of 1813, showing the domed end of its return-flue boiler (centre of picture) A simple flue must be long if it is to offer adequate heating area. In a short boiler shell, such as required for a
steam locomotive, this may be done by using a U-shaped
return flue that bends back on itself.
Richard Trevithick had already used a return flue with his first 1802
Coalbrookdale locomotive design and 1804
"Pen-y-Darren" engine. This did make work easier for the fireman however, as he was no longer trying to reach a
firedoor beneath the long crosshead of the piston.
William Hedley used this pattern of boiler for his 1813 locomotives
Puffing Billy and
Wylam Dilly. Through the
Wylam colliery and its owner
Christopher Blackett, Hedley would have been familiar with Trevithick's engine.
Timothy Hackworth's 0-6-0
Royal George of 1827 also used a return-flued boiler, although it is best known for its pioneering use of a deliberate
blastpipe to encourage draught on the fire. These were not, however, return-
flue boilers in the sense used here, but rather
return-tube boilers. They had a single large cylindrical furnace tube, a combustion chamber external to the boiler's pressure shell, then
multiple, narrow fire-tubes returning to a horseshoe-shaped
smokebox above and around the firedoor. The proximity of this smokebox to the fireman led to their nickname of "belly burners". Their design thus has more in common with the horizontal
launch-type boilers (as used by
Sir Arthur Heywood) or the
Scotch marine boiler than they do with the simple single-flue boiler. By this time, the
locomotive boiler had become ubiquitous for traction engines. Compared to this, the advantage of the Huber boiler was that the firetubes could be replaced more easily, without needing to work from within an enclosed firebox. ==Cornish boiler==