speaking at the
2008 Republican National Convention speaking at the
2012 Democratic National Convention speaking at the
2016 Republican National Convention Purpose Speeches by spouses have typically served to illustrate a softer side of the nominee, with the spouses often sharing humanizing personal anecdotes. Historian
Carl Sferrazza Anthony observed of speeches by the spouses of presidential nominees, In 2012, Allgor and Anthony each opined that the speeches are perhaps an outgrowth of Americans' and their media's long-standing fascination with the spouses of presidents. The Trump campaign at first denied allegations of
plagiarism. Campaign manager
Paul Manafort argued that the speech contained "not that many similarities" and the words used are not unique words "that belong to the Obamas." Chris Harrick, Vice President of Marketing at the plagiarism prevention service
Turnitin, later reported that Trump used about 6% of Michelle Obama's words and found two types of plagiarism, "clone" and "find and replace".
Grade-level analysis of speeches Smart Politics (a project of
University of Minnesota) conducted
Flesch-Kincaid grade level analysis of speeches by the spouses of presidential nominees between 1992 and 2012. In 2016,
The Boston Globe conducted similar analysis of the speeches of key speakers at both conventions, including the speeches by presidential nominee spouses. ==References==