Birth and youth . 15 October 1859. François Claudius Ravachol was born 14 October 1859 in
Saint-Chamond, Loire. He was the eldest child of the four children of a Dutch father (Jean Adam Koenigstein) and a French mother (Marie Ravachol). His father beat his mother and eventually abandoned the family, leaving Marie Ravachol and their children alone. For her part, she worked, whenever she had the opportunity, as a laborer in a
raw silk industry. His mother frequently sent him to beg for money for the family and he started working at a very young age, even though he was attending school. He left school at the age of eleven, after being bullied by his classmates because he wore "shabby" clothes. Around this time, he worked as a livestock herder during the winter, doing so without proper shoes, which caused his feet to be constantly frozen. His younger sister died of fever around this period. In the following years, Ravachol worked as a shepherd but also as a miner and in various other industries in the region. He was once fired from a job for arriving five minutes late, despite having worked many unpaid overtime hours. Around the age of 16, he secured a position in Saint-Chamond as an apprentice dyer with Richard and Puteau. However, this apprenticeship ended without the dyers deciding to keep him on or teach him more about their craft in greater detail. For additional income he played
accordion at society balls on Sundays at
Saint-Étienne for 5 francs per evening.
Militantism, crimes, anarchism When he completed his apprenticeship without success, Ravachol left Saint-Chamond and the Saint-Étienne region to go to
Lyon in search of work. There, he began attending public readings in
study circles that read
socialist and
anarchist newspapers. At the age of 18, Ravachol read the book
The Wandering Jew (1844) by
Eugène Sue, which, according to his own testimony, started his distancing from religious ideas. After a lecture given by the
communard Paule Minck, in which she discussed the
Semaine sanglante (Bloody Week), on 3 December 1881, in Saint-Chamond, he fully completed his break from religion. After being dismissed from a new job along with his brother, he found himself unemployed and in poverty. Unable to provide for his family, Ravachol began by stealing chickens, while his brother stole coal. At the same time, he gradually became an anarchist and started attempting to make bombs, though without success at first. He was already in possession of dangerous materials, as he was arrested after supplying
sulfuric acid to a woman. Meanwhile, Marie and François Ravachol entered into conflict: the mother reproached her son for being in an intimate relationship with a married woman. As a result of these accusations, he severed all ties with his mother. Then, on the night of 14 to 15 May 1891, in
Terrenoire, he dug up the grave of Baroness de la Rochetaillée with the aim of finding and retrieving her jewelry. He found nothing and returned empty-handed. Though seemingly without resources, the elderly man was not poor; he had amassed donations for over fifty years while pretending to be extremely impoverished, which made him a man of relatively considerable wealth. Suddenly, Ravachol then shoved two officers near him with a shoulder blow and fled at high speed towards Terrenoire, where the pursuing police lost his trail in the deep night that had fallen. On 30 July, the press reported on two letters he had sent them—each written in different handwriting. In the first, he mocked the police, saying he had been able to walk around publicly the previous Sunday in Terrenoire, a district of Saint-Étienne.I visited the fine arts exhibition. I found it fairly good. However, I reserved the right to critique some of the paintings later.He also fled to Spain sometime after the murder. This is where he found refuge with Paul Bernard, another exile. It is speculated that during this time in Spain, particularly
Barcelona, Ravachol learned how to make bombs. In August, 1891, he traveled to Paris using a fake name and 'met up with other Parisian anarchists'. At this meeting, he met Henri Louis Descamps' wife, Descamps being one of the arrested and judged during the Clichy affair. There,
Charles Chaumentin and his wife, both anarchist militants, welcomed and hosted him.
Radicalization of 'Ravachol's band' , Ravachol,
Charles Simon,
Joseph Jas-Béala and Charles Chaumartin Ravachol was joined there by Soubère and Jas-Béala, which is probably an indication that the group was already planning to launch attacks targeting the authorities in Paris. managed to seize thirty kilograms of
dynamite by stealing it from the
Soisy-sur-Seine quarry, giving them the possibility to use this significant arsenal in the preparation of attacks.
