Critical response The Hurt Locker received critical acclaim.
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film an approval rating of 96%, based on 287 reviews, with a
weighted average rating of . It was the second highest-rated film of 2009, behind
Pixar's
Up. The critics' consensus reads, "A well-acted, intensely shot, action filled war epic, Kathryn Bigelow's
The Hurt Locker is thus far the best of the recent dramatizations of the Iraq War."
Metacritic, which assigns a
normalized score, gave the film an average score of 95 out of 100, based on 37 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".
Roger Ebert of
The Chicago Sun Times rated the film as the best of 2009, writing, "
The Hurt Locker is a great film, an intelligent film, a film shot clearly so that we know exactly who everybody is and where they are and what they're doing and why." He applauded how the suspense was built, calling the film "spellbinding". Ebert considered Renner "a leading contender for Academy Awards", writing, "His performance is not built on complex speeches but on a visceral projection of who this man is and what he feels. He is not a hero in a conventional sense." He eventually ranked it the second-best film of the decade, behind only
Synecdoche, New York.
Richard Corliss of
Time also praised Renner's performance, calling it a highlight of the film. He wrote, He's ordinary, pudgy-faced, quiet, and at first seems to lack the screen charisma to carry a film. That supposition vanishes in a few minutes, as Renner slowly reveals the strength, confidence and unpredictability of a young Russell Crowe. The merging of actor and character is one of the big things to love about this movie... It's a creepy marvel to watch James in action. He has the cool aplomb, analytical acumen and attention to detail of a great athlete, or a master psychopath, maybe both.
A. O. Scott of
The New York Times called
The Hurt Locker the best American feature film yet made about the war in Iraq: You may emerge from
The Hurt Locker shaken, exhilarated and drained, but you will also be thinking ... The movie is a viscerally exciting, adrenaline-soaked tour de force of suspense and surprise, full of explosions and hectic scenes of combat, but it blows a hole in the condescending assumption that such effects are just empty spectacle or mindless noise.
Kenneth Turan of the
Los Angeles Times wrote that the performances of Renner, Mackie, and Geraghty would raise their profiles considerably, and said their characters reveal their "unlooked-for aspects," such as Renner's character being playful with an Iraqi boy. Turan applauded Boal's "lean and compelling" script and said of Bigelow's direction, "Bigelow and her team bring an awesome ferocity to re-creating the unhinged mania of bomb removal in an alien, culturally unfathomable atmosphere." Guy Westwell of
Sight & Sound wrote that the cinematographer Barry Ackroyd provided "sharp handheld coverage" and that Paul N. J. Ottosson's sound design "uses the barely perceptible ringing of
tinnitus to amp up the tension."
Amy Taubin of
Film Comment described
The Hurt Locker as "a structuralist war movie" and "a totally immersive, off-the-charts high-anxiety experience from beginning to end." Taubin praised Ackroyd's "brilliant" cinematography with multiple viewpoints. She said of the film's editing, "Bob Murawski and Chris Innis's editing is similarly quick and nervous; the rapid changes in POV as they cut from one camera's coverage to another's, makes you feel as if you, like the characters, are under threat from all sides."
Joe Morgenstern of
The Wall Street Journal called it "A first-rate action thriller, a vivid evocation of urban warfare in Iraq, a penetrating study of heroism and a showcase for austere technique, terse writing and a trio of brilliant performances." The
Toronto Star critic Peter Howell said, "Just when you think the battle of Iraq war dramas has been fought and lost, along comes one that demands to be seen... If you can sit through
The Hurt Locker without your heart nearly pounding through your chest, you must be made of granite."
Entertainment Weekly's film critic
Lisa Schwarzbaum gave the film the rare "A" rating, calling it, "an intense, action-driven war pic, a muscular, efficient standout that simultaneously conveys the feeling of combat from within as well as what it looks like on the ground. This ain't no war videogame." Derek Elley of
Variety found
The Hurt Locker to be "gripping" as a thriller but felt that the film was weakened by, "its fuzzy (and hardly original) psychology." Elley wrote that it was unclear to know where the drama lay: "These guys get by on old-fashioned guts and instinct rather than sissy hardware—but it's not a pure men-under-stress drama either." The critic also felt that the script showed "signs of artificially straining for character depth." Anne Thompson, also writing for
Variety, believed
The Hurt Locker to be a contender for Best Picture, particularly based on the unique subject matter pursued by a female director and on being an exception to other films about the Iraq War, which had performed poorly.
