The original description of
Sinotyrannus proposed that it could have been the earliest
tyrannosaurid due to its large size, However, Brusatte et al. (2016) instead placed
Juratyrant and
Stokesosaurus outside of the Proceratosauridae, and proposed that
Sinotyrannus represents the
sister taxon of
Yutyrannus within Proceratosauridae. The results of their phylogenetic analyses are shown in the cladogram below: }} Naish & Cau in 2022 found
Sinotyrannus within Proceratosauridae but placed
Yutyrannus among the more advanced Tyrannosauroidea. In 2024,
Andrea Cau published a comprehensive theropod
phylogenetic framework that could be used to identify immature specimens of other taxa. The following year, Cau and Paterna used an updated version of this dataset to deduce that
Sinotyrannus—known from a specimen of an adult individual—was a mature form of the "
compsognathid"
Huaxiagnathus, which is known only from two immature specimens. Both species share a dorsally convex with a short preacetabular process without an anteroventral hook. Other differences observed between the two species are likely the result of differences in body size and ontogenetic stage, consistent with the more established growth series of other tyrannosauroids like
Tyrannosaurus. Since
Huaxiagnathus was named before
Sinotyrannus, this genus name holds priority, making
Sinotyrannus a
junior synonym of the former. In their phylogenetic tree, the combined
Sinotyrannus+
Huaxiagnathus operational taxonomic unit (OTU) was recovered as the sister taxon to
Eotyrannus in a clade with other traditional proceratosaurids. ==Paleoenvironment==