Although the explosion and resulting fumes caused injuries including the lungs of three fire-fighters who remained off-duty indefinitely, the material scattered around the site was found to be non-hazardous for clean-up purposes. The two fire engines that arrived first were scrapped due to the damage. The
Ventura County Sheriff declared a local emergency so the Ventura County Board of Supervisors could ratify the action and allow the county to seek reimbursement for its costs from state disaster relief funds. The only other commercial facility for disposal of oil field waste in the county, operated by
Anterra Corp. in Oxnard, temporarily expanded operations after the incident. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency oversaw the decontamination of the site. The material was neutralized and solidified on site. On August 7, 2015, a Ventura County grand jury indicted the Santa Clara Waste Water Co., the affiliated Green Compass and nine company executives and managers. Following the indictment, the
district attorney had the nine defendants arrested on suspicion of several felonies and misdemeanors, including filing a false or forged instrument, dissuading a witness from reporting a crime, known failure to warn of serious concealed danger, withholding information regarding a substantial danger to public safety, conspiracy to commit a crime, causing impairment of an employee's body, and disposal of hazardous waste. The individuals pleaded guilty or no contest. The two corporate entities reached an agreement in June 2019 after they had already paid about $800,000 in restitution. With the permit to operate suspended, the firm needed to finish removing the waste materials and provide a plan that would show how another such incident would be prevented before being allowed to start accepting liquid waste again. County regulators and county supervisors also wanted the city of Oxnard to agree to accept the waste water again after an analysis of the safety of the pipeline. In 2024, the planning director requested that the board of supervisors consider a permanent revocation of the permit. A new owner, who acquired the property out of bankruptcy, planned to redevelopment the property in a way that did require the existing special use permit. ==References==