Roman bankers provided a wide variety of services. They would serve as
cashiers and
money changers, they could sell goods at auctions, and they could
determine the material and quality of
currency or open
money bases. If this base was irregular or open then the banker was permitted to reinvest or reuse the client's money. Their activities were concluded and recorded with written agreements. In early Roman history most contracts were conducted orally, with witnesses used to confirm the legitimacy of the agreement. Later
notaries were used to keep public written records of contracts. Roman bankers belonged to the
plebeian or
freedmen classes rather than the aristocracy. They sometimes became very wealthy. Typically they organized themselves into groups of two or three members. Many children of these bankers achieved
equestrian rank. These accounts were entered in a register. If a Roman was involved in a
lawsuit, they were required to create these accounts. This was because these accounts were considered reliable proof in lawsuit cases. Bankers participated in the
receptum argentarii, an agreement that involved three people: the banker, the client, and the third party. The banker would pay the money the client owned to the third party.
Stipulation was common in ancient Rome: the debtor was questioned by the
creditor in the presence of witnesses, about their willingness to pay back the debt. Written contracts were used to document the transfer of the creditor's loan to the debtor. These contracts were usually simple, due to the illiteracy of the Roman population. Since Roman banks lacked any incentive to ensure that their client's deposits would remain safe during a
bank run, they usually kept
less in reserves than the full amount of their clients deposits. They were not required to insure their customers' deposits. The
coactores and the
argentarii also gave credit to buyers at auctions. Although these financial services were necessary for starting a business, almost all Romans would have engaged in credit. Most credit arrangements lasted a month, with an interest rate of 1%, per month. People who provided credit might also have sold their right to collect the debt to another party. In ancient Rome, credit transactions relied on trust. It was common for people to lose trust in their creditors, often resulting in a significant negative impact on the economy and the credit industry.
Loans Loan defaults carried severe penalties, as their borrowers could be
enslaved, mutilated, or sued. Most ancient Roman loans were linked to
consumption. These loans allowed merchants to restock their goods more quickly and it allowed them to purchase more goods. Usually Roman loans were given to young nobles, and they generally had high interest rates. Another common option was to give loans to close family or friends as a method of averting risk. It is possible that ancient Roman loans lacked a
security deposit. However, ancient loans required some form of
security. Usually, loans were made and credits were extended on risky terms, because the available capital typically exceeded the amount needed by borrowers. The senatorial elite were heavily involved in private lending, as both creditors and borrowers, and made loans from their personal fortunes on the basis of social connections. == See also ==