The
London and Southampton Railway had been promoted with the intention of enabling a connection between the
docks at Southampton and the capital. Sensing the opportunity to serve a wider area of the south coast, that company changed its name to the
London and South Western Railway (LSWR) in 1839, and the Southampton main line was opened by the LSWR on 11 May 1840. The LSWR wished to expand its network towards
Exeter, but had early on been frustrated by the success of the
Great Western Railway (GWR) and its ally, the
Bristol and Exeter Railway (B&ER) in extending into the region. Proposals were put forward as early as 1836, but it was not until 1847 that the company connected
Salisbury in to its network, and that was a branch from
Bishopstoke (Eastleigh), giving a circuitous route from London. Before that, in 1844, Charles Castleman, a solicitor prominent in
Wimborne Minster, had independently proposed a westward line from Southampton via Ringwood to
Dorchester, and possibly on via
Bridport to
Exeter from there. Many railway schemes had been improbable in conception and Castleman went to some trouble to ensure a practicable and worthwhile scheme; Captain
William Moorsom, an experienced railway engineer, was appointed by Castleman's committee of "respected local persons" to survey a route. At a public meeting on 19 July 1844 Moorsom's proposed route was accepted, and the Weymouth interest was appeased for the time being by a statement of intent to eventually reach their town, and the possible renaming of the line the Southampton and Dorsetshire Railway; the renaming did not last long. The GWR agreed to discuss the matter, and after some weeks, a lease of the future line was signed by them. Throughout its early existence, the LSWR had been at pains to secure territory in which it might be the dominant, or only, railway company, and the gauge of the track with which a new line was to be built determined its alliance with the broad gauge interests (the GWR, the B&ER and other associated companies) or railways with the standard gauge of . (In this context the latter were usually referred to as "narrow-gauge" railways, and the competitive battles to ensure that new lines were specified to be built to the preferred gauge were referred to as the
Gauge War.) The LSWR were therefore alarmed at this development, as it would bring broad gauge trains into Southampton Docks, the heart of territory the LSWR considered its own, and immediately promoted a rival scheme to reach Wimborne and Dorchester from Salisbury, which it had not yet reached. Opinion in local communities largely favoured the Southampton and Dorchester proposals, seeing the LSWR for the obstructive tactic that it was, and welcoming the competition that GWR alliance would bring to an area dominated by the LSWR. Moreover, Weymouth would get its connection, through the broad gauge
Wilts, Somerset and Weymouth Railway now being promoted via Dorchester; and some favoured a coastal line for its usefulness in defensive troop movements in the event of an attack by France. The major disadvantage was that there would be a break of gauge at Southampton for passengers and goods travelling between Dorset and London.
An act secured Accordingly, the Southampton and Dorchester Railway got its act of Parliament, the '''''' (
8 & 9 Vict. c. xciii), on 21 July 1845, with authorised capital of £500,000. The lease to the LSWR was authorised in the act. A branch from
Hamworthy to the ballast quay at
Poole was also authorised, and the broad gauge
Wilts, Somerset and Weymouth Railway (authorised in the same session of Parliament) could be required to lay narrow gauge rails to give LSWR trains access to
Weymouth. this became the present-day
Southampton station. From there the line was to run westerly, crossing the
River Test at
Eling, and then run south-west to
Brockenhurst. but on 2 May 1847 there was a collapse of the newly constructed
railway tunnel at Southampton. The damage extended about and opened to the surface near the western end of the tunnel; it was caused by disturbance to the ground created around the route of the old
Southampton and Salisbury Canal tunnel through which the new tunnel had cut. This was quickly restored, and on 20 May Captain Coddington conducted the formal inspection of the route, which continued the next day. He was satisfied with the standard of workmanship of the line, but commented adversely on the narrow opening of the overbridges, and the fact that the entire line west of
Redbridge was single: the longest such length in England, he thought. He also criticised the sharp curve at
Northam where the line joined the existing LSWR route; the company agreed to alter the curve to a larger radius. The public opening was planned for 1 June, but on 30 May the interior of the Southampton tunnel suffered further problems, with a large bulge in the walls indicating a section was sinking. With no connection to the mainline to London, the
Blechynden terrace station was the terminus; the LSWR had to transport their locomotives there by road through the streets of Southampton. The Poole branch (to Lower Hamworthy) opened at the same time. The tunnel was eventually opened in August 1847 after remedial works, Captain Coddington having returned and reported: About 50 or 60 years ago a Tunnel was constructed for canal purposes which proved a failure and was abandoned, I enquired what precautions had been taken at the crossing, and was informed that the old Tunnel had been completely taken out, and that in addition a length of twenty feet of the old tunnel on either side of the new one had been built solid with rubble masonry. It appears that Mr Peto the contractor, for the accommodation of those parties whose property lies above the line of the old Tunnel, agreed to strengthen it by building a certain number of cross walls at short intervals. The mode adopted in doing it was to drive a small gallery laterally from the side of the new Tunnel to reach the old one at a point some distance beyond the 20 feet which had been solidly built up. Through this gallery the materials were introduced and 3, 4 or more cross walls about 10 feet apart were built within it. The old tunnel having been on a level and open at its extremities whatever percolation of water entered it either from the sides or above flowed out at both ends. The crossing of the new tunnel in no way affected this drainage, but by the filling up solid of a portion of it, leaving a hollow interval, the accumulation of water in seeking an egress has entered into, saturated the soil on which the new Tunnel stands, and it is now incapable of supporting its weight. ==After opening day==