Consumers have shown passionate support for e-cigarettes that other nicotine replacement products did not receive. They have a mass appeal that could challenge combustible tobacco's market position. Members often see e-cigarettes as a safer alternative to smoking, and some view it as a
hobby. The online forum E-Cig-Reviews.com was one of the first major communities. There are also groups on
Facebook and
Reddit. Online forums based around modding have grown in the vaping community. Vapers embrace activities associated with e-cigarettes and sometimes evangelise for them. E-cigarette companies have a substantial online presence, and there are many individual vapers who blog and tweet about e-cigarette related products. Contempt for
Big Tobacco is part of vaping culture. Tobacco and e-cigarette companies interact with consumers for their policy agenda. Tobacco companies have worked with organizations conceived to promote e-cigarette use, and these organizations have worked to hamper legislation intended at restricting e-cigarette use. . |alt=E-cigarette user blowing a large cloud of aerosol (vapor). This activity is known as cloud-chasing. Large gatherings of vapers, called vape meets, take place around the US. Some
vape shops have a vape bar where patrons can test out different e-liquids and socialize. The Electronic Cigarette Convention in North America which started in 2013, is an annual show where companies and consumers meet up. A subclass of vapers configure their atomizers to produce large amounts of vapor by using low-resistance heating coils. This practice is called "
cloud-chasing". By using a coil with very low resistance, the batteries are stressed to a potentially unsafe extent. As vaping comes under increased scrutiny, some members of the vaping community have voiced their concerns about cloud-chasing, stating the practice gives vapers a bad reputation when doing it in public. The Oxford Dictionaries'
word of the year for 2014 was "vape".
Regulation Regulation of e-cigarettes varies across countries and states, ranging from no regulation to
banning them entirely. For instance, e-cigarettes containing nicotine are illegal in Japan, forcing the market to use
heated tobacco products for cigarette alternatives. Others have introduced strict restrictions and some have licensed devices as medicines such as in the UK. , around two thirds of major nations have regulated e-cigarettes in some way. Because of the potential relationship with tobacco laws and medical drug policies, e-cigarette legislation is being debated in many countries. The companies that make e-cigarettes have been pushing for laws that support their interests. In 2016 the
US Department of Transportation banned the use of e-cigarettes on commercial flights. In 2018, the Royal College of Physicians asked that a balance is found in regulations over e-cigarettes that ensure product safety while encouraging smokers to use them instead of tobacco, as well as keep an eye on any effects contrary to the control agencies for tobacco. The
legal status of e-cigarettes is currently pending in many countries. and India have banned e-cigarettes. In June 2025, Pakistan banned e-cigarettes in the province of Punjab, though the decision was reversed the next month. Canada-wide in 2014, they were technically illegal to sell, as no nicotine-containing e-cigarettes are not regulated by
Health Canada, but this is generally unenforced and they are commonly available for sale Canada-wide. In 2016, Health Canada announced plans to regulate vaping products. In the US and the UK, the use and sale to adults of e-cigarettes are legal. The revised EU Tobacco Products Directive came into effect in May 2016, providing stricter regulations for e-cigarettes. It limits e-cigarette advertising in print, on television and radio, along with reducing the level of nicotine in liquids and reducing the flavors used. It does not ban vaping in public places. It requires the purchaser for e-cigarettes to be at least 18 and does not permit buying them for anyone less than 18 years of age. The updated Tobacco Products Directive has been disputed by
tobacco lobbyists whose businesses could be impacted by these revisions. The US FDA regulates e-cigarettes, e-liquid and all related products. It evaluates ingredients, product features and health risks, as well their appeal to minors and non-users. and their sale in all-ages vending machines is not permitted in the US. In 2016, the US FDA used its authority under the
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act to deem e-cigarette devices and e-liquids to be tobacco products, which meant it intended to regulate the marketing, labelling, and manufacture of devices and liquids; vape shops that mix e-liquids or make or modify devices were considered manufacturing sites that needed to register with US FDA and comply with
