The legality of posthumous sperm extraction varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Generally, legislation falls into one of three camps: a full ban, a requirement of written consent from the donor, or implied consent obtained from the family.
Areas with full bans Following the 1984
Parpalaix case in
France, in which the widow of deceased
cancer patient Alain Parpalaix obtained permission from the courts to be inseminated with her husband's spermatozoa after his death, the
Centre d’Etude et de Conservation du Sperme Humain (Center for the Study and Preservation of Human Sperm) petitioned the courts successfully for a full ban on posthumous insemination, in line with the country's ban on
in vitro fertilisation for post-
menopausal women. Similar legislation exists in
Germany,
Sweden,
Taiwan and the
Australian states of
Victoria and
Western Australia. Following the 1997 case of
Regina v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, the terms of the Act were extended to
comatose patients, and so theoretically
assault charges could be (but in this case were not) brought against doctors for overseeing or performing the procedure. Also in Spain it is necessary to have a signed consent from the deceased person and the wife can only use the sample in a period of 12 months.
Areas requiring implied consent In 2003,
Israeli
Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein published several guidelines outlining the legal situation of posthumous sperm retrieval for the purpose of later insemination by a surviving female partner. The guidelines specified firstly that only requests by a partner (married or otherwise) of the deceased would be honoured – requests by other members of the donor's family would be denied. While extraction of the sperm was guaranteed following a request by the partner, permission to use the sperm was to be determined case by case, a court of law deciding on the basis of the effect on the presumed wishes of the donor, and the effect of the procedure on the donor's dignity. If it could be demonstrated that the deceased took definite steps towards parenthood (implied consent), use of extracted sperm by the female partner would generally be permitted. There has been, however, an increasing number of cases in Israel in which women who had not been in a relationship with the deceased, volunteered and were allowed to carry their child, often following a public call-up by the deceased's parents. The first such case concerned an IDF soldier shot in the Gaza Strip in 2002, with a further landmark case in 2007. The mothers have to be willing to raise the children, though. In 2017, a court in Lod denied the parents of a deceased IDF soldier the right to have a surrogate mother carry his child. Rules have somewhat relaxed following the
2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Retrieval has become easier (even being promoted as an option by the IDF) but the deceased's wish for children still has to be demonstrated in court. Jewish religious law frames the conflict primarily as one between the principle of burying the body whole (i.e. not retrieving anything from it after death) and continuing a man's lineage. There is also debate whether the children thus conceived should have access to the same benefits as other
IDF soldiers killed in service.
No legislation Many other countries, including
Belgium and the
United States, ==Ethics==