Bombings in ''
L'Illustration'' (19 March 1892)In the following days, Ravachol and Simon built the bomb, Simon conducted a first reconnaissance of the judge's residence at 136 Boulevard
Saint-Germain, and then the group of four took the tramway to carry out the attack on 11 March 1892. Soubère sat between Simon and Béala and carried the bomb, hiding it under her skirts. She then handed it to Ravachol, who, armed with two loaded pistols, entered the building, placed the bomb on the second floor, the center of the building—since he did not know exactly where Benoît lived. He lit the fuse and fled, while Soubère and Béala stood watch outside. The militant remained on-site to observe the aftermath of the explosion as his companions left the area. According to
Jean Maitron and
Rolf Dupuy, this denunciation by the traitorous anarchist actually provided little help to the police, as the authorities already knew most of the information he provided. was recognized by an employee, Jules Lhérot, who quickly passed the information on to the restaurant's owner, Jean‑Marie Véry. Véry decided to alert the police and denounced Ravachol to the authorities, leading to his arrest. The police became aware of the dangerous situation of their informants and increased security measures around the restaurant. This did not prevent the anarchist militants
Jean-Pierre François and
Théodule Meunier from carrying out the
Véry bombing, where they exacted revenge for Véry's collaboration and succeeded in killing him. The trial opened the next day, on 26 April 1892.
First part of the trial '' (30 April 1892) The trial of Ravachol and his accomplices opened on 26 April 1892 at the
Seine Assizes Court. According to Gilles Ferragu, this was an extraordinary trial for several reasons. First of all, it was divided into two parts: the trial for the Paris bombings was assigned to the Seine Assizes Court, while the trial for the hermit's murder and other crimes that the police accused Ravachol of committing was scheduled for a later date in Montbrison. It was also the first trial of such magnitude for an anarchist terrorist, and a moment of wavering for the republican order established by the
French Third Republic. The authorities were extremely uncomfortable with this trial because they had to balance the appearance of a fair trial—where Ravachol would be able to speak openly and freely to legitimize their judicial system as free—while also preventing the trial from becoming a political platform for the anarchist. The royalist press notably highlighted the paradox of this political trial, which already foreshadowed the
Dreyfus affair, mocking the Third Republic by pointing out that the republicans, who had once advocated insurrection and revolution, were now being outflanked on their left. The authorities then implemented measures aimed at controlling the composition of the jury in their favor and ensuring that the attending public was carefully selected. Later during the
Ère des attentats, laws would be passed to restrict
press freedom during anarchist trials. As for Ravachol, he was assisted by Parisian anarchist circles: his lawyer, Lagasse, former lawyer of one of the arrested during the Clichy affair, referenced a number of militants who helped gather information about the jurors in an attempt to challenge the inclusion of individuals likely to convict Ravachol. The defensive strategy of Ravachol and Lagasse was to highlight the political dimension of the trial and to defend the reason behind the attacks. Ravachol could not read very well, so he began the trial with a written statement on a piece of paper, reading it with difficulty. In it, he declared: During the trial, rumors circulated in the press suggesting that Ravachol and Lagasse were attempting to make
Pierre Martinet, one of the theorists of
individualist anarchism who was imprisoned at the time, speak about anarchism at the court. These events demonstrated that the French state was overwhelmed by the events to the point that, instead of resorting to its usual rhetoric after an attack—where the perpetrator was dehumanized and the restoration of order staged—the press naturally assumed that an anarchist might come to express his opinions during the trial. Anarchism was thus considered legitimate to present as a counterpoint to state ideology within the trial itself by the press, showing the impact of Lagasse's defence. An 'anonymous' juror who quoted in
Le Figaro noted Ravachol's unveiling of the established ritual of the
political trial: Ultimately, Ravachol was found guilty by the jury, with Simon, but with
mitigating circumstances, which made them avoid the death penalty and instead be sentenced to life in
penal labour. Soubère and Béala were acquitted, like Chaumentin. The statement was very probably written by Ravachol with corrections and help from his lawyer and other anarchists. As soon as he was sentenced to death, the authorities sought to carry out his execution as quickly as possible and were pleased that he refused to appeal the sentence.
Execution depicting Ravachol by
Charles Maurin, 1893Ravachol was executed on 11 July 1892 at Montbrison. He spoke briefly with his jailers before being transferred to the guillotine. During these conversations, he first refused to have a drink but then decided to have a glass of wine mixed with water. He openly refused the chaplain and declared to his jailers: Ravachol was then placed in a van and transferred to the execution location. During the travel, he repeatedly sang the sixth stanza of . He was positioned right next to the
guillotine and stepped toward the gathered crowd to speak a few words but was interrupted by the executioners, who placed him in the guillotine before he could finish. His last words, as his head was about to be severed, were: == Posterity ==