Interwar modernism Yugoslav architecture emerged in the first decades of the 20th century before the
establishment of the state; during this period a number of South Slavic creatives, enthused by the possibility of statehood, organized a series of art exhibitions in
Serbia in the name of a shared Slavic identity. Following governmental centralization after the 1918 creation of the
Kingdom of Yugoslavia, this initial bottom-up enthusiasm began to fade. Yugoslav architecture became more and more dictated by an increasingly concentrated national authority which sought to establish a unified state identity. Beginning in the 1920s, Yugoslav architects began to advocate for
architectural modernism, viewing the style as the logical extension of progressive national narratives. The Group of Architects of the Modern Movement, an organization founded in 1928 by architects
Branislav Đ Kojić,
Milan Zloković,
Jan Dubovy, and Dusan Babic, pushed for the widespread adoption of modern architecture as the "national" style of Yugoslavia to transcend regional differences. Despite these shifts, differing relationships to the West made the adoption of modernism inconsistent in Yugoslavia during WWII; while the westernmost republics of
Croatia and
Slovenia were familiar with Western influence and eager to adopt modernism,
long-Ottoman Bosnia remained more resistant to do so. Of all Yugoslavian cities,
Belgrade has the highest concentration of modernist structures. File:Skopje, razglednica so Gradska bolnica, 1930.jpg|The Skopje City Hospital was designed in 1930 by
Drago Ebler File:Antigua_estación_de_ferrocarril,_Skopie,_Macedonia,_2014-04-17,_DD_15.JPG|
Old Skopje Train Station Socialist realism and creation of national architecture (1945–48) Immediately following
World War II in Yugoslavia, the Macedonian national architecture was established in the
Socialist Republic of Macedonia after its creation as part of
SFR Yugoslavia. Macedonian architects then mostly relied on Yugoslav and Bulgarian scholarly works. They were also educated in Yugoslav academic institutions. Yugoslavia's brief association with the
Eastern Bloc ushered in a short period of
socialist realism. Centralization within the communist model led to the abolishment of private architectural practices and the state control of the profession. During this period, the governing
Communist Party condemned modernism as "bourgeois formalism," a move that caused friction among the nation's pre-war modernist architectural elite.
Socialist modernism Socialist realist architecture in Yugoslavia came to an abrupt end with
Josip Broz Tito's 1948
split with Stalin. In the following years the nation turned increasingly to the West, returning to the modernism that had characterized pre-war Yugoslav architecture. File:St. Clement Church Skopje 3.jpg|Orthodox Cathedral Saint Clement of Ohrid
Slavko Brezoski, Skopje, 1972 File:Stokovna kukja Skopje, 1962.jpg|Stokovna Kukja by Slavko Brezoski, Skopje, 1962 File:Rabotnički Dom.jpg|Rabotnički Dom by Slavko Brezoski, Skopje, 1963 File:Hotel Neda in Galičnik by Slavko Brezoski.jpg|Hotel Neda Slavko Brezoski, Galičnik, 1983 File:Hotel Slavija Popova Shapka.jpg|Hotel Slavija by Slavko Brezoski, 1960s File:High Rise Slavko Brezoski.jpg|Apartment block 'Papagal' by Slavko Brezoski, 1957
Memorials During this period, the Yugoslav break from Soviet socialist realism combined with efforts to commemorate World War II, which together led to the creation of an immense quantity of abstract sculptural
war memorials. , Kruševo
Brutalism in Skopje In the late 1950s and early 1960s
Brutalism began to garner a following within Yugoslavia, particularly among younger architects, a trend possibly influenced by the 1959 disbandment of the
Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne. Brutalism's growing influence in the nation was most prominently exemplified in reconstruction efforts of Skopje following a destructive
1963 earthquake. Japanese architect
Kenzo Tange played a key role in pushing for brutalism in the city, going so far as to propose a full redesign of Skopje in the style. The earthquake destroyed 80% of the city, the reconstruction effort received international attention and the world contributed a century of modern architectural knowledge to the effort of rebuilding. The winning teams included
Kenzo Tange (Japan),
Johannes van den Broek and
Jaap Bakema (Holland),
Luigi Piccinato (Italy),
Maurice Rotival (USA),
Aleksandar Dordevik (Yugoslavia),
Eduard Ravnikar (Yugoslavia),
Radovan Mischevik and
Fedor Wenzler (Yugoslavia), and
Slavko Brezoski (Yugoslavia). The result of the earthquake was the development of an urban master plan for the city, internationally inspired with a focus on social and urban modernisation, a catalyst for architectural development of Skopje and Macedonia. Reconstruction of Skopje was executed as a major international urban master plan and building effort, see
Skopje Master Plan. File:E73a14 176e383174c04c1780e630dc4ef60736 mv2.jpg|Skopje Masterplan Model
Kenzo Tange File:Students' dormitory Goce Delčev Skopje 8.jpg|Student dormitory (1971) by
Georgi Konstantinovski in Skopje File:Skopje University Aerial 70s.webp|University of Skopje Campus by
Marko Mušič, 1974 File:Muzej na sovremenata umetnost - Skopje (9).jpg|
Contemporary Art Museum of Macedonia (1970) in Skopje File:Pošta vo Skopje, Macedonia.jpg|Skopje Central Post Office (1974) by
Janko Konstantinov in Skopje File:Hydrometeorological Institute Skopje 2.jpg|Hydrometeorological Institute (1979) by
Krsto Todorovski in Skopje
Decentralization (1972) by
Slavko Brezoski in Skopje blurs the lines between Macedonian religious architecture and postmodernism. With 1950s decentralization and liberalization policies in
SFR Yugoslavia, architecture became increasingly fractured along ethnic lines. Architects increasingly focused on building with reference to the architectural heritage of their individual socialist republics in the form of
critical regionalism. Growing distinction of individual ethnic architectural identities within Yugoslavia was exacerbated with the 1972 decentralization of the formerly centralized historical preservation authority, providing individual regions further opportunity to critically analyze their own cultural narratives. == Contemporary architecture ==