MarketSchism of the Russian Church
Company Profile

Schism of the Russian Church

The Schism of the Russian Church, also known as raskol, was an era of religious and social turmoil in Russia spanning from the late 1660s to the early 1690s, during which dissenters opposing the authority of the Russian Orthodox Church appeared in great numbers, and were persecuted and suppressed by the ecclesiastical hierarchy and secular government.

Muscovy's Splendid Isolation (1441–1589)
Since the 15th century, the Russian Orthodox Church had a cardinal role in defining the coalescing Muscovite collective identity, newly emerging after the overthrow of the Tatar Yoke. In 1439, spurned by the Byzantine Emperor who desperately required European assistance against the Turks, all but one of the Greek Orthodox bishops present at the Council of Florence acceded to a reunion with the Roman Pontiff. Though the union was later repudiated by the people of Constantinople and many of the priesthood, the news of it shocked the Russians, who regarded the act as a corruption of the Byzantine Mother Church and a capitulation to the heretical and despised Catholics. In 1441, Prince Vasily II imprisoned Metropolitan Isidore, who supported the union, and in 1448 the Russian bishops elected Jonah in his stead, making the Muscovite Church de facto autocephalous and producing a schism with the Greeks. In 1453, Constantinople fell to the Turks, and the disaster was perceived in Russia as a divine punishment vindicating its stance. The Greek-speaking Orthodox were now under Muslim or Catholic rule, and Muscovy remained the only independent Orthodox power. A sense of superiority and election permeated Russia following the downfall of the Second Rome. Before, the nation generally followed the Greek-speaking church, from which it received the faith in the 9th century: In the 14th century, after Byzantium adopted the Sabbaite typicon in place of the Studite, the Russians followed suit within a century. But after 1453, the Greeks were no longer considered as reliable teachers, but as contaminated by foreign influence, reviled in the xenophobic and deeply religious Muscovy, priding itself on its strict isolation from the outside world. Russian Christianity was now espoused as the only true remaining form of Orthodoxy, untainted and uncorrupted. Learned churchmen ascribed to their nation the titles of "New Rome", "New Israel", and "New Jerusalem". Elder Philotheus of Pskov was most prominent in formulating this position, stating in 1523 that Moscow was the third and last Rome before the End Times, the guardian of authentic Christianity destined to rule the earth. Philotheus recorded The Legend of the White Cowl, a supposed account of such an item which belonged to the last Orthodox Pope in Rome, was then transferred to the Patriarch of Constantinopole, and finally arrived in Novgorod, symbolizing the transfer of true faith between the three Romes. The Metropolitans of Novgorod wore white cowls, presumably in remembrance of that. The principality inherited from the Byzantines a most negative view of the Latin West, and of foreigners altogether: Catholics, Muslims, Jews and animists were all regarded as barely differentiated pogany, "pagans", an adjective still synonymous with "loathsome" in modern Russian. Apart from the main religious differences between Western and Eastern Christianity, virtually all "Latin" customs, like shaving or eating bloodied meat, were considered revolting. Science, especially astronomy, was regarded as sorcery, and secular art as defiling: portraits or landscape drawings were unknown, and visual art was confined mostly to icon painting. Apart from administrative tracts, the entire literature was religious; when printing was introduced in the mid-16th century, it was monopolized by the state, and used as an instrument of control rather than for spreading new ideas. Noblewomen lived in secluded quarters and under a strict regimen of separation from men. The country's geographical remoteness, intellectual backwardness and harsh rulership allowed it to maintain a separation from Europe that the mercantile and intellectual centre Constantinople could never exercise. Few Muscovites travelled abroad, and foreigners required special permission to enter and were closely monitored to discourage any contact with the native population that was not strictly necessary. Apart from military professionals, that the warlike state could not afford to do without, such permits were granted sparingly. As scripture and the service books were originally translated from Greek, and Muscovy was intellectually backward and lacking in scholarship, Russian religious parochialism was plagued by self-contradiction and self-doubt from the start. Most of the patristic literature remained untranslated, beyond the reach of Muscovite churchmen. Greek scholars were required to gain access to the tradition of which Russia claimed to be the sole possessor. In 1518 the learned monk Maximus the Greek was summoned to Moscow to aid in the translation of several sacred works from his language to Slavonic, and to correct the liturgical manuscripts – not for the last time, the ecclesiastical hierarchy became aware that poor scribal transmission and lack of systematic conventions resulted in inconsistencies between the extant texts, and even to what it deemed as heresies that