states had reached an all-time high, with more than 70% disapproving in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Delaware, Vermont, and New York. His highest approval rating stood at 55% in Utah, and his lowest, 24%, in Rhode Island. In polls conducted between August 7 and 16, 2006, Bush's average approval rating was 37.0%, and his average disapproval rating was 57.3%. A poll taken in mid September 2006 indicated that 48 percent of Americans believed the war with Iraq has made the US less safe, while 41 percent believed the war has made the US safer from terrorism. Another poll shows that a majority of Americans, by a margin of 61 to 35 percent, believe that the United States is not better off because of Bush's policies. At the conclusion of 2006, an AP-
AOL News telephone poll of 1,004 adults found Bush to be both the "top villain" and "top hero" of the year. Earlier polls asked conditional versions of the impeachment question. For example,
Zogby International on November 2, 2005, asked whether respondents agreed with the statement, "If President Bush did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should consider holding him accountable through impeachment." Americans agreed with this, 53% to 42%. A poll by
Newsweek on October 19, 2006, revealed that 51% of respondents believed that the impeachment of Bush should be a priority. An August 2008 poll found that 41% of Americans thought that Bush is the worst President in United States history, while 50% disagreed. Bush's critics have questioned his leadership skills regarding some events. One occasion was on the moment of the
September 11 World Trade Center attacks: after being told by Chief of Staff
Andrew Card that the US was "under attack", Bush continued with a reading lesson with elementary school children for seven minutes. Democratic 2004 presidential candidate
John Kerry cited Bush's lack of swift action, calling into question the incumbent's leadership capabilities, and concluding: "Americans want to know that the person they choose as president has all the skills and ability, all of the mental toughness, all of the gut instinct necessary to be a strong commander in chief." The
9/11 Commission later released a summary of Bush's closed-door testimony, which stated that Bush's "instinct was to project calm, not to have the country see an excited reaction at a moment of crisis". It went on to say "The President felt he should project strength and calm until he could better understand what was happening." This was impossible, as no televised footage of the first plane crashing into the tower was broadcast until the afternoon of that day. The
White House explained his remarks as "a mistaken recollection".
Domestic policy Domestic criticism of Bush has waxed and waned throughout his administration. Before 9/11, Bush was reviled by the bulk of the American
left, mostly for his role in the controversial 2000 election, and for his
No Child Left Behind education program. After Bush was re-elected, he made
Social Security reform a top priority. He proposed options to permit Americans to divert a portion of their Social Security tax (FICA) into secured investments, creating a "nest egg" that he claimed would enjoy steady growth. This led Democrats to label the program a "
privatization" of Social Security. Bush embarked on a 60-day tour to shore up public support for the plan, attacking the political reaction against reforms. Ultimately, Congressional Republicans could not reach a consensus on the plan, and the Democrats were unanimously opposed. Bush was left without any political will to pass his reforms. The issue was dropped, and the status quo maintained. Bush had been increasingly forced to defend his actions on many fronts and had been unable to generate widespread support in the nation as a whole. After the Democratic Party regained control of both houses of Congress in the
2006 midterm elections,
MSNBC reported that "The war in Iraq, scandals in Congress and declining support for Bush and Republicans on Capitol Hill defined the battle for House and Senate control". Cato's Chris Edwards said, "When he gives speeches now, you hear him bashing the Democrats on overspending ... It sounds ridiculous, because we know he's a big spender." "After running up $3 trillion in
new debt – including more than half a trillion dollars for his flawed Iraq policy - it is astounding that the president is once again lecturing Congress about fiscal responsibility and fiscal priorities," stated Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (D-
Nev).
Alan Greenspan, chairman of the
Federal Reserve for 18 years, serving under six Presidents and who describes himself as "a lifelong Libertarian Republican", writes in his book
The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World that Bush and the congressional Republicans "swapped principle for power". "Little value was placed on rigorous economic policy debate or the weighing of long-term consequences". Greenspan, again promoting his book, also says "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil" and "getting
Saddam out of there was very important, but had nothing to do with
weapons of mass destruction, it had to do with oil." With regards to the costs of the war in Iraq, the nonpartisan
Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will come to between one and one and a half trillion dollars by 2010. In fact, according to the former
World Bank vice-president,
Joseph Stiglitz, when factors like medical and welfare costs of US military servicemen are added in, the cost to date is closer to $3.3 trillion. However, continues Stiglitz, "Three trillion is a very conservative number, the true costs are likely to be much larger than that ... The money being spent on the war each week would be enough to wipe out illiteracy around the world ... Just a few days' funding would be enough to provide health insurance for US children who were not covered," he said. The relaxed regulation under the Bush presidency are regarded to have been a major contributing factor to the
subprime mortgage crisis, and there are fears that the United States and the world economy could slide into another
Great Depression. A ''
Harper's Magazine'' column by Linda Bilmes, a lecturer in Public Finance at
Harvard's Kennedy School, and Joseph Stiglitz titled "The $10 trillion hangover: Paying the price for eight years of Bush", "estimate that the cost of undoing the Bush administration's economic choices, from the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan to the collapse of the financial system, soaring debt and new commitments to interest payments and
Medicare, all add up to over $10 trillion". See also National Debt Graph: Bush Sets 50-Year Record. The National debt from
George Washington to the beginning of Ronald Reagan's term totaled about one trillion dollars. The
controversial dismissal of seven US attorneys by the Bush administration's
Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2006, and their replacement by interim appointees, led critics to argue that the administration had undermined both the integrity of the Department of Justice and the non-partisan tradition of US Attorneys. and the
Department of Homeland Security alleging weak crisis management and coordination. In fact, a Canadian search-and-rescue team actually made it to a New Orleans suburb five days before US aid arrived. Others have identified political conservatism as the overriding cause of problems in the way the disaster was handled. These critics argue that the alleged unreadiness of the
United States National Guard, negligence of federal authorities, and haplessness of officials such as
Michael Brown did not represent incompetence on the part of the federal authorities, but were instead natural and deliberate consequences of the
conservative philosophy embraced by the Bush administration, especially "sink or swim" policies to
force reductions in government expenditure and
privatize key government responsibilities such as
disaster preparedness, both of which resulted in the systematic dismantling of FEMA by the
US Department of Homeland Security. Criticism led to the resignation of FEMA director
Michael Brown, and eventually, Bush himself accepted personal responsibility for what he deemed "serious problems in the federal government's response" in a September 2005 press conference. Several politicians called for either congressional or independent investigations, claiming that the Executive Branch cannot satisfactorily investigate itself.
