Quantum tunnelling

Quantum tunnelling falls under the domain of quantum mechanics. To understand the phenomenon, particles attempting to travel across a potential barrier can be compared to a ball trying to roll over a hill. Quantum mechanics and classical mechanics differ in their treatment of this scenario. Classical mechanics predicts that particles that do not have enough energy to classically surmount a barrier cannot reach the other side. Thus, a ball without sufficient energy to surmount the hill would roll back down. In quantum mechanics, a particle can, with a small probability, tunnel to the other side, thus crossing the barrier. The reason for this difference comes from treating matter as having properties of waves and particles. Some sources describe the mere penetration of a wave function into the barrier, without transmission on the other side, as a tunnelling effect, such as in tunnelling into the walls of a finite potential well. Tunnelling problem The wave function of a physical system of particles specifies everything that can be known about the system. Therefore, problems in quantum mechanics analyse the system's wave function. Using mathematical formulations, such as the Schrödinger equation, the time evolution of a known wave function can be deduced. The square of the absolute value of this wave function is directly related to the probability distribution of the particle positions, which describes the probability that the particles would be measured at those positions. As shown in the animation, when a wave packet impinges on the barrier, most of it is reflected and some is transmitted through the barrier. The wave packet becomes more delocalised: it is now on both sides of the barrier and lower in maximum amplitude, but equal in integrated square-magnitude, meaning that the probability the particle is somewhere remains unity. The wider the barrier and the higher the barrier energy, the lower the probability of tunnelling. Some models of a tunnelling barrier, such as the rectangular barriers shown, can be analysed and solved algebraically. Most problems do not have an algebraic solution, so numerical solutions are used. "Semiclassical methods" offer approximate solutions that are easier to compute, such as the WKB approximation. == History ==

The Schrödinger equation was published in 1926. The first person to apply the Schrödinger equation to a problem that involved tunnelling between two classically allowed regions through a potential barrier was Friedrich Hund in a series of articles published in 1927. He studied the solutions of a double-well potential and discussed molecular spectra. Leonid Mandelstam and Mikhail Leontovich discovered tunnelling independently and published their results in 1928. In 1927, Lothar Nordheim, assisted by Ralph Fowler, published a paper that discussed thermionic emission and reflection of electrons from metals. He assumed a surface potential barrier that confines the electrons within the metal and showed that the electrons have a finite probability of tunnelling through or reflecting from the surface barrier when their energies are close to the barrier energy. Classically, the electron would either transmit or reflect with 100% certainty, depending on its energy. In 1928 J. Robert Oppenheimer published two papers on field emission, i.e. the emission of electrons induced by strong electric fields. Nordheim and Fowler simplified Oppenheimer's derivation and found values for the emitted currents and work functions that agreed with experiments. The latter researchers simultaneously solved the Schrödinger equation for a model nuclear potential and derived a relationship between the half-life of the particle and the energy of emission that depended directly on the mathematical probability of tunnelling. All three researchers were familiar with the works on field emission, In the early days of quantum theory, the term tunnel effect was not used, and the effect was instead referred to as penetration of, or leaking through, a barrier. The German term wellenmechanischer Tunneleffekt was used in 1931 by Walter Schottky. In 1960, following Esaki's work, Ivar Giaever showed experimentally that tunnelling also took place in superconductors. The tunnelling spectrum gave direct evidence of the superconducting energy gap. In 1962, Brian Josephson predicted the tunnelling of superconducting Cooper pairs. Esaki, Giaever and Josephson shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics for their works on quantum tunnelling in solids. In 2025, John Clarke, John M. Martinis and Michel H. Devoret received the Nobel Prize in physics for experiments done in 1984 and 1985 that demonstrated how quantum tunnelling can be observed on a macroscopic scale, involving many particles. They built an electrical circuit with two superconductors, components that can conduct a current without any electrical resistance. They separated these with a thin layer of material that did not conduct any current at all. In this experiment, they showed that they could control and investigate a phenomenon in which all the charged particles in the superconductor behave in unison, as if they are a single particle that fills the entire circuit. == Applications ==

