The 50% rule was introduced by the
2010 Coalition Government formed from the
Conservative Party and the
Liberal Democrats. In the run up to the
2010 general election, the Liberal Democrat manifesto had stated that "We will ensure that all faith schools develop an inclusive admissions policy." This aim was reflected in the
Coalition Agreement as follows: "We will ensure that all new Academies follow an inclusive admissions policy. We will work with faith groups to enable more faith schools and facilitate inclusive admissions policies in as many of these schools as possible." The 50% rule was first applied following the
Academies Act 2010, via a condition to the Funding Agreements for all new faith academies established under the Free School programme. It was later documented within the 2014 Schools Admissions Code. The
Catholic Education Service lobbied for removal of the 50% Rule, saying that they would not open any Free schools while it was in place. In April 2014, the issue was aired in the House of Commons in a debate led by
Damian Hinds MP. The Coalition Government was replaced by a Conservative Government in the
2015 general election. The Schools Minister with responsibility for Free Schools,
Lord Nash, told campaigners that there were no plans to review the 50% Rule. However, the following year,
Nick Timothy, the newly appointed director of the
New Schools Network, responsible for encouraging and supporting the establishment of Free Schools, spoke out in favour of ending it. When
Theresa May became Prime Minister in 2016, Nick Timothy became her Joint Chief of Staff, and was credited as responsible when later the same year a national consultation by the Department for Education asked for people's views on removing the 50% Rule, to enable new faith academies to select up to 100% of pupils based on their faith. The move was opposed by individuals and groups campaigning for inclusive admissions, including the
Accord Coalition,
Humanists UK and the
National Secular Society as well as other commentators. The results of the consultation were seen as a foregone conclusion by the Catholic Education Service, which wrote in its 2016 annual report: "After a CES coordinated campaign which put pressure on Government officials, parliamentarians and Downing Street special advisers, the Prime Minister announced the removal of the 50% cap on faith-based admission for new Free Schools. This announcement means that Catholic dioceses will be able to open new Catholic schools for the first time in six years." However, in April 2017, before the results of the consultation were published, Theresa May called a
snap general election, with Nick Timothy as a senior advisor for her campaign. Their Conservative manifesto included a pledge to "replace the unfair and ineffective inclusivity rules that prevent the establishment of new Roman Catholic schools." When the election resulted in a
hung parliament, Nick Timothy resigned, and the future of many of the manifesto policies was thrown into doubt. This resulted in speculation as to whether the 50% Rule would be repealed or not, and associated lobbying and campaigning on both sides of the debate. Nevertheless, eight months after the consultation report was expected to be published, the Government said it was "still considering how best to progress the policy proposals ... in light of the responses to the consultation." In January 2018, a Cabinet reshuffle resulted in the incumbent Education Secretary,
Justine Greening, being replaced by
Damian Hinds, whose record of supporting the Catholic Education Service's position on the 50% rule fuelled speculation that he planned to implement the Government's manifesto pledge to remove it. The following month, he confirmed that was his intention. However, in May 2018 it was announced that the 50% cap would remain in place. Instead the Government said it would provide financial support for local authorities that want to work with faith groups to create new
voluntary aided schools. In May 2024, Conservative Education Secretary
Gillian Keegan launched a consultation into abolishing the 50% rule. However, a
General Election was called a few weeks later, and the incoming Labour Government did not include any commitments about the 50% rule in their manifesto. == Application and interpretation ==