It is frequently assumed in
astrobiology that if life exists elsewhere in the
Universe, it will also be carbon-based. Critics, like
Carl Sagan in 1973, refer to this assumption as
carbon chauvinism. A few other elements have been proposed as candidates for supporting biological systems and processes as fundamentally as carbon does, for example, processes such as
metabolism. The most frequently suggested alternative is
silicon. Silicon, atomic number of 14, more than twice the size of carbon, shares a group in the
periodic table with carbon, can also form four
valence bonds, and also bonds to itself readily, though generally in the form of
crystal lattices rather than long chains. Despite these similarities, silicon is considerably more
electropositive than carbon, and silicon compounds do not readily
recombine into different permutations in a manner that would plausibly support lifelike processes. Silicon is abundant on Earth, but as it is more electropositive and in a water based environment it forms Si–O bonds rather than Si–Si bonds.
Boron does not react with acids and does not form chains naturally. Thus boron is not a candidate for life.
Arsenic is
toxic to life, and its possible candidacy has been rejected. In the past (1960s–1970s) other candidates for life were plausible, but with time and more research, only carbon has the complexity and stability to make large molecules and polymers essential for life. ==Fiction==