Box office Saw VI opened in 3,036 theaters on 4,000 screens and earned $6.9 million on its opening day, in second place behind
Paranormal Activity which grossed $7.5 million that day during its second weekend of wide release. It grossed $14.1 million its opening weekend, which is the lowest of all the
Saw films. It remained at number two behind
Paranormal Activity which was playing on only 64% as many screens as
Saw VI, but made 67% more money. On Halloween weekend, it moved down to number six and made $5.2 million, a 63% decrease in ticket sales from the previous weekend. By its third weekend it declined in sales by 61% and was removed from 945 theaters. It fell into 11th place with $2 million. By its fourth weekend, ticket sales declined by 78% and the film was pulled from 1,314 theaters; it made $449,512. On its fifth and final weekend it made $91,875, an 80% decrease, and it was pulled from an additional 599 theaters. It was being shown in 178 theaters by the end of its run. The film closed out of theaters on , after 35 days.
Saw VI began its international run in tenth place with $4.7 million on 946 screens in 11 markets. It opened in the United Kingdom in second place behind
Up, grossing $2.6 million on 375 screens. In Australia, it opened at fourth place with earnings of $846,000 on 164 screens. In its second week it came in eighth place with $4.4 million on 1,229 screens in 20 markets for a total of $11.8 million. The film opened in third place in Russia with $1.1 million on 273 screens while it fell to fourth place in the United Kingdom with $1.5 million on 381 screens over the weekend for a total of $6.1 million.
Saw VI was released in Spain on , and grossed $1.2 million on its opening weekend in 211 theaters.
Saw VI came to gross $27.6 million in the United States and Canada, and $40.5 million in other markets, for a worldwide total of $68.2 million; making it the second lowest-grossing film of the series. Audiences polled by
CinemaScore reported that the average grade moviegoers gave the film was a "B" on an A+ to F scale. 's character was killed in
Saw III, his Jigsaw persona sustains a crucial part in every sequel.
Owen Gleiberman, writing for
Entertainment Weekly, said that "
Saw VI is the thinnest, draggiest, and most tediously preachy of the
Saw films. It's the first one that's more or less consumed by backstory—which is to say, it's one of those hollow franchise placeholders in which far too many fragments from the previous sequels keep popping up in flashbacks." He said, "If your goal is to do a quick study for a round of
Saw Trivial Pursuit, then this may be the movie for you. If you're looking to be jolted into fear or queasy laughter, skip this sequel and hope that the producers get their sick act together next time." Rob Nelson of
Variety wrote, "Squeezing another pint of blood from its
torture porn corpus, Lionsgate slays again with
Saw VI, a film so frighteningly familiar it could well be called 'Saw It Already'. At least the requisite moralism is more playful than pious in this edition", but added, "Presumably owing to director Kevin Greutert's work as editor of all five previous
Saw pics, the film's juggling of chronology is the franchise's best...."
IGN's Christopher Monfette rated
Saw VI three out of five and wrote, "while
Saw VI certainly offers a redemption for the series and the promise of a coming power struggle for Jigsaw's legacy,
Saw VII will no doubt mark the time to either shake things up or watch this franchise get the ax".
Frank Scheck of
The Hollywood Reporter' said, "If this is torture porn, it's as if it was designed to be enjoyed by
Michael Moore." He closed his review saying, "As usual, what gives the film whatever interest it has -- beyond satisfying the rapacious appetites of gore aficionados -- is the moral element attached to the various
Rube Goldberg-style set pieces. Here, it's exemplified by a well-staged sequence in which a man must choose who lives or dies during a particularly lethal variation of musical chairs." Roger Moore writing for
Orlando Sentinel gave the film two out of five stars. He said the script "has a more lyrical bent, and a more satiric bite, than any of the other
Saw sequels" and called the acting "perfunctory on most fronts". The
Los Angeles Times Robert Abele gave the film a negative review, writing "But, really, do reformers and victims of callous health insurers really want a guy with a penchant for elaborately constructed death panels of his own to be their advocate? Elsewhere, the usual critiques apply: terrible acting, zero suspense, laughable logic and the promise of another one next year. How can we get this policy canceled?" Chris Hewitt of the
St. Paul Pioneer Press gave the film a negative review. He was displeased that the film offered nothing new saying, "The first three
Saw movies had some intriguing ideas and an unusual way of presenting them, but the three most recent films have barely bothered to come up with anything fresh."
Kim Newman of
Empire gave the film three out of five, stating "
Saw VI gets back to
Saw basics in gripping, gruesome manner."
Wesley Morris of
The Boston Globe gave the film a two and half out of four stars saying, "Who knew that the franchise's creators would eventually find a plot twist that made sense? Who knew they'd realize that Tobin Bell's righteous killer had current-events value? Given our cable-news climate, it's not beyond imagining that John Kramer could have his own populist TV show: 'Jigsaw's Death Panel'?". Brad Miska of
Bloody Disgusting gave the film seven out of ten and wrote "
Saw VI is faithful to the franchise and the twist/finale are 100% satisfying.
Saw fans will walk out of the theater with their fists in the air with the feeling that they've reclaimed their beloved franchise." Marc Savlov of
The Austin Chronicle gave the film one and half out of five stars, saying "Enshrouding the whole gooey mess in the already blood-spattered surgical garb of the ongoing health care debate is a crafty move on the screenwriters' part, but once you get past that pseudo-ironic touch, this
Saw is no more or less disturbing than any other in the series". ==Notes==