good manufacturing practice regulation. E-cigarette and tobacco companies recruited lobbyists in an effort to prevent the US FDA from evaluating e-cigarette products or banning existing products already on the market. In February 2014, the
European Parliament passed regulations requiring standardization and quality control for liquids and vaporizers, disclosure of ingredients in liquids, and child-proofing and tamper-proofing for liquid packaging. In April 2014 the US FDA published proposed regulations for e-cigarettes. In the US some states
tax e-cigarettes as tobacco products, and some state and regional governments have broadened their indoor smoking bans to include e-cigarettes. , 12 US states and 615 localities had prohibited the use of e-cigarettes in venues in which traditional cigarette smoking was prohibited. In November 2020, the New Zealand government passed a vaping regulation that requires vape stores to register as specialist vape retailers before they can sell e-cigarettes, the wider range of flavoured e-liquids, and other related vaping products. Vaping products are required to be notified by the government before they can be sold to ensure that the products are following safety requirements and ingredients in liquids do not contain prohibited substances. E-cigarettes containing nicotine have been listed as drug delivery devices in a number of countries, and the marketing of such products has been restricted or put on hold until safety and efficacy clinical trials are conclusive. Since they do not contain tobacco, television advertising in the US is not restricted. Some countries have regulated e-cigarettes as a
medical product even though they have not approved them as a smoking cessation aid. The emerging phenomenon of e-cigarettes has raised concerns in the health community, governments, and the general public and recommended that e-cigarettes should be regulated to protect consumers. It added, "heavy regulation by restricting access to e-cigarettes would just encourage continuing use of much unhealthier tobacco smoking." Such arguments have featured in debates over national and subnational vaping restrictions. In Australia, federal reforms that took effect on 1 July 2024 restricted legal sales of vapes to pharmacies and banned the commercial supply of disposable and non-therapeutic vapes; critics, including industry groups and
criminology experts, warned that the restrictions could expand an illicit market for vaping products if demand persisted while legal access narrowed. In the United Kingdom, government impact assessment work and contemporaneous media coverage around the planned 2025 ban on sales of single-use vapes included warnings that some vapers could revert or relapse to smoking tobacco. Subsequent reporting in
The BMJ scrutinized widely circulated claims that a disposable-vape ban would result in approximately 200,000 additional smokers. Additionally, San Francisco's chief economist, Ted Egan, when discussing the San Francisco vaping ban said that the city's ban on e-cigarette sales would increase smoking as vapers switch to combustible cigarettes. Critics of smoking bans stress the absurdity of criminalizing the sale of a safer alternative to tobacco while tobacco continues to be legal. In New Zealand, critics responded to a March 2024 ban on disposable e-cigarettes, stating that banning disposables could drive some people return to smoking and encourage a black market for unregulated vaping products. Prominent proponents of smoking bans are not in favor of criminalizing tobacco either, but rather allowing consumers to have the choice to choose whatever products they desire. Critics of this denial noted that research published in Nicotine and Tobacco Research found that smokers who transitioned to Juul products in North America were significantly more likely to switch to vaping than those in the United Kingdom who only had access to lower-strength nicotine products. They also noted that vaping does not contain many of the components that make smoking dangerous such as the combustion process and certain chemicals that are present in cigarettes that are not present in vape products. In addition to these arguments, some critics have cited recent empirical research on policy impacts. In the United States, a 2024 quasi-experimental analysis of survey data published in
JAMA Health Forum reported that state restrictions on flavored e-cigarette sales were associated with reduced daily vaping but increased daily cigarette smoking among adults aged 18-29. A 2025 study in the
Journal of Health Economics similarly reported evidence consistent with substitution from flavored ENDS to cigarettes among certain age groups following the adoption of ENDS flavor restrictions.
