The London opening of
Sirocco met with violently unfavourable audience reaction and a generally adverse critical reception. Coward's biographers
Mander and Mitchenson comment that the scenes in the theatre at the final curtain "have passed into stage history". Coward was later asked whether he had ever despaired when faced with a failure like
Sirocco. He replied, "Well, if I'm going to have a flop, I like it to be a rouser. I didn't despair at all. What made it much more interesting was that my mother, who is slightly deaf, thought the booing was cheering. Incredibly Basil Dean, the producer of the play, made the same mistake. He was ringing the curtain up and down with a
beaming smile. I said, 'Wipe that smile off your face, dear – this is it.'" Coward later said, "My first instinct was to leave England immediately, but this seemed too craven a move, and also too gratifying to my enemies, whose numbers had by then swollen in our minds to practically the entire population of the British Isles." Despite the hostile audience response, the newspaper reviews were not universally uncomplimentary.
The Times commented that Coward had brought the debacle on himself, but in
The Observer St John Ervine thought
Sirocco contained "more
theme, more
idea" than in any of Coward's plays since
The Vortex.
Ivor Brown in
The Manchester Guardian thought the first two acts weak but the third good: "[Coward] strips his pretentious lover relentlessly; there is no mercy needed or given" ==References and sources==