In the late 20th century, there had been several proposals to develop structures over the rail yard. These included the Litho City plan in 1965 and various plans by New York City's Educational Construction Fund in the late 1960s. In his book
New York 2000,
Robert A. M. Stern described the site as "one of the city's most coveted and contested parcels of open land". There would be six 47-story buildings and three 41-story buildings, all designed by
Kelly & Gruzen. The development would have included 200 artists' studios that faced north; the rest of the units would be structured as rental apartments or
housing cooperatives. or 25,000 people. Nonetheless, the union's president
Edward Swayduck and the city's traffic commissioner
Henry A. Barnes both endorsed the Litho City plan. The CPC designated the West Side rail yard as an urban renewal site in October 1962, allowing the plans for Litho City to proceed. Shortly afterward, the Amalgamated Lithographers Union announced plans for a $15 million dormitory in the development, which would house 1,000 foreign students. Plans also called for a promenade linking to
Lincoln Center, in addition to a park on the Hudson River shoreline. A
scale model of Litho City was unveiled at
Grand Central Terminal in 1963. There were to be 6,000 apartments, and a new street, running parallel to the yard between 66th and 70th streets, was also proposed. Moses also planned to build an exit from the
West Side Highway to Litho City, prompting objections that the street grid could not handle the additional traffic. The plans for Litho City were formally dropped in January 1966 due to disputes over the
air rights; the railroad had terminated the union's lease of the site two months prior. In the late 1960s, there were various proposals by the city's Educational Construction Fund for mixed residential and school projects, also partly on landfill. This development would have included several athletic fields and between 6,000 and 12,000 apartments. The state rejected that proposal because of the presumed negative effect on development opportunities and because it would violate the Blumenthal Amendment, which prohibited any highway construction that would alter Riverside Park.
First Trump proposal and sale In July 1974, Trump Enterprises Inc., a company controlled by Trump, offered to buy an
option on the 60th Street Yard and the
30th Street Yard for a combined $100 million. Trump did not make a
down payment. Penn Central, which at the time was under
trusteeship due to its insolvency, petitioned its trustees to approve the sale. Following a private meeting with Trump, his father
Fred, and Mayor
Abraham Beame, Penn Central's trustees gave the option to Trump because he "seemed best positioned [...] to get rezoning and government financing". Local politicians including U.S. Representative
Bella Abzug expressed concerns about the fact that the 60th Street redevelopment would cater mostly to middle- and upper-class families. Trump's plan called for the
West Side Highway to be relocated inward to provide more space near the river, which the Department of City Planning endorsed in concept. There would have been 14,500 apartments on the site, funded with federal subsidies.
Manhattan Community Board 7, representing the neighborhood that included the rail yard, opposed the plan. Trump apparently never got far enough with his plan to persuade them otherwise. Trump's proposal was dependent on public financing that never materialized. He tried various architectural schemes and twice downsized his plans for the yards. Had Trump finalized the acquisition, he would have been required to make payments over 18–30 months, after which he could take
title to the site. However, Trump never finalized his purchase, and his father's longtime friend
Abe Hirschfeld agreed to take over the option instead. By then, the city government was contemplating building a freight yard for
piggyback trains on the site. Penn Central signed a sale contract in March 1980, agreeing to sell Hirschfeld and his son
Elie the site for $28 million. Under the terms of the contract, the Hirschfelds made a $400,000 down payment and were required to spend $700,000 on planning over the next year. Varsavsky's company, the
Macri Group, became the project's majority partner, with a 65% ownership stake; the Hirschfelds held the remaining 35% stake. Macri hired
Gruzen & Partners to draw up plans for the project, and he hired former deputy mayor
John Zuccotti and lawyer
Judah Gribetz to consult on the project. The initial plans, announced in January 1981, called for 16 residential towers with a total of 4,850 apartments, arranged around a new avenue called Lincoln Boulevard. Due to the topography of the site, the buildings at both the northern and southern ends would have been located on a platform, and Lincoln Boulevard would have been built with two levels. The plans had to undergo community review. Opponents claimed that the development would overload the area's infrastructure, and other critics took issue with the development's size and the lack of
affordable housing. The EIS found that the project would create 7,000 jobs, but that it would also overload existing transit infrastructure due to the presence of 9,200 additional commuters. Community Board 7 refused to support the project unless it was downscaled to include fewer than 4,000 residential units. Ultimately, Hirschfeld and Varsavsky agreed to pay for infrastructure improvements in the neighborhood.