Product liability The
US Fire Administration says electronic cigarettes have been combusting and injuring people and surrounding areas. The composition of a cigarette is the cause of this, as the cartridges that contain the liquid mixture are so close to the battery. Beyond individual case reports, population-level surveillance data have also been used to estimate the frequency of e-cigarette-related injuries. A 2024 analysis of US emergency department surveillance data estimated that there were 3,142 ED-treated ENDS/ENNDS product-related injuries from 2012 to 2022. In response to reports of battery-related fires and explosions, US regulators have issued consumer safety guidance. The US Food and Drug Administration has also issued consumer guidance on reducing battery fire and explosion risks, noting that "vape fires and explosions are dangerous" and providing recommendations on charging, storage, and handling. Since the publication of these early reports, the structure of the e-cigarette market has evolved. Subsequent industry developments have included the involvement of major tobacco companies in the e-cigarette market through subsidiaries and acquisitions; for example, British American Tobacco's U.S. unit Reynolds American markets
Vuse products, and in 2023 Altria acquired NJOY's e-vapor product portfolio. In parallel with regulatory scrutiny and industry consolidation, e-cigarette manufacturers have faced significant product liability and
consumer protection litigation. In April 2023, Juul Labs agreed to pay $462 million to settle claims brought by six U.S. states and the District of Columbia alleging unlawful marketing of its products to minors. Public safety concerns related to
lithium ion batteries have also extended beyond consumer use to storage, disposal, and waste handling. Public safety authorities have warned about fire risks associated with lithium ion batteries in disposable e-cigarettes during storage, disposal and waste handling. Ahead of the United Kingdom's disposable vape ban taking effect in June 2025, the Local Government Association cautioned that lithium batteries inside disposable vapes could pose a fire and risk-to-life hazard if not stored correctly. In the UK, these concerns have been reflected in government and media reporting on waste-related fires. In 2025, reporting linked discarded single use vapes to fires in waste collection vehicles and recycling facilities, citing warning from the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and estimates of more than 1,200 battery-related fires at waste sites in 2023.
Marketing They are marketed to people as being safer than traditional cigarettes. They are also marketed to non-smokers. There are growing concerns that e-cigarette
advertising campaigns unjustifiably focus on young adults, adolescents, and women.
Large tobacco companies have greatly increased their marketing efforts. Some companies may use e-cigarette advertising to advocate smoking, deliberately, or inadvertently, is an area of concern. The e-cigarette companies have expanded using aggressive marketing messages like those used to
promote cigarettes in the 1950s and 1960s. As cigarette companies have acquired the largest e-cigarette brands, they currently benefit from a dual market of smokers and e-cigarette users while simultaneously presenting themselves as agents of harm reduction. In the US, six large e-cigarette businesses spent $59.3 million on promoting e-cigarettes in 2013. In the US and Canada, over $2 million is spent yearly on promoting e-cigarettes online. E-cigarette websites often made unscientific health statements in 2012. The ease to get past the
age verification system at e-cigarette company websites allows underage individuals to access and be exposed to marketing.|alt=Displaying a diagram of e-cigarette use among youth is rising as e-cigarette advertising increases. Since at least 2007, e-cigarettes have been heavily promoted across media outlets globally. They are promoted on YouTube by movies with sexual material and music icons, who encourage minors to "take their freedom back." Tobacco companies intensely market e-cigarettes to young people, with industry strategies including cartoon characters and candy flavors. Fruit flavored e-liquid is the most commonly marketed e-liquid flavor on social media. E-cigarette companies commonly promote that their products contain only water, nicotine, glycerin, propylene glycol, and flavoring but this assertion is misleading as researchers have found differing amounts of heavy metals in the vapor, including chromium, nickel, tin, silver, cadmium, mercury, and aluminum. The widespread assertion that e-cigarettes emit "only water vapor" is not true because the evidence demonstrates e-cigarette vapor contains possibly harmful chemicals such as nicotine, carbonyls, metals, and
volatile organic compounds, in addition to particulate matter. Many e-cigarette companies market their products as a smoking cessation aid without evidence of effectiveness. E-cigarette marketing has been found to make unsubstantiated health statements (e.g., that they help one quit smoking) including statements about improving psychiatric symptoms, which may be particularly appealing to smokers with mental illness. Some e-cigarette companies state that their products are
green without supporting evidence which may be purely to increase their sales. Worldwide e-cigarette sales in 2014 were around US$7 billion. Worldwide e-cigarette sales in 2019 were about $19.3 billion. In 2021, the global e-cigarette market was estimated at about US$20.4 billion. In the United States,
Reuters reported (citing Circana retail tracking reviewed by Reuters) that illegal sales of flavored disposable vapes reached about $2.4 billion in 2024 and accounted for roughly 35% of all e-cigarette sales in mainstream retail outlets tracked by
Circana; Circana estimated the total tracked vape market at $6.8 billion, excluding online and specialty store sales.
Sales channels and measurement Approximately 30–50% of total e-cigarettes sales are handled on the internet. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission reported that, for major manufacturers it surveyed, direct sales accounted for 8.13% of reported e-cigarette sales in 2019 and 7.09% in 2020, with most reported sales occurring indirectly through retail channels. Retail-sales datasets used in market reporting may also exclude online and specialty vape-shop channels.
