Much like other cyanobacterial taxa, the taxonomic description of
Synechococcus was originally based on
morphology alone. It was greatly reshaped, repeatedly, with the advance of DNA-based methods, to better reflect what new information indicates is the likely
phylogeny of these bacteria.
GC content data for many strains became available in the 1980s. It was found that so-called
Synechococcus had a GC content ranging from 39 to 71%, an indicator of large genetic diversity. The observation that open-ocean isolates alone nearly span the complete G+C spectrum, however, indicates that
Synechococcus is composed of at least several species. ''
Bergey's Manual of 2001 now divides Synechococcus'' into five clusters (equivalent to genera) based on morphology, physiology, and genetic traits. • Cluster 1 includes relatively large (1–1.5 μm) nonmotile obligate photoautotrophs that exhibit low salt tolerance. Reference strains for this cluster are PCC6301 (formerly
Anacycstis nidulans) and PCC6312, which were isolated from fresh water in
Texas and
California, respectively. • Cluster 3 includes phycoerythrin-lacking marine
Synechococcus species that are
euryhaline, i.e. capable of growth in both marine and freshwater environments. Several strains, including the reference strain PCC7003, are facultative heterotrophs and require
vitamin B12 for growth. • Cluster 4 contains a single isolate, PCC7335. This strain is obligate marine. This strain contains phycoerythrin and was first isolated from the
intertidal zone in
Puerto Peñasco,
Mexico. More recently, Badger
et al. (2002) proposed the division of the cyanobacteria into a α- and a β-subcluster based on the type of
rbcL (large subunit of
ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) found in these organisms. α-cyanobacteria were defined to contain a form IA, while β-cyanobacteria were defined to contain a form IB of this gene. In support for this division Badger
et al. analyze the phylogeny of carboxysomal proteins, which appear to support this division. Also, two particular
bicarbonate transport systems appear to only be found in α-cyanobacteria, which lack carboxysomal carbonic anhydrases. A complete
phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA sequences of
Synechococcus-shaped bacteria was produced in 2014. It revealed at least 12 groups, which morphologically correspond to
Synechococcus, but they have not derived from the common ancestor. Moreover, it has been estimated based on molecular dating that the first
Synechococcus lineage has appeared 3 billion years ago in thermal springs with subsequent radiation to marine and freshwater environments.
Taxonomy Accepted framework Komárek
et al. (2020) uses a combination of phylogenomics and 16S rRNA to divide the
Synechococcus-shaped bacteria into a number of genera, families, and orders. Some of these are newly created (marked with "nov."): •
Thermostichales ord. nov.:
Thermostichaceae fam. nov. (
Thermostichus gen. nov.: type
Tst. vulcanus =
S. vulcanus). •
Synechococcales:
Prochlorococcaceae fam. nov. •
Pseudanabaenales:
Thermosynechococcaceae fam. nov. (
Thermosynechococcus gen. nov.: type
Tsc. vestitus =
S. elongatus var. vestitus = "
Tsc. elongatus") •
Chroococcales:
Aphanothecaceae (
Picosynechococcus gen. nov.: type
Psc. fontinalis) All of these above names are validly published under the provivisions of the
Botanical Code. They are accepted by AlgaeBase and LPSN. Strunecký, Otakar, and Mareš (2023) revised the classification of cyanobacteria, including those traditionally called "
Synechococcus", at the order and family levels. The work combines a phylogenomic tree with a 16S ribosomal tree. This forms the currently-accepted backbone of taxonomy.
GTDB framework Salazar
et al. (2020) split the
Synechococcus-shaped bacteria into 15 genera under 5 different orders using phylogenomics, specifically the methods of
GTDB: •
Synechococcales:
Cyanobiaceae fam. nov. (
Cyanobium,
Inmanicoccus,
Lacustricoccus gen. nov.,
Parasynechococcus,
Pseudosynechococcus,
Regnicoccus,
Synechospongium gen. nov., and
Vulcanococcus) and
Synechococcaceae (
Synechococcus); •
Cyanobacteriales ord. nov.: Limnotrichaceae fam. nov. ("
Limnothrix", which is not correctly represented in GTDB due to a lack of type species genome, but more properly
Picosynechococcus); •
Leptococcales ord. nov.:
Brevicoccaceae (
Brevicoccus) and
Leptococcaceae (
Leptococcus); •
Thermosynechococcales ord. nov.:
Thermosynechococcaceae fam. nov. (
Stenotopis and
Thermosynechococcus); and •
Neosynechococcales ord. nov.:
Neosynechococcaceae fam. nov. (
Neosynechococcus). The GTDB framework is not accepted as legitimate by LPSN and AlgaeBase because the authors have neglected to
validly publish the new taxa by providing explicit, individual descriptions for them. It is possible to map the GTDB names to the accepted framework of 2023 by comparing the phylogenetic trees used in the two works, made easier by the fact that the trees do assemble each other due to both being based on phylogenomics (most synonymy from LPSN): Due to the GTDB and the 2020s accepted frameworks now agreeing on using ==Ecology and distribution==