entered them. Maximus attempted to introduce uniform rules on transcription and grammar. In 1525, he was tried for heresy, accused among other crimes of corrupting the prayer books. Apart from getting involved in internal church conflicts, Maximus' downfall was also precipitated because Russian clerics could not accept a foreigner tampering with their sacred traditions. The invitation of foreign scholars ceased for over a century after the Maximus affair, leaving the Russian church even more isolated. Eventually, his work was widely accepted, and even the most conservative elements in the Muscovite church came to regard him as a revered authority. In 1551, keen to eliminate all abuses and irregularities from the nation's religious life, Russian church hierarchs convened under Ivan the Terrible in the Stoglav ("hundred chapters") Synod. Apart from numerous administrative decisions and a repeated injunction to correct the faulty service books "based on ancient manuscripts", they also discussed ritual and liturgy. Guided by a strong conviction that even the slightest minutiae were ultimately derived from ancient tradition, and therefore no diversity could be allowed, they determined that an Orthodox Christian must cross oneself with "two fingers" (folding together the thumb, ring and little fingers, while holding the index and middle fingers upright), that the Alleluia in the liturgy should be recited twice, and that only baptism by triple immersion was acceptable. They rejected contrary customs that appeared in the land – crossing with "three fingers" (folding the thumb, index and middle fingers together) and tripling the Alleluia – as foreign and unorthodox. The actual, historical development of church rites and customs is difficult to reconstruct. Professor Nikolay Kapterev concluded that the "two-fingered" sign of the cross appeared among the Greeks no later than the 9th century, and became a highly symbolic gesture in the Orthodox struggle against the "Monophysites", stressing Christ's dual nature. Contemporary Greek service books contain anathemas against those who cross themselves differently. As Christianity was brought to the Eastern Slavs at the time, the two-fingered sign of the cross was revered in Russia. In the 13th century, the "three-fingered" sign emerged in Byzantium and gained popularity, eventually eclipsing any other variant. It slowly spread to other lands; Orthodox tracts from the 1590s written in Poland-Lithuania still mandate the two-fingered sign, but soon after, the three-fingered became dominant in that region. Although the Stoglav deemed the first as the authentic Russian practice and the second as foreign, the older sign was still common in Serbia and Lithuania in the 17th century, while the three-fingered sign was quite popular in northeastern Russia. Such complex circumstances also mark the emergence and development of other ritual specifics. In 1589, while on a journey to Russia to collect alms, Ecumenical Patriarch Jeremias II was forcibly detained by Regent Boris Godunov until he acquisced to grant the Russian church an autocephalous status and promote the Metropolitan of Moscow to the rank of patriarch. The schism with the Greeks ended, with both sides recognizing the orthodoxy of each other, and Russia was formally reintegrated into the ecumenical church, in implicit acceptance of its independence and standing. The charter which granted autocephaly and established the patriarchate, and implored the Russians to full religious unity with the other Orthodox, the chrysobull, became a foundational document of the Muscovite church. ==Pressures for reform (1612-1651)==
Pressures for reform (1612-1651)
In 1598, the last Tsar of the House of Rurik died without an heir, inaugurating a prolonged period of strife and political instability known as the Time of Troubles. Civil war raged as several usurpers and impostors claimed the throne, a massive famine led to the death of as many as a third of the entire population, and both Sweden and Poland invaded Russia, the latter occupying Moscow. The anarchy only subsided in 1613, with the election of a new Tsar, Michael I of House Romanov. The horrors of the Time of Troubles deeply shook the Russians' confidence in being God's elect as keepers of the true faith. Despair, soul-searching and grim disavowal of worldly life are common themes in the religious thought of the era. The participation of numerous Ruthenian Orthodox troops on the Polish invaders' side heightened local xenophobia and distrust of all foreigners. In 1620, a synod ordered the rebaptism of Orthodox Christians from other lands who wished to join the Russian church. Michael was a weak ruler, and the actual governor was his father, Patriarch Filaret, Feodor Romanov by his secular name, who was forcibly tonsured (and therefore could not serve as Tsar himself) by Boris Godunov. Filaret returned from Polish captivity and was appointed head of the church by his son in 1619. Granted the title "Great Sovereign", used only by the Tsar, the patriarch wielded immense power, de facto serving as regent. He consolidated the position of the church hierarchy within Russia's loose religious landscape, appointing his supporters as abbots in great monasteries that enjoyed considerable autonomy and were only nominally subject to the bishops. ==Earlier reforms==
Earlier reforms
