In
special relativity, a faster-than-light particle would have
spacelike four-momentum, with redefined formulas for momentum and energy. Additionally, since tachyons are confined to the
spacelike portion of the energy–momentum graph, they cannot slow down to subluminal (slower-than-light) speeds. In this framework, neutrinos experience
Lorentz-violating oscillations and can travel faster than light at high energies. This proposal was strongly criticized.
Superluminal information showing that moving faster than light implies time travel in the context of special relativity. A spaceship departs from Earth from A to C slower than light. At B, Earth emits a tachyon, which travels faster than light but forward in time in Earth's reference frame. It reaches the spaceship at C. The spaceship then sends another tachyon back to Earth from C to D. This tachyon also travels forward in time in the spaceship's reference frame. This effectively allows Earth to send a signal from B to D, back in time. If tachyons can transmit information faster than light, then, according to relativity, they violate causality, leading to logical paradoxes of the
"kill your own grandfather" type. This is often illustrated with thought experiments such as the
"tachyon telephone paradox" or "logically pernicious self-inhibitor." The problem can be understood in terms of the
relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that different
inertial reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened "at the same time" or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events. (Technically, these disagreements occur when the
spacetime interval between the events is 'space-like', meaning that neither event lies in the future
light cone of the other.) If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then, as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event. However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backward in time. Because one of the two fundamental
postulates of special relativity says that the laws of physics should work the same way in every inertial frame, if it is possible for signals to move backward in time in any one frame, it must be possible in all frames. This means that if observer A sends a signal to observer B which moves faster than light in A's frame but backwards in time in B's frame, and then B sends a reply which moves faster than light in B's frame but backwards in time in A's frame, it could work out that A receives the reply before sending the original signal, challenging causality in
every frame and opening the door to severe logical paradoxes. This is known as the
tachyonic antitelephone.
Reinterpretation principle The
reinterpretation principle asserts that a tachyon sent
back in time can always be
reinterpreted as a tachyon traveling
forward in time, because observers cannot distinguish between the emission and absorption of tachyons. The attempt to
detect a tachyon
from the future (and violate causality) would actually
create the same tachyon and send it
forward in time (which is causal). However, this principle is not universally accepted as resolving the paradoxes. Instead, what would be required to avoid paradoxes is that, unlike any known particle, tachyons do not interact in any way and can never be detected or observed, because otherwise a tachyon beam could be modulated and used to create an anti-telephone or a "logically pernicious self-inhibitor". == Fundamental models ==