Upon its original release, film critic and future director
François Truffaut praised the film, stating that "Out of the worst crime novel I ever read, Jules Dassin has made the best crime film I've ever seen" and "Everything in
Le Rififi is intelligent: screenplay, dialogue, sets, music, choice of actors. Jean Servais, Robert Manuel, and Jules Dassin are perfect." French critic
André Bazin said that
Rififi brought the genre a "sincerity and humanity that break with the conventions of a crime film, and manage to touch our hearts". In the February 1956 issue of the French film magazine
Cahiers du cinéma, the film was listed as number thirteen in the top twenty films of 1955. The film was well received by British critics who noted the film's violence on its initial release.
The Daily Mirror referred to the film as "brilliant and brutal" while the
Daily Herald made note that
Rififi would "make American attempts at screen brutality look like a tea party in cathedral city". The
National Board of Review nominated the film as the Best Foreign Film in 1956.
Rififi was re-released for a limited run within America on 21 July 2000 in a new 35 mm print containing new, more explicit
subtitles that were enhanced in collaboration with Dassin. The film was received very well by American critics on its re-release. The film ranking website
Rotten Tomatoes reported that 93% of critics had given the film positive reviews, based upon a sample of 41. At
Metacritic, which assigns a
normalized rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film has received an
average score of 97, based on 13 reviews. Among negative reviews of the film,
Dave Kehr of the
Chicago Reader felt that "the film turns moralistic and sour in the last half, when the thieves fall out." The critic and director
Jean-Luc Godard regarded the film negatively in comparison to other French crime films of the era, noting in 1986 that "today it can't hold a candle to
Touchez pas au grisbi which paved the way for it, let alone
Bob le flambeur which it paved the way for." ==See also==