Tara McKelvey from
The American Prospect wrote that the film is pro-U.S. Army propaganda, although it suggests it is anti-war with the opening statement: "War is a drug." She continues, You feel empathy for the soldiers when they shoot. And in this way, the full impact of the Iraq war—at least as it was fought in 2004—becomes clear: American soldiers shot at Iraqi civilians even when, for example, they just happened to be holding a cell phone and standing near an IED." She concludes, "For all the graphic violence, bloody explosions and, literally, human butchery that is shown in the film,
The Hurt Locker is one of the most effective recruiting vehicles for the U.S. Army that I have seen.
John Pilger, journalist and documentarian, criticized the film in the
New Statesman, writing that it "offers a vicarious thrill via yet another standard-issue psychopath high on violence in somebody else's country where the deaths of a million people are consigned to cinematic oblivion." In 2010, the
Independent Film & Television Alliance selected the film as one of the 30 Most Significant Independent Films of the last 30 years.
The Hurt Locker was named the tenth "Best Film of the 21st Century So Far" in 2017 by
The New York Times chief film critics
A. O. Scott and
Manohla Dargis. Filmmaker
Michael Mann also cited it as one of his favorite films. In June 2025, it ranked number 68 on
The New York Times list of "The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century" and was one of the films voted for the "Readers' Choice" edition of the list, finishing at number 249. In July 2025, it ranked number 94 on
Rolling Stones list of "The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century." Media Historian Prof
Stuart Ewen criticised in the movie what he described as “a complete celebration of a lone lunatic, but who ultimately is the quintessential American Hero, because lone lunatics are very big in this country” Writing for
The Huffington Post, Iraq veteran Kate Hoit said that
The Hurt Locker is "Hollywood's version of the Iraq war and of the soldiers who fight it, and their version is inaccurate." She described the film as being "better than a lot of the recent war movies that have been released" but expressed concerns that several errors—among them wrong uniforms, lack of radio communication, or misbehavior of the soldiers—would alienate service members from enjoying the film. Author
Brandon Friedman, also a combat veteran of Iraq and
Afghanistan, shared a similar view at
VetVoice: "
The Hurt Locker is a high-tension, well-made, action movie that will certainly keep most viewers on the edges of their seats. But if you know anything about the Army, or about operations or life in Iraq, you'll be so distracted by the nonsensical sequences and plot twists that it will ruin the movie for you. It certainly did for me." Friedman criticized the inaccuracy of the film's representation of combat, saying, "in real life, EOD techs don't conduct dangerous missions as autonomous three-man teams without communications gear ... Another thing you'll rarely hear in combat is an EOD E-7 suggesting to two or three of his guys that they leave the scene of an explosion in an Iraqi city by saying: 'C'mon, let's split up. We can cover more ground that way. At the blog
Army of Dude, infantryman and Iraq veteran Alex Horton noted that "the way the team goes about their missions is completely absurd." He still generally enjoyed it and called it "the best Iraq movie to date." Troy Steward, another combat veteran, wrote on the blog
Bouhammer that while the film accurately depicted the scale of bomb violence and the relations between Iraqis and troops, "just about everything else wasn't realistic." Steward went on to say: "I was amazed that a movie so bad could get any kind of accolades from anyone." A review published March 8, 2010, in the
Air Force Times cited overall negative reviews from bomb experts in Iraq attached to the 4th Brigade, 1st Armored Division, quoting a bomb disposal team leader who called the film's portrayal of a bomb expert "grossly exaggerated and not appropriate," and describing the lead character as "more of a run and gun cowboy type … exactly the kind of person that we're not looking for." Another bomb disposal team member said that the lead character's "swagger would put a whole team at risk. Our team leaders don't have that kind of invincibility complex, and if they do, they aren't allowed to operate. A team leader's first priority is getting his team home in one piece." Former British bomb disposal officer Guy Marot said, "James makes us look like hot-headed, irrational adrenaline junkies with no self-discipline. It’s immensely disrespectful to the many officers who have lost their lives." On the other hand, Henry Engelhardt, an adjutant with the National Explosive Ordnance Disposal Association having twenty years' experience in bomb defusal, complimented the film's atmosphere and depiction of the difficulties of the job, saying, "Of course, no film is realistic in all its details, but the important things were done very well." James Clark, editor-in-chief for
Task and Purpose, writes that despite the controversies about the movie's realism and exaggerated depiction of the soldiers' conduct, the grocery store scene at the end of the movie accurately captures a universal struggle veterans face when returning to civilian life. He describes the struggle as one where veterans become acclimated to making life-or-death decisions and having every minute planned out for them that making mundane decisions can feel overwhelming and uncomfortable, to the point of feeling lost and adrift.