Tunnelling is used to explain some important macroscopic physical phenomena. Solid-state physics Electronics Tunnelling is a source of current leakage in very-large-scale integration (VLSI) electronics and results in a substantial power drain and heating effects that plague such devices. It is considered the lower limit on how microelectronic device elements can be made. Tunnelling is a fundamental technique used to program the floating gates of flash memory. Cold emission Cold emission of electrons is relevant to semiconductors and superconductor physics. It is similar to thermionic emission, where electrons randomly jump from the surface of a metal to follow a voltage bias because they statistically end up with more energy than the barrier, through random collisions with other particles. When the electric field is very large, the barrier becomes thin enough for electrons to tunnel out of the atomic state, leading to a current that varies approximately exponentially with the electric field. These materials are important for flash memory, vacuum tubes, and some electron microscopes. Tunnel junction A simple barrier can be created by separating two conductors with a very thin insulator. Tunnelling is readily detectable with potential barriers in thin-film junctions of thickness about 3 nm or smaller for electrons. Josephson junctions take advantage of quantum tunnelling and superconductivity to create the Josephson effect. This has applications in precision measurements of voltages and magnetic fields, Because the tunnelling current drops off rapidly, tunnel diodes can be created that have a range of voltages for which current decreases as voltage increases. This peculiar property is used in some applications, such as high speed devices where the characteristic tunnelling probability changes as rapidly as the bias voltage. Tunnel field-effect transistors A European research project demonstrated field effect transistors in which the gate (channel) is controlled via quantum tunnelling rather than by thermal injection, reducing gate voltage from ≈1 volt to 0.2 volts and reducing power consumption by up to 100×. If these transistors can be scaled up into VLSI chips, they would improve the performance per power of integrated circuits. Conductivity of crystalline solids While the Drude-Lorentz model of electrical conductivity makes excellent predictions about the nature of electrons conducting in metals, it can be furthered by using quantum tunnelling to explain the nature of the electron's collisions. Radioactive decay Radioactive decay is the process of emission of particles and energy from the unstable nucleus of an atom to form a stable product. This is done via the tunnelling of a particle out of the nucleus (an electron tunnelling into the nucleus is electron capture). This was the first application of quantum tunnelling. Radioactive decay is a relevant issue for astrobiology as this consequence of quantum tunnelling creates a constant energy source over a large time interval for environments outside the circumstellar habitable zone where insolation would not be possible (subsurface oceans) or effective. Chemistry Energetically forbidden reactions Chemical reactions in the interstellar medium occur at extremely low energies. Probably the most fundamental ion-molecule reaction involves hydrogen ions with hydrogen molecules. The quantum mechanical tunnelling rate for the same reaction using the hydrogen isotope deuterium, D- + H2 -> H- + HD, has been measured experimentally in an ion trap. The deuterium was placed in an ion trap and cooled. The trap was then filled with hydrogen. At the temperatures used in the experiment, the energy barrier for reaction would not allow the reaction to succeed with classical dynamics alone. Quantum tunnelling allowed reactions to happen in rare collisions. It was calculated from the experimental data that collisions happened one in every hundred billion. Astrochemistry in interstellar clouds By including quantum tunnelling, the astrochemical syntheses of various molecules in interstellar clouds can be explained, such as the synthesis of molecular hydrogen, water (ice) and the prebiotic important formaldehyde. Here it is important both as electron tunnelling and proton tunnelling. Electron tunnelling is a key factor in many biochemical redox reactions (photosynthesis, cellular respiration) as well as enzymatic catalysis. Proton tunnelling is a key factor in spontaneous DNA mutation. A hydrogen bond joins DNA base pairs. A double well potential along a hydrogen bond separates a potential energy barrier. It is believed that the double well potential is asymmetric, with one well deeper than the other such that the proton normally rests in the deeper well. For a mutation to occur, the proton must have tunnelled into the shallower well. The proton's movement from its regular position is called a tautomeric transition. If DNA replication takes place in this state, the base pairing rule for DNA may be jeopardised, causing a mutation. Per-Olov Lowdin was the first to develop this theory of spontaneous mutation within the double helix. Other instances of quantum tunnelling-induced mutations in biology are believed to be a cause of ageing and cancer. == Astrophysics ==

Quantum tunnelling is expected to occur at the event horizon of black holes, leading to Hawking radiation. Classically nothing can escape from a black hole, but quantum tunnelling gives a small probability for emission of radiation. == Mathematical discussion ==

