•
Vernon v Bethell (1762) 28 ER 838, "necessitous men are not, truly speaking, free men, but, to answer a present exigency, will submit to any terms that the crafty may impose upon them." •
Shanley v Harvey (1763) 2 Eden 126, 127, as "soon as a man sets foot on English ground he is free". •
Brown v Peck (1758) 1 Eden 140, provisions discouraging cohabitation were void against public policy, as where a will promised £5 a month to a beneficiary to split up from her husband, or £2 otherwise. She was entitled to the £5. •
Hussey v. Dillon 2 Amb 603, 604, testament and meaning of "grandchildren" • 1 Eden 5, "The Court has always in cases of this nature considered the question of consent with great latitude, adhering to the spirit and not the letter. The maxim Qui tacet satis loquitur has therefore been respected, and constructive consents have been looked upon as entitled to as much regard as if conveyed in express terms". •
Earl of Buckinghamshire v Drury •
Pike v Hoare, 2 Eden, 182; Amb. 428, on conflict of laws, a will affecting lands in the Colonies "is not triable" in this country. •
Burgess v Wheate 1 Eden, 251 ==Notes==