Unlike other mass calamity incidents that occurred internationally shortly before the 29 October 2022 Halloween disaster, such as the 2021
Astroworld Festival crowd crush in
Houston, or the 2022
Kanjuruhan Stadium disaster in
Malang, no official sponsors or organizers were associated with the Halloween celebrations in Itaewon. Opinion polls conducted in November 2022 found that 7 out of 10 South Koreans believed that the government is responsible for the crush. However, there has been ongoing debate on how to assign blame. On 5 November, thousands gathered in central Seoul at a
candlelight vigil organized by Candlelight Action, a civic group linked to South Korea's main opposition party. Many held signs that read: "Step down, Yoon Suk-yeol."
Criticisms of the investigation The handling of the investigation has also been the subject of criticism. Some have accused the investigations of focusing too much on front line working officials and not any of the police chiefs, or the Ministry of Interior and Safety. The press conference was organized by the non-profit advocacy group Lawyers for a Democratic Society, or "
Minbyun". On 21 December 2022, the bereaved families of many of the victims of the Halloween disaster called for more and swifter justice and lamented the continuation of widespread "unaccountability". The police investigation was criticized by the bereaved for failing to hold top officials accountable.
Criticisms of the government In early November, the South Korean state announced that it would use the term "accident" instead of "disaster" to avoid damaging Itaewon's reputation as a popular tourist destination. The decision caused public anger. Some alleged that the term "accident" failed to appropriately attribute responsibility to the government. Regarding the young man who committed suicide weeks after the crush, the Prime Minister
Han Duck-soo said of the victim, "Wouldn't it be better if he had been firmer and had a stronger desire to receive therapy?", causing controversy. The opposition parties criticized it as "a shocking absurd statement that blames the victim". At the time of the disaster, officers at the Yongsan District Office allegedly worked on removing leaflets criticizing President Seok-Yeol Yoon near the Samgak area of Seoul Subway Line 4, which some alleged may have delayed emergency response. Both
South Korean Minister of the Interior Lee Sang-min and the Interior Ministry's subordinate police have repeatedly acknowledged their roles in causing the incident. In a poll, more than half of South Koreans demanded the resignation of minister Lee. 57% of respondents said the government's investigation was insufficient. In February 2023, Lee was suspended from his position by the
National Assembly for his handling of the disaster. He was succeeded by
Han Chang-seob. In addition, a document created by the police for the purpose of exploring the trends of bereaved families and civic groups related to the disaster after the disaster became controversial. The
Kyunghyang Shinmun said in a report, "In this document, there are expressions that are reminiscent of the intelligence police's surveillance of civilians in the past." In this document, in relation to the Sewol ferry disaster in the past, a law was created to counter attempts to interpret the disaster as government responsibility. A city council member belonging to the ruling party, the
People's Power Party, became controversial because he spoke harshly to the bereaved family. In the messages posted on social media, city council member Kim Mi-na made comments such as 'a foolish mother', 'a trick to get a share by selling her children', and 'there is a sound of selling her children and doing business', which caused controversy. Public opinion grew that she should be removed from the council, but she was not expelled thanks to the protection of the PPP members who had a majority on the city council. Afterwards, the government did not allow the bereaved families to hold a memorial service on the 100th day of the disaster. After calls for an investigation by the families of victims,
right wing provocateurs who perceived their advocacy as an attack on the government, verbally abused the mourners. The report released on the first anniversary of the disaster shows that the manpower needed to control the crowd was not properly used to prevent a rally in front of the Yongsan presidential office targeting President Yoon Seok-yeol. The report cited the remarks of the intelligence officer in charge of Itaewon and stated, "When I said I would go to Itaewon that day, the intelligence officer said, 'What is there to do at the festival?' and ordered support at the rally site." Only opposition party leaders, including the Democratic Party of Korea, attended the memorial service commemorating the first anniversary of the disaster. Only some members of the leadership of the ruling People Power Party attended. Yongsan District Mayor Park Hee-young, a member of the PPP who did not attend the memorial service, drew criticism for attending an event to see off a group that opposed the memorial rally and attacked the bereaved family as 'outlaws' at the time. Controversy has reignited over Yoon's handling of the crisis after former
Speaker of the National Assembly Kim Jin-pyo published his memoirs on the matter on 27 June 2024, in which Kim claimed that he had spoken to Yoon over his handling of the disaster on 5 December 2022 and had tried to persuade Yoon to fire
Lee Sang-min, who was
Minister of the Interior and Safety at the time. According to Kim, Yoon replied that Kim was right, but that he had "strong suspicions" about the matter, couldn't "rule out the possibility" that the accident was "induced and manipulated by certain forces," and that it would be unfair to Lee to fire him in that case.
Park Hong-keun, then Floor Leader of the
Democratic Party, doubled down on Kim's claim, saying he had met Kim at the time and had written down what he had heard from Kim in a memo. According to Park, Yoon allegedly said that he could not understand that so many had flocked to Itaewon, which only had a few South East Asian restaurants, and that it was suspicious that left-wing media such as
MBC,
KBS, and
JTBC had aired broadcasts from 2, 3 days before the incident inducing people to go there. Further, according to Park, Yoon said that he suspected a possibility that it was not an accident but a crime perpetrated by certain forces or actors. In response to Kim's claims, the
Presidential Office has stated in an official statement on 27 June 2024 that "it is deplorable that a former National Assembly speaker would distort a private conversation with the president and reveal it to the public," adding that Yoon had ordered a complete investigation into every suspicion raised by the media on every occasion, that he had ordered the 911 emergency calls to be opened to the public and had recently accepted an independent counsel inquiry into the matter. ==Memorials==