Schrödinger equation The time-independent Schrödinger equation for one particle in one dimension can be written as -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \Psi(x) + V(x) \Psi(x) = E \Psi(x) or \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \Psi(x) = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( V(x) - E \right) \Psi(x) \equiv \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} M(x) \Psi(x) , where • \hbar is the reduced Planck constant, • m is the particle mass, • x represents distance measured in the direction of motion of the particle, • \Psi is the Schrödinger wave function, • V is the potential energy of the particle (measured relative to any convenient reference level), • E is the energy of the particle that is associated with motion in the x-axis (measured relative to V), • M(x) is a quantity defined by V(x)-E, which has no accepted name in physics. The solutions of the Schrödinger equation take different forms for different values of x, depending on whether M(x) is positive or negative. When M(x) is constant and negative, then the Schrödinger equation can be written in the form \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \Psi(x) = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} M(x) \Psi(x) = -k^2 \Psi(x), \qquad \text{where} \quad k^2=- \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} M. The solutions of this equation represent travelling waves, with phase-constant +k or -k. Alternatively, if M(x) is constant and positive, then the Schrödinger equation can be written in the form \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \Psi(x) = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} M(x) \Psi(x) = {\kappa}^2 \Psi(x), \qquad \text{where} \quad {\kappa}^2= \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} M. The solutions of this equation are rising and falling exponentials in the form of evanescent waves. When M(x) varies with position, the same difference in behaviour occurs, depending on whether M(x) is negative or positive. It follows that the sign of M(x) determines the nature of the medium, with negative M(x) corresponding to medium A and positive M(x) corresponding to medium B. It thus follows that evanescent wave coupling can occur if a region of positive M(x) is sandwiched between two regions of negative M(x), hence creating a potential barrier. The mathematics of dealing with the situation where M(x) varies with x is difficult, except in special cases that usually do not correspond to physical reality. A full mathematical treatment appears in the 1965 monograph by Fröman and Fröman. Their ideas have not been incorporated into physics textbooks, but their corrections have little quantitative effect. WKB approximation The wave function is expressed as the exponential of a function: \Psi(x) = e^{\Phi(x)}, where \Phi''(x) + \Phi'(x)^2 = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( V(x) - E \right). \Phi'(x) is then separated into real and imaginary parts: \Phi'(x) = A(x) + i B(x), where A(x) and B(x) are real-valued functions. Substituting the second equation into the first and using the fact that the imaginary part needs to be 0 results in: A'(x) + A(x)^2 - B(x)^2 = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( V(x) - E \right). of quantum mechanics. Wigner function for tunnelling through the potential barrier U(x) = 8e^{-0.25 x^2} in atomic units (a.u.). The solid lines represent the level set of the Hamiltonian H(x,p) = p^2 / 2 + U(x) . To solve this equation using the semiclassical approximation, each function must be expanded as a power series in \hbar. From the equations, the power series must start with at least an order of \hbar^{-1} to satisfy the real part of the equation; for a good classical limit starting with the highest power of the Planck constant possible is preferable, which leads to A(x) = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \hbar^k A_k(x) and B(x) = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \hbar^k B_k(x), with the following constraints on the lowest order terms, A_0(x)^2 - B_0(x)^2 = 2m \left( V(x) - E \right) and A_0(x) B_0(x) = 0. At this point two extreme cases can be considered. Case 1 If the amplitude varies slowly as compared to the phase A_0(x) = 0 and B_0(x) = \pm \sqrt{ 2m \left( E - V(x) \right) } which corresponds to classical motion. Resolving the next order of expansion yields \Psi(x) \approx C \frac{ e^{i \int dx \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( E - V(x) \right)} + \theta} }{\sqrt[4]{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( E - V(x) \right)}} Case 2 If the phase varies slowly as compared to the amplitude, B_0(x) = 0 and A_0(x) = \pm \sqrt{ 2m \left( V(x) - E \right) } which corresponds to tunnelling. Resolving the next order of the expansion yields \Psi(x) \approx \frac{ C_{+} e^{+\int dx \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( V(x) - E \right)}} + C_{-} e^{-\int dx \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( V(x) - E \right)}}}{\sqrt[4]{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left( V(x) - E \right)}} In both cases it is apparent from the denominator that both these approximate solutions are bad near the classical turning points E = V(x). Away from the potential hill, the particle acts similar to a free and oscillating wave; beneath the potential hill, the particle undergoes exponential changes in amplitude. By considering the behaviour at these limits and classical turning points a global solution can be made. To start, a classical turning point, x_1 is chosen and \frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\left(V(x)-E\right) is expanded in a power series about x_1: \frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\left(V(x)-E\right) = v_1 (x - x_1) + v_2 (x - x_1)^2 + \cdots Keeping only the first order term ensures linearity: \frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\left(V(x)-E\right) = v_1 (x - x_1). Using this approximation, the equation near x_1 becomes a differential equation: \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \Psi(x) = v_1 (x - x_1) \Psi(x). This can be solved using Airy functions as solutions. \Psi(x) = C_A Ai\left( \sqrt[3]{v_1} (x - x_1) \right) + C_B Bi\left( \sqrt[3]{v_1} (x - x_1) \right) Taking these solutions for all classical turning points, a global solution can be formed that links the limiting solutions. Given the two coefficients on one side of a classical turning point, the two coefficients on the other side of a classical turning point can be determined by using this local solution to connect them. Hence, the Airy function solutions will asymptote into sine, cosine and exponential functions in the proper limits. The relationships between C,\theta and C_{+},C_{-} are C_{+} = \frac{1}{2} C \cos{\left(\theta - \frac{\pi}{4}\right)} and : C_{-} = - C \sin{\left(\theta - \frac{\pi}{4}\right)} With the coefficients found, the global solution can be found. Therefore, the transmission coefficient for a particle tunnelling through a single potential barrier is T(E) = e^{-2\int_{x_1}^{x_2} dx \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} \left[ V(x) - E \right]}}, where x_1,x_2 are the two classical turning points for the potential barrier. For a rectangular barrier, this expression simplifies to: T(E) = e^{-2\sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(V_0-E)}(x_2-x_1)}. == Faster than light ==

