In the
West Bank and
Gaza Strip, sumud represented the Palestinian political strategy as adopted from 1967 onward. As a concept closely related to the land,
agriculture and indigenousness, the ideal image of the Palestinian put forward at this time was that of the peasant (in Arabic,
fellah) who stayed put on his land, refusing to leave. Sumud as a strategy is more passive than the strategy adopted by the
Palestinian fedayeen, though it has provided an important subtext to the narrative of the fighters, "in symbolising continuity and connections with the land, with peasantry and a
rural way of life." In the late 1970s, sumud called for "a collective third way between submission and
exile, between passivity and ...
violence to end the occupation." Static sumud, though underscored by the determination to stay on one's land, was also characterized by an attitude of resignation. The objective of simply remaining in place manifested itself in a reliance on international
aid such as that received from
The Steadfastness Aid Fund of the Jordanian-Palestinian Joint Committee, established by the
Arab Summit Conference in
Baghdad in 1978. Sumud in this sense has meant "staying put despite continuous assault." It is not merely about passive endurance, but "an act of unyielding resistance and defiance."
Palestinian refugees, both those living within and outside of the
occupied territories, often describe their ability to both resist and endure
camp life as sumud. The holding out of Palestinian refugees against the assaults on
Tel al-Zaatar and
Sabra and Shatila in
Lebanon are cited as prime examples of sumud. At the conclusion of the
2021 Israel-Palestine crisis, a woman doctor in Gaza told Israeli journalist
Amira Hass: Now we're back home. I was so happy to return to the garden and our doves. They didn't die, although we hadn't fed them for four days. Like us, they also know the meaning of sumud (steadfastness)... Generation after generation, the
Nakba (catastrophe of 1948) continues. Wherever we go, the Jews persecute us. But they won't eliminate us, that's impossible. They must understand that. We aren't (American) Indians. We'll stay and we will multiply. Nor will we forget... We don't believe in parties, in
Hamas or
Fatah. They can go to hell. But we have faith in God, in our people, in our land, in our homeland.
Non-violent civil disobedience Since 1967, nonviolent protests mounted by Palestinians, such as
general strikes,
boycotts and
demonstrations, have been intimately associated with the concept of sumud.
Raja Shehadeh's conceptualization of sumud, as a non-violent attitude of life that could forge a third way between acceptance of the occupation and opting for violent struggle, gave a voice to those many Palestinians who refused to leave their land and tried to go on with their daily lives. While simply carrying on with daily life under often impossible circumstances can in itself be considered a form of non-violent resistance, more active forms of non-violent civil disobedience have also been inspired and informed by the concept of sumud. In recent years, as a response to a spike of Israeli demolitions around
At-Tuwani and neighbouring villages in the South Hebron Hills, a
Youth for Sumud group has formed, whose aim is to organize protests at the occupation and inspire locals to stay on their land in the face of persistent military and settler harassment.
First Intifada During the First Intifada (1987–1993) the concept of resistance sumud gained full expression in the focus on "freeing Palestinians from dependence on
Israel by refusing to cooperate and by building independent institutions and committees." ==Symbols, icons, literary references==