This heightened religiosity was materialized in the Zealots of Piety, a renewal movement aimed at reforming liturgy and embracing piety. The movement's early members included the Archbishop of Novgorod Nikon and Archpriests , , and Avvakum, with secular support from Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich and his supporters Fyodor Rtishchev and Boris Morozov. In the 1630s and 1640s, during the reign of Patriarch of Moscow Joseph, the Zealots of Piety were concerned primarily with reforming a disordered liturgy and suppressing impious pre-Christian festivals, issues which had been prominent since the Stoglav Sobor of 1551. In 1636, Nerov and other priests sent a petition to the Patriarch from Nizhny Novgorod requesting aid in reforming "liturgical shortcuts". Complaints included the use of ( ), the practice of chanting multiple parts of the services at the same time, singing evening vespers in the morning, and omitting parts of the service altogether. The Patriarch responded by ordering parish clergy to prohibit such behavior. The petition further cited the observance among villagers of pre-Christian festivals such as Koliada, to which Tsar Alexei responded by decreeing a ban on the pagan entertainment. Joseph's reign as Patriarch of Moscow was marked by a decline of the political power of the position. During the reign of the previous Patriarch, Filaret of Moscow, from 1619 to 1633, the Patriarch served as de jure ruler of the church and had a powerful influence on the state. In contrast, Joseph was unable to intercede in public affairs, and the state began to interfere in ecclesiastical affairs. In 1652, Joseph died. Many members of the Zealots of Piety urged Tsar Alexei to appoint Stephen Vonifatiev to the position, as he was the movement's informal leader, but the Tsar instead appointed Nikon to the seat, as Nikon had been the Tsar's spiritual advisor and close companion since 1646. Nikon was a Volga Finn born to a peasant family, and his harsh upbringing meant he took an uncompromising stance as Patriarch and reformer. ==Nikon's reforms==
Nikon's reforms
. In 1653, with support from the Tsar, Patriarch Nikon began the process of changing the Russian divine service books to align with their contemporary Greek counterparts and changed certain liturgical rituals. Nikon's reforms of the service books were performed on the advice of Ukrainian and Greek monks and advisors. The former were a more learned and reactionary group than native Muscovite priests, having adapted Catholic Counter-Reformation rhetoric to the defence of the Orthodox Church, while the latter had an obvious bias in favour of the Greek rite. Among liturgical rituals, the most controversial changes included replacing the two-finger sign of the cross with one with three fingers and pronouncing "hallelujah" three times instead of two. These new reforms met with resistance from both the clergy and the people, who disputed the legitimacy and correctness of these reforms. Avvakum and other clergymen called Nikon a heretic, and the boyars saw Nikon's reforms and the renewal of the Patriarch's political power as a challenge to their own influence on the state. The major claim made by Nikon's opposition was that the Russian pre-reform faith more closely adhered to the practices of the early church, since the fall of Constantinople had corrupted the Greek rite while Russians had preserved the church. This idea of the Moscow patriarchy as uncorrupted meant that observance of the Greek practices was apostasy. This tension between reformation and preservation of texts had been an issue in the Russian Church long before Nikon, as the Zealots of Piety and other reformers understood that consistent texts were necessary for consistent worship. However, while the conservative Zealots viewed the original Muscovite texts as inviolable and sacred, and viewed the reformation as a process of consolidating a preserved faith, Nikon was convinced by his advisors that the Russian practices were in error compared to the unalloyed Greek rite. Nikon was following the guidance of the 1593 Council of Constantinople, which required the adherence of the newly created Moscow Patriarchate to the Greek rite, while opponents of the reforms protested that the "correct" Greek books had been printed in Venetian, Catholic print houses for the Greek church of the Islamic Ottoman Empire. Since Nikon's reforms held that not only the service books but the liturgical practices of the pre-reform rite were heretical, he implied that pre-reform saints were also in error, a point often brought up by opponents of the reforms. A traditional view of Nikon's reforms is that they only affected the external ritualistic side of the Russian Orthodox faith and that the Schism concerned only fanatics who superstitiously clung to pre-reform Russian customs. However, these reforms alienated the largely illiterate peasantry, for whom rituals such as the sign of the cross were inseparable from orthodox doctrine. Furthermore, the reforms established radically different relations between the church and the faithful. Nikon used his reforms for the purpose of centralization of the church and strengthening of his own authority; for example, Nikon would seize land and use the Russian Church's wealth to found his own monastic ventures, such as the New Jerusalem Monastery. The earlier reforms of the Zealots of Piety were