Industry structure and supply chains Established tobacco companies have a significant share of the e-cigarette market. , 95% of e-cigarette devices were made in China, mainly in
Shenzhen. More recent policy reporting and official analysis continue to link a substantial share of product supply to imported devices, including from China, as well as to cross-border e-commerce channels for some products. Chinese companies' market share of e-liquid is low. In 2014, online and offline sales started to increase. Large tobacco retailers are leading the cigalike market. "We saw the market's sudden recognition that the cigarette industry seems to be in serious trouble, disrupted by the rise of vaping,"
Mad Money's
Jim Cramer stated April 2018. In 2019, a vaping industry organization released a report stating that a possible US ban on e-cigarettes flavors can potentially effect greater than 150,000
jobs around the US.
United States market (brands, formats, and recent changes) The leading seller in the e-cigarette market in the US is the Juul e-cigarette, which was introduced in June 2015. On 17 July 2018 Reynolds announced it will debut in August 2018 a
pod mod type device similar Juul. The popularity of the Juul pod system has led to a flood of other pod devices hitting the market. Since 2018 the US e-cigarette market has shifted. During January 2020-December 2022, disposable cigarette unit share increased from 24.7% to 51.8%, while prefilled cartridge share decreased from 75.2% to 48.0%. For the four-week period ending December 25,2022, the top-selling brands were Vuse, JUUL, Elf Bar, NJOY, and Breeze Smoke. In the 52 weeks ended June 15, 2024, Vuse Alto products represented approximately 40% of U.S. e-cigarette sales in stores tracked by NielsenIQ, according to an analyst cited by The Wall Street Journal. In the US the Federal Trade Commission reported that e-cigarette product sales for major reporting manufacturers rose to $2.703 billion in 2019 and then declined to $2.224 billion in 2020, with the FTC noting this may reflect a shift to other market participants. Altria Group, one of the largest tobacco companies in the United States and the owner of Philip Morris USA, has significant investments in the domestic e-cigarette market. In January 2025, Altria said it was reassessing its 2028 "smoke-free" volume and revenue goals, citing competition from disposable vapes, and estimated that illicit disposable products represent 60% or more of the U.S. e-cigarette category despite lacking required authorizations. US authorities reported intensified enforcement actions against unauthorized e-cigarettes in 2025, including seizures of 4.7 million units valued at $86.5 million in a Chicago-based operation; US agencies also reported blocking more than 6 million unauthorized e-cigarettes worth over $120 million that year.
Canada, United Kingdom, and Europe In Canada, e-cigarettes had an estimated value of 140 million CAD in 2015. There are numerous e-cigarette retail shops in Canada. A 2014 audit of retailers in four Canadian cities found that 94% of grocery stores, convenience stores, and tobacconist shops which sold e-cigarettes sold nicotine-free varieties only, while all vape shops stocked at least one nicotine-containing product. By 2015, the e-cigarette market had only reached a twentieth of the size of the tobacco market in the UK. In the UK in 2015 the "most prominent brands of cigalikes" were owned by tobacco companies, however, with the exception of one model, all the tank types came from "non-tobacco industry companies". Yet some tobacco industry products, while using prefilled cartridges, resemble tank models. By 2023, 1 survey by the Local Data Company counted 3,573 specialist vape shops in the UK, and NIQ data cited in press reporting put value sales of vaping products in Britain at £897.4 million. Sky News similarly reported that more than 230 independent vape shops opened in 2023, citing the same Local Data Company survey. France's e-cigarette market was estimated by Groupe Xerfi to be
€130 million in 2015. In December 2015, there were 2,400 vape shops in France, 400 fewer than in March of the same year.
Vietnam and wide tobacco-related costs In
Vietnam, the e-cigarette market is growing rapidly, with the use rate increasing 18 times from 2015 to 2020. The use rate of e-cigarettes in adolescents aged 13–15 is 3.5%, up 1.6% from 2019. According to estimates by the
World Health Organization (WHO), the global economic losses caused by tobacco each year are $1.4 trillion. Economic losses caused by tobacco are estimated to account for 1% of GDP. The
Vietnamese government is making efforts to control the e-cigarette market. However, here are still many challenges to be addressed, such as consumer's lack of understanding of the harm of e-cigarettes, unclear legal regulations, and fierce competition from imported e-cigarette products. == Environmental impact ==