In 1829, Hampden returned to Oxford and in May 1830 became one of the tutors at Oriel where a disagreement about the tutors' duties led to
John Henry Newman,
Hurrell Froude, and
Robert Wilberforce being relieved of their duties. Hampden was chosen to deliver the prestigious
Bampton Lectures for 1832, in which he attempted to disentangle the original truth of Christianity from later accretions and superstitions, particularly scholastic philosophy. At the time, some thought he had committed himself to a heretical view of the
Trinity akin to
Socinianism and
Sabellianism, but serious questioning only started after the publication of his
Observations on Religious Dissent in 1834, and wide-ranging outrage was sparked in 1836 after his nomination to the
Regius Professorship of Divinity. In 1833, he moved from a tutorship at Oriel to become Principal of
St Mary Hall, Oxford. In 1834, he was appointed
White's Professor of Moral Philosophy without any adverse comment in preference to Newman.
Wider background of the conflicts The years 1815–1914 were a time of radical social and political change in which religion played a significant role. Politically the Church of England was overwhelmingly Tory and opposed to political reform. At the start of this period, many Anglicans equated the religious well–being of the country to that of their own church while Protestant and Catholic dissidents suffered under discriminatory religious legislation. The Whig party and its reforming programme relied heavily on the support of Protestant dissidents who saw the parish priest as "the black recruiting–sergeant against us". Feelings ran very high, particularly between 1825 and 1850. Despite the recent, partial relief afforded by the repeal of the
Test and
Corporation Acts and the
Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829, non-Anglicans still suffered from serious discrimination. The tensions had been worsened by the actions of 21 bishops in voting against the reform of Parliament in 1831 while only 3 voted in favour. Had all voted in favour the Bill would have passed. Oxford and Cambridge Universities played a central role in the Church of England. They were wholly Anglican institutions. At Oxford, students had to subscribe to the
Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England as part of the admission process; while at Cambridge no one could graduate without doing so. They were the principal nurseries of Anglican clergy and extremely influential in the country in general. The passing of the
Reform Bill in 1832 did little to ease the tensions since the widened franchise produced a reforming parliament in which the more radical members obviously had ecclesiastical abuses in their sights as part of a very wide-ranging programme. Many dissenters campaigned for the disestablishment of the Church of England and the Government's decision to merge ten dioceses of the
Church of Ireland with their neighbours was seen as a serious threat to the Church of England when carried into effect by the
Church Temporalities (Ireland) Act 1833 (
3 & 4 Will. 4. c. 37). It was the direct cause of
John Keble's famous assize sermon on "National Apostasy" at Oxford the following year and this in its turn led to the Tractarian Movement. By 1834, the tensions between dissenters and churchmen had reached unprecedented levels, probably because the dissenters sensed the Church of England would cling to its remaining privileges.
Observations on Religious Dissent In the summer of 1834, a bill to abolish subscription on admission to a university or on taking any degree rather than requiring a subscription to the
39 Articles of the Church of England was rejected by the House of Lords. Hampden entered the public arena in August by publishing
Observations on Religious Dissent in support of the admission of non-
Anglicans to Oxford University on the strength of a simple declaration of faith. Even so, urged by the Duke of Wellington (recently elected Chancellor), on 10 November the heads of the Oxford Colleges recognised that public feeling was opposed to making schoolboys subscribe to the Articles on matriculation and by a single vote agreed to abolish the practice. Hampden then produced a second edition of the pamphlet and sent a copy to
John Henry Newman who, while recognising its "tone of piety" regretted that the arguments of the work tended "altogether to make shipwreck of the Christian faith". Debate via published works and personal acrimony between the two scholars continued for two years. The decision of the heads of Colleges was rescinded but revived in March of the following year when a motion to that effect was roundly defeated in Convocation by 459 votes to 57 where all Masters of Arts whether resident or not had the right to vote and all types of traditionalist MAs combined to defeat it. A few months later, Lord Radnor introduced a parliamentary bill with the same object and Hampden was the only resident to speak out openly in favour. He became the chief target of a book on the subscription issue edited by Newman who accused Hampden of being a Socinian in it.
Regius Professor In 1836 the Regius Professor of Divinity died suddenly and the Whig Prime Minister,
Lord Melbourne, offered the post to Hampden. (The only other clergyman from Oxford who in Whig eyes deserved preferment was
Thomas Arnold of
Rugby School but he was already regarded as a heretic in conservative church circles). The news leaked out before the appointment was confirmed and opposition was quickly organised in the hope of preventing it. It came from three different groups. A few high churchmen and evangelicals genuinely believed him to hold heretical views and therefore to be unfit to train future clergymen; a large number of Oxford graduates resented the favour shown to the author of
Observations on Religious Dissent; and a large number of
Tory supporters throughout the country seized the chance of harrying a Whig government. Despite all the objections, Melbourne pushed the nomination through and Hampden became the Regius Professor of Divinity. Melbourne told the
House of Lords when the appointment was debated, with brutal frankness that few if any of them had the expert knowledge to have an informed opinion on the matter. ==Bishop of Hereford==