Top ten lists The Hurt Locker was listed on many critics' top ten lists. • 1st –
David Ansen,
Newsweek • 1st –
J. Hoberman,
The Village Voice • 1st –
Kenneth Turan,
Los Angeles Times • 1st – Claudia Puig,
USA Today • 1st –
Lisa Schwarzbaum,
Entertainment Weekly • 1st – Peter Hartlaub,
San Francisco Chronicle • 1st –
Ella Taylor,
L.A. Weekly • 1st –
Roger Ebert,
Chicago Sun-Times • 1st – Mike Scott,
The Times-Picayune • 1st – Elizabeth Weitzman,
New York Daily News • 1st –
Joe Morgenstern,
The Wall Street Journal • 1st – Andrea Gronvall,
Chicago Reader • 1st – David Germain,
Associated Press • 1st –
David Denby,
The New Yorker • 1st –
Bob Mondello,
NPR • 2nd –
A.O. Scott,
The New York Times • 2nd –
Mick LaSalle,
San Francisco Chronicle • 2nd – Tasha Robinson,
The A.V. Club • 2nd –
Michael Sragow,
Baltimore Sun • 2nd – Rene Rodriguez,
Miami Herald • 2nd – Joe Neumaier,
New York Daily News • 2nd – J. R. Jones,
Chicago Reader • 2nd – Michael Rechtshaffen, Ray Bennett, &
Frank Scheck,
The Hollywood Reporter • 3rd – Betsy Sharkey,
Los Angeles Times • 3rd –
Christy Lemire,
Associated Press • 3rd – Stephen Farber,
The Hollywood Reporter • 3rd – Scott Foundas,
L.A. Weekly • 4th –
Richard Corliss,
Time • 4th –
Ty Burr,
Boston Globe • 4th –
Carrie Rickey,
Philadelphia Inquirer • 4th – Liam Lacey,
The Globe and Mail • 4th – Kirk Honeycutt,
The Hollywood Reporter • 5th –
Nathan Rabin,
The A.V. Club • 5th –
James Berardinelli,
Reelviews • 5th –
Michael Phillips,
Chicago Tribune • 5th – Joshua Rothkopf,
Time Out New York • 5th – Marjorie Baumgarten,
Austin Chronicle • 5th –
Joe Williams,
St. Louis Post-Dispatch • 6th –
Stephen Holden,
The New York Times • 6th –
Steven Rea,
Philadelphia Inquirer • 7th –
Ty Burr,
Boston Globe • 7th – Marc Savlov,
Austin Chronicle • 9th – Kimberly Jones,
Austin Chronicle • 9th –
Owen Gleiberman,
Entertainment Weekly • 10th – Keith Phipps & Scott Tobias,
The A.V. Club • 10th –
David Edelstein,
New York Magazine • Top 10 (listed alphabetically) –
Manohla Dargis,
The New York Times • Top 10 (listed alphabetically) –
Bob Mondello,
NPR • Top 10 (listed alphabetically) –
David Denby,
The New Yorker • Top 10 (listed alphabetically) –
Dana Stevens,
Slate ==Accolades==