In 1848, the English
zoologist Hugh Edwin Strickland called attention to a bird mentioned in the French traveller
François Leguat's 1708
memoir A New Voyage to the East Indies about his stay on the
Mascarene island of
Rodrigues from 1691–93. Leguat referred to the birds as "gelinottes" (translated as "wood-hens"), a name Strickland thought implied the
grouse of Europe, though this was not consistent with the form of the beak described by Leguat. Strickland was unable to classify the bird further, but noted similarities with the
dodo and
kiwi, based on unidentified birds from Mauritius illustrated by the travellers
Pieter van den Broecke and
Sir Thomas Herbert, which he thought related. Strickland also noted similarities with a bird from
Mauritius, which would later be identified as the
red rail (
Aphanapteryx bonasia). Milne-Edwards connected Leguat's account with three bones (a
sternum, a
tarsometatarsus, and a fragmentary skull) found in caves of the Plaine Corail region, Rodrigues. He recognised their similarity to those of the red rail, while noting it supposedly had a straighter beak (as described by Leguat). Milne-Edwards coined the generic name
Erythromachus from the Greek words , "red", and , "battle" (also translated as "hostile to red"), in reference to its attraction to red objects, and the specific name is in honour of Leguat. The American ornithologist
James Greenway suggested in 1967 that Leguat's description referred to wind-blown
purple swamphens, since the word grey is sometimes used synonymously with blue in old descriptions. This idea has not been accepted by other commentators.
Evolution , by
Hoefnagel, ca. 1610|alt=painting of red rail Apart from being a close relative to the red rail, the relationships of the Rodrigues rail are uncertain and the two are commonly listed as separate genera,
Aphanapteryx and
Erythromachus, but have
sometimes been united as species of
Aphanapteryx. In 1945, the French palaeontologist
Jean Piveteau found skull features of the two species different enough for generic separation, and in 1977, the American ornithologist
Storrs L. Olson stated that though the two species were similar and derived from the same stock, they had also diverged considerably, and should possibly be kept separate. Based on geographic location and the morphology of the
nasal bones, Olson suggested that they were related to the genera
Gallirallus,
Dryolimnas,
Atlantisia, and
Rallus. The American ornithologist
Bradley C. Livezey was unable to determine the affinities of the Rodrigues and red rail in 1998, stating that some of the features uniting them and some other rails were associated with the
loss of flight rather than common descent. He also suggested that the grouping of the Rodrigues and red rail into the same genus may have been influenced by their geographical distribution. Mourer-Chauviré and colleagues also considered the two as belonging to separate genera. Rails have reached many oceanic
archipelagos, which has frequently led to
speciation and evolution of
flightlessness. According to the British researchers Anthony S. Cheke and
Julian P. Hume in 2008, the fact that the red rail lost much of its feather structure indicates it was isolated for a long time. These rails may be of Asian origin, like many other Mascarene birds. In 2019, Hume supported the distinction of the two genera, and cited the relation between the extinct
Mauritius scops owl and the
Rodrigues scops owl as another example of the diverging evolutionary paths on these islands. He stated that the relationships of the Rodrigues and red rails was more unclear than that of other extinct Mascarene rails, with many of their distinct features being related to flightlessness and modifications to their jaws due to their diet, suggesting a long period of isolation. He suggested their ancestors could have arrived on the Mascarenes during the middle
Miocene at the earliest, but it may have happened more recently. The speed with which these features evolved may also have been affected by gene flow, resource availability, and climate events. Flightlessness can evolve rapidly in rails, sometimes repeatedly within the same groups, as in
Dryolimnas, so the distinctness of the Rodrigues and red rails may not have taken long to evolve; some other specialised rails evolved in less than 1–3 million years. Hume suggested that the two rails were probably related to
Dryolimnas, but their considerably different morphology made it difficult to establish how. In general, rails are adept at colonising islands, and can become flightless within a few generations in environments without predators, yet this also makes them vulnerable to human activities. == Description ==