The New York Times architecture critic
Paul Goldberger wrote that, while he preferred a design that "look[ed] like the tightly woven cityscape of Riverside Drive or Central Park West," he hoped that the project was not "studied and debated and talked out of existence" by too much public review. Macri sent the plans to the CPC for review in March 1982 but, despite the concerns over Lincoln West's size, initially refused to scale down the plans. The same month, the city asked Lincoln West Associates to postpone its plans so the city could decide whether to build a new freight terminal there, and Lincoln West Associates agreed to restart the community review process. The engineering firm
Tippetts Abbett McCarthy Stratton conducted a feasibility study of the proposed freight-rail center, finding that it was feasible to build it under Lincoln West, though Varsavsky opposed the freight center.
Approval, lawsuits, and modifications The CPC approved the Lincoln West plans in July 1982, disregarding most of the opponents' objections to the project, although it asked the developers to reduce the project's size. The
New York City Board of Estimate also gave its approval that September. The plans called for 1,100 rental apartments (of which one-fifth would be affordable housing), in addition to 3,200 luxury co-ops or condos. Lincoln West Associates paid $13 million for the northern five blocks shortly after the plans were approved, and it paid $21.6 million that December for the southern eight blocks. The developers had planned to begin construction in April 1983,
Francisco Macri took over Varsavsky's 65% interest in the project. The EIS was invalidated the next month, though the city government successfully appealed the ruling. The
New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, ruled in October 1983 that the EIS had been prepared properly. In addition,
Harry Helmsley, who owned an option on a
superblock from 61st to 65th streets, sued the city and Lincoln West Associates, claiming that the city wanted to build three streets through his property. Though work had still not begun by early 1984, Lincoln West's developers were already revising the plans significantly, prompting its chairman to resign. Additionally, in July 1984,
Chase Manhattan Bank moved to foreclose on two mortgages that had been placed on the site. The city government would have canceled the development if the street grid had not received final approval by that September, but the Board of Estimate voted to extend the deadline by one month. That October, the Board of Estimate approved plans for Lincoln West's street grid and voted to give Lincoln West Associates four additional months to obtain financing. By then, public officials doubted that Lincoln West would ever be completed, amid continued opposition to the project. Lincoln West Associates ultimately could not receive financing for the development, partly because of Macri's concessions to the city and partly because Trump was trying to retake control of the site.
Television City Trump negotiated to repurchase Lincoln West in mid-1984; he initially decided against it Trump announced in December 1984 that he would pay $95 million for the Lincoln West site; this was part of a $115 million transaction that gave him control of the rail yard. He hired the Chicago–based architect
Helmut Jahn in January 1985 to design the as-yet-unnamed development on the site. Trump, who called the Lincoln West tract "one of the best pieces of real estate in the country," contemplated erecting up to 8,000 apartments there. He also wanted to build a
supertall skyscraper, following two unsuccessful approvals to build such a tower at the
New York Coliseum site and on
Wall Street.
Initial plan In November 1985, Trump announced plans for the Television City complex, which would feature a television studio headquarters. The plan involved 7,900 apartments, along with retail, office, and
television studio space. The skyscraper would have included 750 hotel rooms and 60 floors of residences, and it would have been tall, making it the
world's tallest building. or 76 stories high, would flank the 150-story tower, of parkland, and of retail space. Shortly after the plans were announced, Trump and the media company
NBC discussed the possibility of relocating NBC's headquarters from
Rockefeller Center to Television City. Trump met with other television networks as well, including
ABC and
CBS. The urban planner
Norman Levin, who had formerly worked for Gruzen, was in charge of 20 separate teams who were working on the project. Goldberger wrote that Television City was "woefully simplistic" and that the towers' designs had only a tenuous relationship with the street grid.
New York Magazine architecture critic Carter Wiseman agreed, writing "isolated towers", such as those proposed in Television City, "survive in most of the world's major cities as reminders to planners that this brand of angst-inducing exclusivity is nasty to live with". A writer for the
New York Daily News described the buildings as "intimidating and psychologically disturbing, dwarfing everything that's human in scale". The proposal needed both a new EIS and a public review, The project soon received large amounts of opposition. Local residents expressed skepticism to the project, citing its size and the fact that it targeted the upper middle class. The Coalition Against Lincoln West called Television City "doubly excessive", dubbing it as even more extreme than the Lincoln West plan, while other opponents were specifically against the 150-story tower. Trump was initially reluctant to acquiesce to opponents' demands, fearing that doing so would endanger the development. Trump tentatively agreed to sell
Kumagai Gumi a 25% ownership stake in the development in 1986, but the agreement was rescinded due to disagreements over how much Kumagai Gumi was to pay.
