maritime borders in the Gulf of Oman and Persian Gulf are defined by the midpoint of the water The
thalweg principle (also known as the
thalweg doctrine or the
rule of thalweg) is the legal principle that if the
boundary between two political entities is stated to be a waterway without further description (
e.g., a median line, right bank, eastern shore, low-tide line, etc.), the boundary follows the thalweg of that watercourse. A thalweg is the center of the principal navigable channel of the waterway (which is presumed to be the deepest part). The definition has been used in specific descriptions as well. The
Treaty of Versailles, for example, specifies that "In the case of boundaries which are defined by a [navigable] waterway" the boundary is to follow "the median line of the principal channel of navigation." The precise drawing of river boundaries has been important on countless occasions. Notable examples include the
Shatt al-Arab between
Iraq and Iran, the
Danube in central
Europe (
Croatia–Serbia border dispute), the
Kasikili/Sedudu Island dispute between
Namibia and
Botswana (settled by the
International Court of Justice in 1999), and the 2004 dispute settlement under the UN
Law of the Sea concerning the offshore boundary between
Guyana and
Suriname, in which the thalweg of the
Courantyne River played a role in the ruling. In the 20th century dispute between the USSR and China (PRC) over
Zhenbao Island,
China held that the Thalweg principle supported their position.{{cite book ==See also==