Upon release,
Some Girls received extremely positive reviews from music critics, with many agreeing it was the Stones' best work since
Exile on Main St. Robert Hilburn ranked
Some Girls one of the band's best works in the
Los Angeles Times, calling it a "splendid return to form". Reviewing for
The Village Voice in 1978,
Robert Christgau said,The Stones' best album since
Exile on Main St. is also their easiest since
Let It Bleed or before. They haven't gone for a knockdown uptempo classic, a '
Brown Sugar' or '
Jumpin' Jack Flash'—just straight rock and roll unencumbered by horn sections or
Billy Preston. Even Jagger takes a relatively direct approach, and if he retains any credibility for you after six years of dicking around, there should be no agonizing over whether you like this record, no waiting for tunes to kick in. Lyrically, there are some bad moments—especially on the title cut, which is too fucking indirect to suit me—but in general the abrasiveness seems personal, earned, unposed, and the vulnerability more genuine than ever. Also, the band is a real good one. Real good.In his review of the album for
Rolling Stone in June 1978,
Paul Nelson wrote that while
Some Girls may have been the band's finest LP since its "certified masterpiece",
Exile on Main St., "what I won't buy is that the two albums deserve to be mentioned in the same breath. [...]
Some Girls is like a marriage of convenience: when it works — which is often — it can be meaningful, memorable and quite moving, but it rarely sends the arrow straight through the heart." Fellow critic
Dave Marsh was also negative towards the record, citing inconsistent song quality and band performances. Three months later, in September,
Rolling Stone editor
Jann Wenner published his own review, rebutting that of Nelson. He heaped praise on the "Miss You" single, writing that the song "exemplifies the polish, power, and passion of the Stones", equalled '
Tumbling Dice' and 'Brown Sugar', and "may even set new standards for the band." At the end of the year,
Rolling Stone named both the band and
Some Girls their top artist and album of the year, respectively. Writing for
Circus magazine,
Nick Tosches gave praise to the record, calling it their best in five years: "After five years, the rhythm is back, and satisfaction and shelter are once again just out of reach." He further wrote that
Some Girls more than makes up for the group's prior works. After
Black and Blue, Richard Riegel of
Creem called
Some Girls a return to "refreshingly kinetic rock 'n' roll". He further gave praise to Jagger's vocal performances and Wood's contributions on guitar. In
Sounds, Peter Silverton spoke positively of the record, highlighting "Miss You" as the standout. He concluded: "Because they recorded so quickly (by their standards) they've achieved an immediacy on this which has been sorely lacking on their last few studio albums. It's far from great but it's certainly better than we had any right to expect after all these years."
Kris Needs, in a review for
ZigZag magazine, complimented the album's consistency when compared to its three predecessors. Needs further praised the lyrics as improvements over their prior works.
NMEs
Charles Shaar Murray gave the album a more mixed assessment. Although he agreed it was their finest work since
Exile on Main St., he felt it was more a Jagger solo record than a proper Rolling Stones record, praising his singing and Watts's drumming. Nevertheless, he considered the production a step up from
Black and Blue and gave high praise to "Shattered". At the end of the year,
Rolling Stone ranked
Some Girls the best album of 1978. Other publications, including
Sounds and
NME, placed the album at numbers 4 and 18 in their respective lists of the year's best albums.
Reappraisal Some Girls has continued to receive critical acclaim, with many reviewers commending the band's ability to blend punk and disco influences with their older signature style. Writing for
AllMusic,
Stephen Thomas Erlewine praised the album, calling it "a tough, focused, and exciting record, full of more hooks and energy than any Stones record since
Exile on Main St." Commending the group's performance compared to their previous works, Erlewine felt the rock tracks sound "harder and nastier than they have in years". He concluded his review stating: "
Some Girls may not have the back-street aggression of their '60s records, or the majestic, drugged-out murk of their early-'70s work, but its brand of glitzy, decadent hard rock still makes it a definitive Stones album." In
The A.V. Club, Steven Hyden commented that the record was not a case of
selling out, but rather showcased that the band "could pull off the old magic using some flashy new tricks". Hyden further praised Richards' guitar performance, particularly on "Beast of Burden" and "Before They Make Me Run", writing that he is "healthier and more prominent on
Some Girls than on any Stones record since
Exile On Main St."
Rankings Some Girls has frequently appeared on several "best-of" lists by multiple publications. In 2000, it was voted number 300 in writer
Colin Larkin's book
All Time Top 1000 Albums. In 2003
Some Girls was ranked number 269 on
Rolling Stone magazine's list of the
500 Greatest Albums of All Time, 270 in a 2012 revised list, and 468 in the 2020 revised list. In 2015,
Ultimate Classic Rock included the album in their list of the top 100 rock albums of the '70s, while a year later,
Classic Rock magazine placed the album at number seven on its list of the 100 greatest albums of the '70s. ==Reissues==