Changes in plans When it became clear that Helmut Jahn's plan would not be approved by the City Planning Commission, Jahn remained the architect for the proposed supertall tower.
Newsday described Cooper as having a "sensitivity to scale" that contrasted with Trump's bold style. Trump and Cooper announced revised plans for Television City in October 1986. Justifying the World's Tallest Building, which would still have 136 stories rather than 150 stories, Cooper claimed that the supertall tower would include less office floor area than the
Sears Tower or either of the
World Trade Center's twin towers. By early 1987, Trump was negotiating to lease the entirety of the supertall skyscraper's office space to
General Electric (GE), which at the time owned NBC. Trump offered to sell the site to the
New York State Urban Development Corporation and lease it back for 99 years. In exchange, Trump would have received a 20-year or 30-year
tax abatement for Television City, Despite widespread public support for Trump's tax abatement, Trump called on Koch to resign, and Koch compared Trump to "a stuck pig". The plans called for 11 residential buildings, about of office space, several parks, and a 152-story tower by mid-1987. The department store chain
Bloomingdale's negotiated to lease space in Television City as well. The project continued to face major opposition; Trump indicated that September that he wanted to sell NBC part of the Television City parcel for $20 million, and he also tried to entice
financial services firms to move there. The Trump Organization also conducted a new EIS to appease opponents' concerns about Television City. The new EIS, published in October 1987, found that the development would cast shadows on the neighborhood, overload local transportation infrastructure, and interfere with television broadcasts. New Yorkers for Parks, then known as The Parks Council, commissioned a scale model of Television City, which it used to demonstrate shadows that the development would create on Riverside Park and the high winds the tall tower would create on its own parks.
Renaming and further revisions At the end of October 1987, NBC decided against moving to Television City, even as Trump Organization officials claimed that the EIS was close to being approved. Afterward, Trump initially planned to replace the television studio with a park or movie theater, even while preserving other aspects of the plans. The 150-story tower was retained, and there were to be 13 smaller towers. Goldberger wrote that Trump had added the affordable housing units to increase the likelihood of getting community approval, a sentiment shared by the project's opponents. By October 1988, Trump fueled speculation that he might sell the site. Despite receiving five offers, all for hundreds of millions of dollars, if his claims can be believed, Trump ultimately decided to keep the site. Westpride, which had 4,200 members at the end of 1988, continued to fight Trump City, and local civic groups promised to sue the city government if Trump City were approved. A main target would be Trump's suggested air rights transfer of from a tract under the Hudson River to the rest of Trump City. Meanwhile, Community Board 7 and the
Municipal Art Society jointly sponsored a "West Side Futures" study that recommended extending Riverside Park and the Manhattan street grid through the site, and limiting building density to a moderate level. Furthermore, delays arose in 1989 when the city government investigated complaints that the Trump Organization was relocating possibly-contaminated dirt from Trump City to
Fresh Kills Landfill. In early 1990, Trump submitted a draft EIS to the
New York City Council, which called for the structures to be built in several phases. Goldberger wrote that Trump City had turned into "a national symbol both of massive, overreaching development and of diehard community opposition to it". By that August, routine scaled-down plans for the site required by environmental review procedures fueled speculation that the Trump City proposal would collapse. However environmental review continued and was completed around February 1991.
Manhattan West and ABC proposals In 1985, the developer
Daniel Brodsky acquired the land just east of the yard between 61st and 64th streets. He proposed a development known as Manhattan West, which initially called for 1,375 apartments, By 1987, his plans called for 1,200 affordable and luxury apartments across more than , in addition to of parkland. The apartments would have been located in an L-shaped building with several roofs measuring up to 39 stories high, as well as 28-story building to the south. A new version of the plan, with 1,000 apartments and only , was proposed in 1989. Meanwhile, Brodsky had sold off the northernmost of the Manhattan West site to
Capital Cities/ABC in 1986. By the 1990s, Capital Cities/ABC was planning to erect three 39-story residential buildings and several television studios. The residential buildings, with a combined 930 units, would have been located from 64th to 65th streets, while the studios would have been located to the north. Capital Cities/ABC then canceled one of the towers and downsized the project to 500 apartments. == Riverside South ==