The genus was erected in 1804 by
Pierre Latreille for the species
Sphecodes gibbus. That species was initially described by
Carl Linnaeus as
Sphex gibba. The fact that the type specimen was initially described as a wasp was not lost on Latreille as the name he chose for the genus,
Sphecodes, means "like a wasp". In the late 18th and early 19th-centuries, the taxonomy of
Apoidea was very unclear, and at various points
Sphecodes species were described as the following genera:
Sphex Linnaeus, 1758;
Nomada Latrielle, 1802;
Halictus Latrielle, 1804;
Apis Linnaeus, 1758;
Melitta Kirby, 1802;
Andrena Fabricius, 1775; and
Tiphia Fabricius, 1775.
Charles Robertson was particularly prolific in describing genera that would be synonomized with
Sphecodes later on, although the differences he noticed are now reflected in the subgenera. The following genera are now considered subgenera:
Drepanium Robertson, 1903;
Proteraner Robertson, 1903; and
Sphecodium Robertson, 1903. Subgeneric classifications are currently debated, and whether they are truly monophyletic groups remains unknown.
Callosphecodes Friese, 1909 may either be a synonym or subgenus, but specimens that match its description are exceedingly rare.
Phylogeny Relatively few phylogenetic studies have been completed for the genus, and none that are exhaustive or analyze
biogeography.
Sphecodes is a member of the family
Halictidae and in the tribe Sphecodini. Sphecodini is sister to Halictini sensu stricto. Genus-level relationships within Sphecodini are still being determined, but recent phylogenies suggest that
Sphecodes is sister to the genus
Eupetersia. It is unknown exactly how many species there are worldwide, and even well-studied regions of the world such as the United States and Europe likely have many species to be described or synonymized.
A note on Halictinae tribes There are two diverging approaches to
tribe-level phylogenies within
Halictinae. The first, used by taxonomists like Danforth, Gibbs, Straka, and Engel among others recognizes only two: Augochlorini and Halictini sensu lato, with the rest of the tribes relegated to subtribes within Halictini s. l. This approach is also used by resources such as iNaturalist and BugGuide. Both are valid and represent the same evolutionary relationships. == Morphology ==