Environment Bush has been criticized by national and international environmental groups for his administration's rollbacks of environmental protections going back more than three decades. These are in areas ranging from the
Endangered Species Act and the
Clean Air and
Clean Water Acts to
climate change. According to
MSNBC: In "Texas Chainsaw Management" (2007)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that "The verdict on George W. Bush as the nation's
environmental steward has already been written in stone. No president has mounted a more sustained and deliberate assault on the nation's environment. No president has acted with more solicitude toward
polluting industries. Assaulting the environment across a broad front, the Bush administration has promoted and implemented more than 400 measures that eviscerate 30 years of environmental policy." Kennedy has also written a book
Crimes Against Nature: How George W. Bush and His Corporate Pals Are Plundering the Country and Hijacking Our Democracy. Bush has also been criticized by the
Union of Concerned Scientists, representing over 20
Nobel Laureates, who accuse him of failing to acknowledge basic science on environmental issues. The group says that the Bush administration has engaged in intentional suppression and distortion of facts regarding the environment. In the waning days of his administration, Bush sought rule changes which would negatively impact a wide range of environmental issues.
Economic policies Moral and ethical questions have been raised over the billions of dollars Bush has requested for the Iraq war, which Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (
D-Nevada) has said ensures that less money is made available to help children and the poor in the United States. Critics have accused him of stinginess toward poor children with regards to health care in a time when it is increasingly unaffordable. Another example is Bush's effort to cut
food stamps for the poor. In 2005, Bush called for "billions of dollars in cuts that will touch people on food stamps and farmers on price supports, children under
Medicaid and adults in public housing." While passed by the Republican Congress, initially the "White House proposed the restriction".
Foreign policy and national security War on terror Bush received criticism for publicly using phrases like "bring it on" and "wanted dead or alive," both regarding terrorists. Senator
Frank Lautenberg, D-
NJ, called Bush's language "irresponsible and inciteful". "I am shaking my head in disbelief," Lautenberg said. "When I served in the Army in Europe during
World War II, I never heard any military commander – let alone the commander in chief – invite enemies to attack U.S. troops." The
Iraqi Resistance group known as the "Islamic Jihad Army" put out a video that stated "George W. Bush, you have asked us to 'bring it on.' And so help me, [we will] like you never expected. Do you have another challenge?" Bush apologized for these comments in 2006.
Iraq Bush has taken a significant amount of criticism for his decision to invade Iraq in March 2003 and his handling of the situation afterwards. As Bush organized the effort, and ordered the invasion himself, he has borne the brunt of the criticism for the undeclared war. A
Newsweek poll taken in June 2007 showed a record 73% of respondents disapproving of Bush's handling of the war in Iraq.
Enhanced interrogation techniques controversy Another point of discussion has been whether the enhanced interrogation techniques in the
Abu Ghraib prison and the
Guantánamo Bay detainment camp constitutes
torture or not. Although a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll "found that sizable majorities of Americans disagree with tactics ranging from leaving prisoners naked and chained in uncomfortable positions for hours, to trying to make a prisoner think he was being drowned. Bush has stated that "We do not
torture." Yet, many people and governments and non-governmental organizations disagree and have staged several protests. These sentiments are partly a result of the
Pentagon's suggestion that the president can decide whether normal strictures on torture still apply if it outweighs the security of the nation, and because the Bush administration has repeatedly acted against attempts to restrict controversial interrogation techniques, including
signing statements by Bush to exclude himself from the laws created by the
Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 as well as vetoing legislation that would have made
waterboarding and other
coercive interrogation methods illegal. Furthermore, some some . Currently 3 references support this but one is dead(and its title makes it appear irrelevant) and another doesn't take any stance on the act leaving only one link critical --> are concerned by the Bush administration's use of
Extraordinary rendition, where individuals are sent to other countries where torture can easily occur without any form of oversight. Bush defends this practice on the basis that: A Pentagon memo lists many interrogation techniques which were requested and approved during Bush's presidency on the basis that "The current guidelines for interrogation procedures at GTMO limit the ability of interrogators to counter advanced resistance". The Bush administration's connection to these controversial interrogation techniques had been one of the main considerations in the
movement to impeach Bush. These controversial enhanced interrogation techniques have in several cases become military policy and in response to Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse controversy Germany had looked into seeking to charge Rumsfeld and two others with war crimes.
Foreign aid Under the Bush administration, more aid has been given to Africa than under any other US president or world leader in history, with a total of $15 billion spent to fight AIDS and poverty as well as diplomatic assistance between warring peoples and other humanitarian efforts. However, this was in nominal terms. In real terms, he actually lowered the percent of GDP given as aid to foreign countries. ==
Bush derangement syndrome neologism ==