aimed at consolidating the power of priests in their own parish in order to combat local disorder, but the Nikonian reforms were aimed at consolidating the Patriarch's control over the parishes. These offences alienated the Tsar, first leading to Nikon's flight from Moscow to one of his monasteries and later to Nikon's deposition at the Great Moscow Synod of 1666, a council convened by the Tsar himself. The official reason for the gathering was to try Nikon for dereliction of duty during his absence from Moscow, but as part of its proceedings, the council also declared the Stoglav Sobor of 1551 heretical, as it had dogmatized pre-reform Russian practices such as the two-finger sign of the cross, which was unacceptable under the Greek rite. The council was the consummation of the Nikonian reformation crisis and marked the beginning of the Old Believer movement, as it was at this synod that Avvakum and other Old Believer priests were finally anathematized and exiled. ==Uprisings and persecution==
Uprisings and persecution
, a patroness of the Moscow proto-Old Believers, being taken to prison, defiantly raising her hand in the two-fingered sign of the cross; a painting by Vasily Surikov, 1887. The case brought by the defenders of the old practices found many supporters among different strata of the Russian society. Some of the low-ranking clergy protested against the increase of feudal oppression coming from the church leaders in the form of monastic serfdom, while some members of the high-ranking clergy joined the Raskol movement due to their discontent over Nikon's authoritative aspirations and the arbitrariness of his church reforms. The unification of such heterogeneous forces against what had become the "official" church could be explained by the somewhat contradictory ideology of the Raskol movement. A certain idealization and conservation of traditional values and old traditions, a critical attitude towards innovations, the conservation of national originality, and the acceptance of martyrdom in the name of the old faith were intertwined with criticism of the traditional practices of feudalism and serfdom. Different social strata were attracted to different sides of this ideology. In the upper strata of ecclesiastic elites, Nikon's former friends among the Zealots of Piety were his most outspoken critics. Ivan Neronov spoke against the strengthening of patriarch's authority and demanded democratization of ecclesiastic management, while Avvakum directly protested the reformed rituals. However, both had already come into conflict with the Church before their participation in the Raskol: Neronov was engaged in a dispute over the collection of taxes, and Avvakum quarrelled over assuming Neronov's position as Archpriest after Neronov's exile from Moscow. The first martyr for the pre-reform belief was Bishop Paul of Kolomna, who was burned in Novgorod in 1656 for defending the pre-reform texts. According to Old Believer tradition, Avvakum and his companions were burned in 1682. Secular aristocrats also participated in the Raskol movement, such as Boyarynya Feodosia Morozova and her sister Princess Evdokia Urusova, who openly supported the defenders of the old faith and were also martyred. Avvakum had been Morozova's confessor, and she followed Avvakum in rejecting the Nikonian reforms. After convincing her sister to join the Raskol, the two were arrested by the Tsar in 1671 and were starved to death in 1675. In the lower strata of the popular, peasant defence of the old traditions, opposition often materialized as popular uprisings. Some of the supporters of the Old Believers took part in Stepan Razin's rebellion in 16701671. After Razin's beheading, many of his supporters joined other Raskol popular movements, such as the Solovetsky Monastery uprising and the Moscow uprising of 1682. At the Solovetsky Monastery, both monks and enserfed peasants rebelled against Tsarist authority, opposing what they saw as the exploitation of secular power: for the monks, this was the consolidation of central authority during the church schism, and for the peasants, this was the feudal system which supported the centralizing Nikonian reforms. Both groups were united in their defence of the Old Belief. In the Moscow uprising of 1682, Old Believers openly preached to the Moscow Streltsy regiments who were in rebellion due to discontent with their superiors, and one of the leaders of the rebels, Prince Ivan Andreevich Khovansky, openly supported the pre-reform traditions. While occupying the capital, part of the rebel unit's conditions were that the official church must agree to a public disputation with the Old Believer priest Nikita Pustosvyat; his well-known debate with Patriarch Joachim of Moscow led to his beheading and to the Moscow uprising's alternative title as the "Raskolnik rebellion". ==Old Believers movement==
Old Believers movement