In 1998, Francis E. Low reviewed briefly the phenomenon of zero-time tunnelling. More recently, experimental tunnelling time data of phonons, photons, and electrons was published by Günter Nimtz. Another experiment overseen by A. M. Steinberg, seems to indicate that particles could tunnel at apparent speeds faster than light. Other physicists, such as Herbert Winful, disputed these claims. Winful argued that the wave packet of a tunnelling particle propagates locally, so a particle can't tunnel through the barrier non-locally. Winful also argued that the experiments that are purported to show non-local propagation have been misinterpreted. In particular, the group velocity of a wave packet does not measure its speed, but is related to the amount of time the wave packet is stored in the barrier. Moreover, if quantum tunnelling is modelled with the relativistic Dirac equation, well established mathematical theorems imply that the process is completely subluminal. It has also been proved that within a relativistic quantum field theory framework, tunnelling cannot be superluminal, even though the group velocity can be larger than the light velocity. == Dynamical tunnelling ==

The concept of quantum tunnelling can be extended to situations where there exists a quantum transport between regions that are classically not connected even if there is no associated potential barrier. This phenomenon is known as dynamical tunnelling. Tunnelling in phase space The concept of dynamical tunnelling is particularly suited to address the problem of quantum tunnelling in high dimensions (d>1). In the case of an integrable system, where bounded classical trajectories are confined onto tori in phase space, tunnelling can be understood as the quantum transport between semi-classical states built on two distinct but symmetric tori. Chaos-assisted tunnelling In real life, most systems are not integrable and display various degrees of chaos. Classical dynamics is then said to be mixed and the system phase space is typically composed of islands of regular orbits surrounded by a large sea of chaotic orbits. The existence of the chaotic sea, where transport is classically allowed, between the two symmetric tori then assists the quantum tunnelling between them. This phenomenon is referred as chaos-assisted tunnelling. and is characterised by sharp resonances of the tunnelling rate when varying any system parameter. Resonance-assisted tunnelling When \hbar is small in front of the size of the regular islands, the fine structure of the classical phase space plays a key role in tunnelling. In particular the two symmetric tori are coupled "via a succession of classically forbidden transitions across nonlinear resonances" surrounding the two islands. == Related phenomena ==

Several phenomena have the same behaviour as quantum tunnelling. Two examples are evanescent wave coupling (the application of Maxwell's wave-equation to light) and the application of the non-dispersive wave-equation from acoustics applied to "waves on strings". These effects are modelled similarly to the rectangular potential barrier. In these cases, one transmission medium through which the wave propagates that is the same or nearly the same throughout, and a second medium through which the wave travels differently. This can be described as a thin region of medium B between two regions of medium A. The analysis of a rectangular barrier by means of the Schrödinger equation can be adapted to these other effects provided that the wave equation has travelling wave solutions in medium A but real exponential solutions in medium B. In optics, medium A is a vacuum while medium B is glass. In acoustics, medium A may be a liquid or gas and medium B a solid. For both cases, medium A is a region of space where the particle's total energy is greater than its potential energy and medium B is the potential barrier. These have an incoming wave and resultant waves in both directions. There can be more mediums and barriers, and the barriers need not be discrete. Approximations are useful in this case. A classical wave-particle association was originally analysed as analogous to quantum tunnelling, but subsequent analysis found a fluid dynamics cause related to the vertical momentum imparted to particles near the barrier. == See also ==