, peasants are shown with newly revised service books after the reforms. In the wake of the persecutions of the 1600s, it was clear to many schismatics that reunion with the Russian Orthodox Church would be impossible. As a result of their conflict with the official church hierarchy, the Old Believers (or: Old Ritualists) never formed a united movement. Instead, it was largely a movement of independent factions on the edges of the Russian empire, far from persecution and state authority. Old Believers fled to the dense forests of Northern Russia and Volga region, the southern borders of Russia, Siberia, and even abroad, where they would organize their own obshchinas. Many of the members of the old faith migrated west, seeking refuge bordering the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, where the Warsaw Compact allowed them to practice their faith freely. In 1684, Princess Sophia, with active support from the Russian Orthodox Church, began to persecute the so-called ( 'schismatics'). Up to this point, Old Believers had merely been anathematized, but following Sophia's ukaz, local governments were commanded to burn all schismatics at the stake unless they submitted to the Nikonian reforms. The majority of Old Believers were peasants or cossacks, but this persecution inadvertently attracted members of the merchant class to the schismatics. Merchants were expected to collect taxes for the state, but since schismatics were persecuted by the government, schismatic merchants were exempt from this duty. The memory of their schism with the official Russian Orthodox Church is fundamental to the Old Believers movement. Much of their literary canon consists of letters written by priests such as Avvakum, , and during Nikon's reforms, as well as literature depicting Nikon as a devil or Antichrist. Particularly important to the canon is Avvakum's The Life Written By Himself, an account of his various exiles by authorities to Siberia. Since the Old Believers were denied the use of the printing press to print their literature and unrevised service books, they developed a robust tradition of manuscript writing and book collecting. ==Apocalypticism==
Apocalypticism
, the dragon and the beast are seated beside the two-horned Antichrist. Many Old Believers associated Nikon's reforms and the increasingly absolutist state as the arrival of the Antichrist, heralding Armageddon. The most radical defenders of the Old Belief preached a message of apocalypticism and the coming of the Antichrist in connection with Nikon's reforms. Following the Time of Troubles, loss of ecclesiastic power and the legal enserfment of peasants in the Sobornoye Ulozheniye (not to mention a plague in Moscow), there was a general atmosphere of the end-times in Russia in the middle of the 1600s. The more famous early schismatics, such as Avvakum and his brothers-in-exile at the Pustozyorsk prison, often justified this time of strife as God's punishment of the ecclesiastic and tsarist authorities for their erroneous reforms. Nikon, being the figurehead of the reforms, was often framed in Old Believer tales either as an accomplice to the Antichrist or even the Antichrist himself. Other state authorities, especially those who persecuted the Old Believers, such as Tsar Alexei, would also be decried by schismatics as agents of the Devil. The reforms of Nikon were seen by some Old Believers as direct manifestations of the Antichrist, with the altered sign of the cross compared to the mark of the beast, and the year of the 1666 Moscow Synod seen as indicating the number of the beast. By condemning its own saints and historical rituals, Old Believers further believed that Nikon's reforms plunged the Third Rome, Russia, into heresy, which was a clear indication of the end-times. These ideas of the Antichrist's arrival on Earth and of the end-times found a broad response among the Russian people, who sympathized with the ideology of these more radical apologetes. The most dramatic practices of the Raskol included the practice of (, or baptism by fire), practiced by those who thought that the end of the world was near. Rather than submit to apostasy or to the Antichrist, Old Believers would burn themselves alive. These practices were inspired by the martyrs of the early Christian church, as well as the practices of earlier fringe ascetic movements, such as the self-immolating followers of Kapiton in the middle of the 1600s. This practice of active, fiery martyrdom gradually died out as the schism cooled down at the beginning of the 1700s. During the reign of Peter the Great, Old Believers who were not active political dissidents were no longer persecuted, so Old Believers no longer needed to martyr themselves rather than submit to the rule of what they perceived as agents of the Antichrist. Kapiton's self-immolating followers, the ( ), appeared in Russia at the same time as the Zealots of Piety and were equally inspired by the sense of Armageddon following the Time of Troubles; however, while the Zealots practiced optimistic conservation of ecclesiastic rites, the lesnye startsy believed in a kind of pessimistic triumph of the Antichrist over the world, where ecclesiastic rites were no longer meaningful. The Old Believers who preserve the conservative ideals of the Zealots of Piety are known as the Popovtsy, meaning "priested ones", as they accept clergymen ordained by the Nikonite Russian Orthodox Church but reject the church's authority; those who preserve the apocalyptic pessimism of Kapiton and other spiritual leaders are the Bezpopovtsy, the "priestless ones", as they reject both the established church's priesthood and authority. Many Bezpopovtsy sects reject any sacraments which are traditionally performed by priests, such as marriage, and therefore practice celibacy. ==References==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com